Prevention of Heart Failure in Hypertension—the Role of Coronary Heart Disease Events Treated With Versus Without Revascularization: The ALLHAT Study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"Prevention of Heart Failure in Hypertension—the Role of Coronary Heart Disease Events Treated With Versus Without Revascularization: The ALLHAT Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In modern clinical practice, less than half of patients with new-onset heart failure (HF) undergo ischemic evaluation and only a minority undergo revascularization. We aimed to assess the proportion of the effect of hypertension (antihypertensive treatment) on incident HF to be eliminated by prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) event treated with or without revascularization, considering possible treatment-mediator interaction. The causal mediation analysis of Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) included 42,418 participants (age 66.9 ± 7.7, 35.6% black, 53.2% men). A new CHD event (myocardial infarction or angina) that occurred after randomization but before the incident HF outcome was the mediator. Incident symptomatic congestive HF (CHF) and hospitalized/fatal HF (HHF) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Logistic regression (for mediator) and Cox proportional hazards regression (for outcome) were adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular disease history, and risk factors. During a median 4.5-year follow-up, 2,785 patients developed CHF, including 2,216 HHF events. Participants who developed CHD events had twice the higher incidence rate of CHF than CHD-free (28.5 vs 13.9 events/1,000 person-years). The proportion of reference interaction indicating direct harm because of a CHD event for lisinopril (234% for CHF, 355% for HHF) and amlodipine (244% for CHF, 468% for HHF) was greater than for chlortalidone (143% for CHF, 269% for HHF). In patients with revascularized CHD events, chlortalidone and amlodipine eliminated 21% to 24% and lisinopril eliminated −45% of HHF. Antihypertensive treatment could not eliminate harm from CHD events treated without revascularization. In conclusion, the antihypertensive drugs (chlortalidone, lisinopril, and amlodipine) prevent HF not principally by preventing CHD events but by way of other pathways. HF is moderated but not mediated by CHD events. Revascularization of CHD events is paramount for HF prevention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924006489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In modern clinical practice, less than half of patients with new-onset heart failure (HF) undergo ischemic evaluation and only a minority undergo revascularization. We aimed to assess the proportion of the effect of hypertension (antihypertensive treatment) on incident HF to be eliminated by prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) event treated with or without revascularization, considering possible treatment-mediator interaction. The causal mediation analysis of Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) included 42,418 participants (age 66.9 ± 7.7, 35.6% black, 53.2% men). A new CHD event (myocardial infarction or angina) that occurred after randomization but before the incident HF outcome was the mediator. Incident symptomatic congestive HF (CHF) and hospitalized/fatal HF (HHF) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Logistic regression (for mediator) and Cox proportional hazards regression (for outcome) were adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular disease history, and risk factors. During a median 4.5-year follow-up, 2,785 patients developed CHF, including 2,216 HHF events. Participants who developed CHD events had twice the higher incidence rate of CHF than CHD-free (28.5 vs 13.9 events/1,000 person-years). The proportion of reference interaction indicating direct harm because of a CHD event for lisinopril (234% for CHF, 355% for HHF) and amlodipine (244% for CHF, 468% for HHF) was greater than for chlortalidone (143% for CHF, 269% for HHF). In patients with revascularized CHD events, chlortalidone and amlodipine eliminated 21% to 24% and lisinopril eliminated −45% of HHF. Antihypertensive treatment could not eliminate harm from CHD events treated without revascularization. In conclusion, the antihypertensive drugs (chlortalidone, lisinopril, and amlodipine) prevent HF not principally by preventing CHD events but by way of other pathways. HF is moderated but not mediated by CHD events. Revascularization of CHD events is paramount for HF prevention.

预防高血压性心力衰竭--冠心病事件在血管重建与非血管重建治疗中的作用:ALLHAT 研究。
在现代临床实践中,不到一半的新发心力衰竭(HF)患者会接受缺血性评估,只有少数患者会接受血管重建手术。我们的目的是评估高血压(降压治疗)对心力衰竭事件的影响中,有多大比例的影响是通过接受或不接受血管重建治疗来预防冠心病事件而消除的,同时考虑到治疗与介导因素之间可能存在的相互作用。ALLHAT的因果中介分析包括42418名参与者(年龄为66.9±7.7岁;35.6%为黑人,53.2%为男性)。随机分组后但在发生高血压结果之前发生的新的冠心病事件(心肌梗死或心绞痛)是中介因素。事件性症状性充血性高血压(CHF)和住院/致命性高血压(HHF)是主要和次要结局。根据人口统计学、心血管疾病史和风险因素对逻辑回归(介导因素)和 Cox 比例危险度回归(结果)进行了调整。在中位 4.5 年的随访期间,2785 名患者出现了心房颤动,其中包括 2216 例 HHF 事件。发生慢性心肌梗死事件的参与者的慢性心肌梗死发病率是无慢性心肌梗死者的两倍(28.5 vs 13.9 事件/1,000 人-年)。利辛普利(CHF:234%;HHF:355%)和氨氯地平(CHF:244%;HHF:468%)的参考交互作用表明因CHD事件造成直接伤害的比例高于氯沙坦(CHF:143%;HHF:269%)。在发生血管再通的冠心病事件的患者中,氯塞酮和氨氯地平消除了 21-24% 的 HHF,而赖新普利则消除了 45% 的 HHF。抗高血压治疗无法消除未接受血管重建治疗的冠心病事件所造成的危害。总之,抗高血压药物(氯沙利酮、利辛普利、氨氯地平)预防心房颤动主要不是通过预防冠心病事件,而是通过其他途径。心房颤动是缓和的,但不是由冠心病事件介导的。冠心病事件的血管重建对于预防高血压至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信