Assessing the effectiveness of greater occipital nerve block in chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muhamad Saqlain Mustafa, Shafin Bin Amin, Aashish Kumar, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Syeda Mahrukh Fatima Zaidi, Syed Ali Arsal, Burhanudin Sohail Rangwala, Muhammad Faheem Iqbal, Adarsh Raja, Abdul Haseeb, Inshal Jawed, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed, Syed Muhammad Sinaan Ali, Giustino Varrassi
{"title":"Assessing the effectiveness of greater occipital nerve block in chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Muhamad Saqlain Mustafa, Shafin Bin Amin, Aashish Kumar, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Syeda Mahrukh Fatima Zaidi, Syed Ali Arsal, Burhanudin Sohail Rangwala, Muhammad Faheem Iqbal, Adarsh Raja, Abdul Haseeb, Inshal Jawed, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed, Syed Muhammad Sinaan Ali, Giustino Varrassi","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03834-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Chronic migraine poses a global health burden, particularly affecting young women, and has substantial societal implications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Greater Occipital Nerve Block (GONB) in individuals with chronic migraine, focusing on the impact of local anesthetics compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted following the PRISMA principles and Cochrane Collaboration methods. Eligible studies included case-control, cohort, and randomized control trials in adults with chronic migraine, adhering to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition (ICHD3). Primary efficacy outcomes included headache frequency, duration, and intensity along with safety assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Literature searches across multiple databases yielded eight studies for qualitative analysis, with five included in the final quantitative analysis. A remarkable reduction in headache intensity and frequency during the first and second months of treatment with GONB using local anesthetics compared to placebo has been reported. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the intervention and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis emphasized the safety and efficacy of GONB, albeit with a cautious interpretation due to the limited number of studies and relatively small sample size. This study advocates for further research exploring various drugs, frequencies, and treatment plans to enhance the robustness and applicability of GONB for chronic migraine management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03834-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Chronic migraine poses a global health burden, particularly affecting young women, and has substantial societal implications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Greater Occipital Nerve Block (GONB) in individuals with chronic migraine, focusing on the impact of local anesthetics compared with placebo.

Methods: A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted following the PRISMA principles and Cochrane Collaboration methods. Eligible studies included case-control, cohort, and randomized control trials in adults with chronic migraine, adhering to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition (ICHD3). Primary efficacy outcomes included headache frequency, duration, and intensity along with safety assessments.

Results: Literature searches across multiple databases yielded eight studies for qualitative analysis, with five included in the final quantitative analysis. A remarkable reduction in headache intensity and frequency during the first and second months of treatment with GONB using local anesthetics compared to placebo has been reported. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the intervention and placebo groups.

Conclusion: The analysis emphasized the safety and efficacy of GONB, albeit with a cautious interpretation due to the limited number of studies and relatively small sample size. This study advocates for further research exploring various drugs, frequencies, and treatment plans to enhance the robustness and applicability of GONB for chronic migraine management.

评估枕大神经阻滞对慢性偏头痛的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:慢性偏头痛给全球健康造成了负担,尤其影响到年轻女性,并对社会产生了重大影响。本研究旨在评估大枕神经阻滞术(GONB)对慢性偏头痛患者的疗效,重点关注局麻药与安慰剂相比的影响:方法:按照 PRISMA 原则和 Cochrane 协作方法进行了荟萃分析和系统综述。符合条件的研究包括病例对照、队列和随机对照试验,研究对象为慢性偏头痛成人患者,符合《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版(ICHD3)。主要疗效结果包括头痛频率、持续时间和强度以及安全性评估:结果:通过多个数据库的文献检索,我们获得了八项定性分析研究,其中五项纳入了最终的定量分析。据报道,与安慰剂相比,在使用局麻药进行 GONB 治疗的第一和第二个月中,头痛的强度和频率明显降低。干预组和安慰剂组的不良反应发生率没有明显差异:分析强调了 GONB 的安全性和有效性,但由于研究数量有限且样本量相对较小,因此需要谨慎解释。本研究主张进一步研究探索各种药物、频率和治疗方案,以提高 GONB 用于慢性偏头痛治疗的稳健性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信