Controlled irrigation can mitigate the greenhouse effects of rice paddy fields with long-term straw return and stimulate microbial necromass carbon accumulation

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Kuanyu Zhu , Tianyang Zhou , Zhikang Li , Weiyang Zhang , Zhiqin Wang , Junfei Gu , Jianchang Yang
{"title":"Controlled irrigation can mitigate the greenhouse effects of rice paddy fields with long-term straw return and stimulate microbial necromass carbon accumulation","authors":"Kuanyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Tianyang Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhikang Li ,&nbsp;Weiyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiqin Wang ,&nbsp;Junfei Gu ,&nbsp;Jianchang Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context and problem</h3><p>The overall greenhouse effects of rice paddy fields are influenced by the balance between greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and soil organic carbon sequestration (SOCS). Studies on how straw return impacts GHG emissions and SOCS under different water regimes—specifically, conventional irrigation (CI) and alternate wetting and moderate drying (AWMD)—are crucial for developing strategies to mitigate the greenhouse effect in rice paddy fields.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop a strategy for decreasing GHG emissions, improving SOCS, and increasing grain yield of rice paddy fields under long-term straw return.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Different water regimes were introduced after six years of straw return in the rice paddy field, and there were four treatments: straw removal and CI (N-CI), straw removal and AWMD (N-AWMD), straw return and CI (R-CI), and straw return and AWMD (R-AWMD). We studied various traits related to soil organic carbon sequestration capacity and GHG emissions over three years to investigate the effects of combination of AWMD and straw return on the GHG emission from paddy field.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Straw return significantly increased net greenhouse gas emissions (NGHGE) and seasonal soil total organic carbon sequestration rate (TOCSR) due to substantial quantity of straw inputs. On average, straw return increased NGHGE by 2.125 t CO<sub>2</sub> ha<sup>–1</sup> and TOCSR by 393.2 kg C ha<sup>–1</sup>, respectively. AWMD could mitigate the greenhouse effects caused by straw return by decreasing NGHGE by 28.0 %, primarily attributed to the reduction in CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (-27.0 %), which outweighed the effects of increased N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Although AWMD did not increase the overall soil organic carbon (SOC) content, it optimized the composition of SOC by increasing the percentage of microbial-derived C, including fungal necromass C (FNC) and bacterial necromass C (BNC), which are more stable than plant-derived C. The aerobic environment in AWMD combined with straw return enhanced the activities of microbes, which promoted the conversion of plant residue C to FNC and BNC and improved soil carbon sequestration.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combination of straw return with AWMD can reduce GHG emission, and optimize soil carbon sequestration by stimulating microbial necromass carbon accumulation.</p></div><div><h3>Implication</h3><p>This study offers valuable insights into mitigating GHG emissions and enhancing soil organic carbon sequestration in high-yielding rice system through the combined adoption of AWMD and straw return.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Article 109571"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context and problem

The overall greenhouse effects of rice paddy fields are influenced by the balance between greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and soil organic carbon sequestration (SOCS). Studies on how straw return impacts GHG emissions and SOCS under different water regimes—specifically, conventional irrigation (CI) and alternate wetting and moderate drying (AWMD)—are crucial for developing strategies to mitigate the greenhouse effect in rice paddy fields.

Objective

This study aimed to develop a strategy for decreasing GHG emissions, improving SOCS, and increasing grain yield of rice paddy fields under long-term straw return.

Methods

Different water regimes were introduced after six years of straw return in the rice paddy field, and there were four treatments: straw removal and CI (N-CI), straw removal and AWMD (N-AWMD), straw return and CI (R-CI), and straw return and AWMD (R-AWMD). We studied various traits related to soil organic carbon sequestration capacity and GHG emissions over three years to investigate the effects of combination of AWMD and straw return on the GHG emission from paddy field.

Results

Straw return significantly increased net greenhouse gas emissions (NGHGE) and seasonal soil total organic carbon sequestration rate (TOCSR) due to substantial quantity of straw inputs. On average, straw return increased NGHGE by 2.125 t CO2 ha–1 and TOCSR by 393.2 kg C ha–1, respectively. AWMD could mitigate the greenhouse effects caused by straw return by decreasing NGHGE by 28.0 %, primarily attributed to the reduction in CH4 emissions (-27.0 %), which outweighed the effects of increased N2O and CO2 emissions. Although AWMD did not increase the overall soil organic carbon (SOC) content, it optimized the composition of SOC by increasing the percentage of microbial-derived C, including fungal necromass C (FNC) and bacterial necromass C (BNC), which are more stable than plant-derived C. The aerobic environment in AWMD combined with straw return enhanced the activities of microbes, which promoted the conversion of plant residue C to FNC and BNC and improved soil carbon sequestration.

Conclusions

The combination of straw return with AWMD can reduce GHG emission, and optimize soil carbon sequestration by stimulating microbial necromass carbon accumulation.

Implication

This study offers valuable insights into mitigating GHG emissions and enhancing soil organic carbon sequestration in high-yielding rice system through the combined adoption of AWMD and straw return.

控制灌溉可减轻稻田长期秸秆还田的温室效应,促进微生物坏死碳积累
背景与问题水稻田的总体温室效应受温室气体(GHG)排放和土壤有机碳固存(SOCS)之间平衡的影响。研究秸秆还田如何影响不同水制度下的温室气体排放和土壤有机碳固存(SOCS),特别是常规灌溉(CI)和交替湿润与适度干燥(AWMD)制度下的温室气体排放和土壤有机碳固存(SOCS),对于制定减轻稻田温室效应的战略至关重要。方法在稻田进行六年秸秆还田后引入不同的水制度,共分为四种处理:秸秆去除和 CI(N-CI)、秸秆去除和 AWMD(N-AWMD)、秸秆还田和 CI(R-CI)以及秸秆还田和 AWMD(R-AWMD)。我们研究了三年中与土壤有机碳固存能力和温室气体排放相关的各种性状,以探讨 AWMD 与秸秆还田相结合对水稻田温室气体排放的影响。结果由于秸秆的大量投入,秸秆还田显著增加了温室气体净排放量(NGHGE)和季节性土壤总有机碳固存率(TOCSR)。平均而言,秸秆还田分别增加了 2.125 吨二氧化碳(公顷-1)和 393.2 千克碳(公顷-1)。AWMD 可减轻秸秆还田造成的温室效应,使 NGHGE 降低 28.0%,这主要归功于 CH4 排放量的减少(-27.0%),其影响超过了 N2O 和 CO2 排放量的增加。虽然 AWMD 没有增加土壤有机碳 (SOC) 的总体含量,但它通过增加微生物衍生碳的比例优化了 SOC 的组成,包括真菌坏死物质 C (FNC) 和细菌坏死物质 C (BNC),这些物质比植物衍生碳更稳定。AWMD 中的有氧环境与秸秆还田相结合,增强了微生物的活动,促进了植物残留碳向 FNC 和 BNC 的转化,提高了土壤固碳能力。结论 将秸秆还田与 AWMD 结合使用可减少温室气体排放,并通过刺激微生物坏死碳积累优化土壤固碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信