The influence of antenatal betamethasone timing on neonatal outcome in late preterm infants: a single-center cohort study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Thomas Brückner, Anke Redlich
{"title":"The influence of antenatal betamethasone timing on neonatal outcome in late preterm infants: a single-center cohort study.","authors":"Thomas Brückner, Anke Redlich","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07714-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many pregnancies continue after antenatal corticosteroid exposure. Since long-term effects on late preterm neonatal outcome remain controversial, it remains unknown whether pregnant women who are at risk for preterm birth during the late preterm period and had prior antenatal corticosteroid exposure would benefit from an additional course of antenatal corticosteroids. We evaluated the need for future trials on this topic by comparing short term effects from antenatal betamethasone to long-term effects. We also examined the value of a risk-adapted approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We observed neonatal outcomes in late preterm infants (34/0-36/0 weeks of gestation) who were exposed to antenatal betamethasone either up to 10 days prior birth (n = 8) or earlier in pregnancy (n = 89). We examined a real world population from the University Hospital Magdeburg (Germany) between 01 January 2012 and 31 December 2018, and a simulated high-risk population that was derived from the original data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The indicators for relevant adverse outcomes did not differ in the unselected population. In the simulated high-risk population, recent antenatal corticosteroid administration significantly reduced the incidence of relevant cardiorespiratory morbidities (OR = 0.00, p = 0.008), and reduced the number needed to treat from 3.7 to 1.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The superiority of recent antenatal corticosteroid administration in the late preterm period over earlier exposure strongly depended on the prevalence of respiratory disease. Before considering clinical trials on additional antenatal corticosteroid courses in the late preterm period, antenatal assessment tools to predict respiratory morbidity need to be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07714-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many pregnancies continue after antenatal corticosteroid exposure. Since long-term effects on late preterm neonatal outcome remain controversial, it remains unknown whether pregnant women who are at risk for preterm birth during the late preterm period and had prior antenatal corticosteroid exposure would benefit from an additional course of antenatal corticosteroids. We evaluated the need for future trials on this topic by comparing short term effects from antenatal betamethasone to long-term effects. We also examined the value of a risk-adapted approach.

Methods: We observed neonatal outcomes in late preterm infants (34/0-36/0 weeks of gestation) who were exposed to antenatal betamethasone either up to 10 days prior birth (n = 8) or earlier in pregnancy (n = 89). We examined a real world population from the University Hospital Magdeburg (Germany) between 01 January 2012 and 31 December 2018, and a simulated high-risk population that was derived from the original data.

Results: The indicators for relevant adverse outcomes did not differ in the unselected population. In the simulated high-risk population, recent antenatal corticosteroid administration significantly reduced the incidence of relevant cardiorespiratory morbidities (OR = 0.00, p = 0.008), and reduced the number needed to treat from 3.7 to 1.5.

Conclusion: The superiority of recent antenatal corticosteroid administration in the late preterm period over earlier exposure strongly depended on the prevalence of respiratory disease. Before considering clinical trials on additional antenatal corticosteroid courses in the late preterm period, antenatal assessment tools to predict respiratory morbidity need to be developed.

Abstract Image

产前倍他米松时间对晚期早产儿新生儿预后的影响:一项单中心队列研究。
目的:许多孕妇在产前接触皮质类固醇后继续妊娠。由于对早产晚期新生儿预后的长期影响仍存在争议,因此对于那些在早产晚期有早产风险且之前曾接触过产前皮质类固醇的孕妇来说,是否会从额外的产前皮质类固醇疗程中获益仍是一个未知数。通过比较产前倍他米松的短期效果和长期效果,我们评估了今后就这一主题进行试验的必要性。我们还研究了风险适应方法的价值:我们观察了晚期早产儿(妊娠34/0-36/0周)的新生儿结局,这些早产儿在出生前10天(8例)或妊娠早期(89例)接触过产前倍他米松。我们研究了马格德堡大学医院(德国)2012年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间的真实人群,以及根据原始数据得出的模拟高风险人群:结果:在未选择的人群中,相关不良后果的指标没有差异。在模拟高危人群中,近期产前使用皮质类固醇可显著降低相关心肺疾病的发病率(OR = 0.00,P = 0.008),并将需要治疗的人数从3.7降至1.5:结论:在早产儿晚期近期使用产前皮质类固醇比早期使用更有优势,这在很大程度上取决于呼吸系统疾病的发病率。在考虑对早产晚期进行额外的产前皮质类固醇疗程临床试验之前,需要开发产前评估工具来预测呼吸系统发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信