Linking social capital and the political economy of substance treatment delivery: The case of recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Carissa van den Berk-Clark , Emily Duncan , Ian Galbreath , Andrew Marino , Elizabeth A. Baker
{"title":"Linking social capital and the political economy of substance treatment delivery: The case of recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois","authors":"Carissa van den Berk-Clark ,&nbsp;Emily Duncan ,&nbsp;Ian Galbreath ,&nbsp;Andrew Marino ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recovery-oriented systems of care have been a widely supported approach to transforming existing substance treatment programs across different states through developing recovery programs and interagency networks. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers influencing their development and implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Qualitative study of 5 different recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois. Nineteen respondents completed individual interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 124 codes and 2 themes were identified, reflecting constraints and opportunities. Theme 1 focused on how ROSC programs developed bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Theme 2 focused on the ROSC coordinator and lead agency's power and accountability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The roles of lead agencies and ROSC coordinators were highlighted in the development and implementation of ROSCs. ROSC membership structures allow for bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Still, additional technical support is needed to improve accountability, reduce power differentials and turf battles, and ensure greater participation among more diverse stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104561"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recovery-oriented systems of care have been a widely supported approach to transforming existing substance treatment programs across different states through developing recovery programs and interagency networks. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers influencing their development and implementation.

Methods

Qualitative study of 5 different recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois. Nineteen respondents completed individual interviews.

Results

A total of 124 codes and 2 themes were identified, reflecting constraints and opportunities. Theme 1 focused on how ROSC programs developed bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Theme 2 focused on the ROSC coordinator and lead agency's power and accountability.

Conclusions

The roles of lead agencies and ROSC coordinators were highlighted in the development and implementation of ROSCs. ROSC membership structures allow for bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Still, additional technical support is needed to improve accountability, reduce power differentials and turf battles, and ensure greater participation among more diverse stakeholders.

将社会资本与提供药物治疗的政治经济联系起来:伊利诺伊州以康复为导向的护理系统案例。
背景:以康复为导向的护理系统是一种广受支持的方法,它通过发展康复计划和机构间网络来改变各州现有的药物治疗计划。然而,人们对影响其发展和实施的促进因素和障碍知之甚少:方法:对伊利诺伊州 5 个不同的以康复为导向的护理系统进行定性研究。19名受访者完成了个人访谈:结果:共确定了 124 个代码和 2 个主题,反映了制约因素和机遇。主题 1 侧重于康复护理系统计划如何发展纽带、桥梁和联系社会资本。主题 2 侧重于 ROSC 协调员和牵头机构的权力和责任:在制定和实施 ROSC 的过程中,领导机构和 ROSC 协调员的作用得到了强调。ROSC 成员结构允许社会资本的结合、连接和联系。不过,还需要更多的技术支持,以加强问责制,减少权力差异和地盘争夺,并确保更多利益相关者的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信