Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various intracanal medicament in young permanent teeth: An in vivo study.

Anusha Dixit, Rishabh Kapoor, Divya Doneria, Shivani Mathur, Saakshi Goel, Rishba Singh
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various intracanal medicament in young permanent teeth: An in vivo study.","authors":"Anusha Dixit, Rishabh Kapoor, Divya Doneria, Shivani Mathur, Saakshi Goel, Rishba Singh","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_214_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacteria and their byproducts are key contributors to the onset and perpetuation of pulpoperiapical pathosis. Intracanal medication is vital in achieving successful endodontic outcomes as it targets and eradicates remaining microorganisms following biomechanical preparation.</p><p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide (CH) paste, triple antibiotic paste (TAP), and probiotics (PBs) as intracanal medicament in 12-17-year-old children undergoing root canal treatment for the management of infected pulpal tissues in young permanent teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients aged 12-17 years indicated for endodontic therapy in maxillary incisors and with no systemic complications were selected. They were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., Group I - CH group, Group II - TAP, and Group III - PB allocating 10 teeth in each group. After access opening, the first sample (S1) was collected by inserting a paper point into the root canal, the second sample (S2) was collected immediately after biomechanical preparation, and the third sample (S3) was collected after 7 days, i.e., postintracanal medication. Samples were sent for microbiological analysis to assess the microbial count, and statistical analysis was done for the obtained data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three intracanal medicaments were successful in reducing the microbial counts of Enterococcus faecalis in the infected root canals. However, according to the results of the study, the PB group demonstrated greater effectiveness against E. faecalis compared to the CH group and displayed similar antimicrobial efficacy as the TAP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PB exhibited antimicrobial efficacy comparable to TAP but greater than Ca (OH) 2 paste. Hence, PB can be utilized as an intracanal medicament in young permanent teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":101311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"42 3","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_214_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bacteria and their byproducts are key contributors to the onset and perpetuation of pulpoperiapical pathosis. Intracanal medication is vital in achieving successful endodontic outcomes as it targets and eradicates remaining microorganisms following biomechanical preparation.

Aim and objective: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide (CH) paste, triple antibiotic paste (TAP), and probiotics (PBs) as intracanal medicament in 12-17-year-old children undergoing root canal treatment for the management of infected pulpal tissues in young permanent teeth.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients aged 12-17 years indicated for endodontic therapy in maxillary incisors and with no systemic complications were selected. They were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., Group I - CH group, Group II - TAP, and Group III - PB allocating 10 teeth in each group. After access opening, the first sample (S1) was collected by inserting a paper point into the root canal, the second sample (S2) was collected immediately after biomechanical preparation, and the third sample (S3) was collected after 7 days, i.e., postintracanal medication. Samples were sent for microbiological analysis to assess the microbial count, and statistical analysis was done for the obtained data.

Results: The three intracanal medicaments were successful in reducing the microbial counts of Enterococcus faecalis in the infected root canals. However, according to the results of the study, the PB group demonstrated greater effectiveness against E. faecalis compared to the CH group and displayed similar antimicrobial efficacy as the TAP group.

Conclusion: PB exhibited antimicrobial efficacy comparable to TAP but greater than Ca (OH) 2 paste. Hence, PB can be utilized as an intracanal medicament in young permanent teeth.

各种根管内药物对年轻恒牙抗菌效果的比较评估:体内研究
导言:细菌及其副产品是导致牙髓根尖病变发生和延续的主要因素。根管内用药对于取得成功的根管治疗效果至关重要,因为它可以在生物力学预备后靶向清除残留的微生物:该研究旨在比较和评估氢氧化钙(CH)糊剂、三联抗生素糊剂(TAP)和益生菌(PBs)作为根管治疗药物,对接受根管治疗的 12-17 岁儿童年轻恒牙牙髓组织感染的抗菌效果:共选择了 30 名年龄在 12-17 岁、有上颌切牙牙髓治疗适应症且无全身并发症的患者。他们被随机分为三组,即第一组--CH 组、第二组--TAP 组和第三组--PB 组,每组 10 颗牙齿。打开通路后,将纸点插入根管采集第一份样本(S1),生物力学准备后立即采集第二份样本(S2),7 天后(即根管内用药后)采集第三份样本(S3)。样本被送去进行微生物分析,以评估微生物数量,并对获得的数据进行统计分析:结果:三种根管内药物都能成功减少感染根管内的粪肠球菌微生物数量。然而,根据研究结果,PB 组对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果优于 CH 组,与 TAP 组的抗菌效果相似:结论:PB 的抗菌效果与 TAP 相当,但高于 Ca (OH) 2 糊剂。因此,PB 可用作年轻恒牙的冠内药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信