Comparing revision rates and survival of pyrocarbon and non-pyrocarbon heads in total- and hemi- shoulder arthroplasty.

IF 2.9 2区医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.028

Dirk Douven, Gert-Jan Geijsen, Paulien M van Kampen, Stefan Heijnen

{"title":"Comparing revision rates and survival of pyrocarbon and non-pyrocarbon heads in total- and hemi- shoulder arthroplasty.","authors":"Dirk Douven, Gert-Jan Geijsen, Paulien M van Kampen, Stefan Heijnen","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This retrospective, observational study aimed to assess the revision rates and survival curves in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) patients, including a sub analysis to investigate the impact of pyrocarbon humeral head in revision rates.Methods: Data from 92 primary HSA and 508 primary TSA patients performed by seven surgeons at a large private clinic, were analyzed. The study focused on revision rates and identified factors leading to revisions, including rotator cuff insufficiency, dislocation, aseptic loosening, implant material, and glenoid erosion.Results: The overall revision rate for HSA was found to be significantly higher at 7.6% compared to TSA at 1.2% with a maximum follow-up of seven years. Sub-analysis within the HSA group revealed a notably higher revision rate in cases involving a metal head (cobalt-chrome or titanium) at 12.8% compared to those with a pyrocarbon head (2.3%).Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of distinguishing between TSA and HSA when evaluating shoulder arthroplasty outcomes. The significantly higher revision rate in HSA, particularly with metal heads, suggests the need for careful consideration of implant selection to optimize long-term success in shoulder arthroplasty procedures.","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective, observational study aimed to assess the revision rates and survival curves in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) patients, including a sub analysis to investigate the impact of pyrocarbon humeral head in revision rates.

Methods: Data from 92 primary HSA and 508 primary TSA patients performed by seven surgeons at a large private clinic, were analyzed. The study focused on revision rates and identified factors leading to revisions, including rotator cuff insufficiency, dislocation, aseptic loosening, implant material, and glenoid erosion.

Results: The overall revision rate for HSA was found to be significantly higher at 7.6% compared to TSA at 1.2% with a maximum follow-up of seven years. Sub-analysis within the HSA group revealed a notably higher revision rate in cases involving a metal head (cobalt-chrome or titanium) at 12.8% compared to those with a pyrocarbon head (2.3%).

Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of distinguishing between TSA and HSA when evaluating shoulder arthroplasty outcomes. The significantly higher revision rate in HSA, particularly with metal heads, suggests the need for careful consideration of implant selection to optimize long-term success in shoulder arthroplasty procedures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

比较全肩关节置换术和半肩关节置换术中热碳头和非热碳头的翻修率和存活率。

研究目的这项回顾性观察研究旨在评估全肩关节置换术（TSA）和半肩关节置换术（HSA）患者的翻修率和存活率曲线，包括一项子分析，以调查热碳肱骨头对翻修率的影响：分析了一家大型私人诊所的七位外科医生为 92 名初次 HSA 和 508 名初次 TSA 患者实施手术的数据。研究重点是翻修率，并确定了导致翻修的因素，包括肩袖功能不全、脱位、无菌性松动、植入物材料和盂侵蚀：结果发现，在最长七年的随访中，HSA的总体翻修率为7.6%，明显高于TSA的1.2%。HSA组内的子分析显示，金属头（钴铬合金或钛合金）病例的翻修率为12.8%，明显高于热碳头病例（2.3%）：本研究强调了在评估肩关节置换术结果时区分TSA和HSA的重要性。HSA的翻修率明显较高，尤其是使用金属头的患者，这表明需要仔细考虑植入物的选择，以优化肩关节成形术的长期成功率。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

23.30%

发文量

604

审稿时长

11.2 weeks

期刊介绍： The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格