Handgrip strength: A simple and effective tool to recognize decreased intrinsic capacity in Chinese older adults

IF 3.9
{"title":"Handgrip strength: A simple and effective tool to recognize decreased intrinsic capacity in Chinese older adults","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2024.112567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Intrinsic capacity impairment results in poor outcomes among older adults. Here we tested handgrip strength as a screening tool for IC impairment in community-dwelling older adults in Xinjiang, China. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and established optimal cut-off points for handgrip strength in the detection of intrinsic capacity impairment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 1072 participants were included using a multilevel random sampling method. Intrinsic capacity was constructed according to the definition of the Integrated Care for Older People screening tool proposed by the WHO.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Altogether, 73.4 % (787/1072) participants had intrinsic capacity impairment. The prevalence of intrinsic capacity impairment for hearing, vision, mobility, cognition, psychological, and vitality domains was 8.6 %, 4.8 %, 39.6 %, 47.3 %, 12.0 %, and 18.8 %, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios [95 % confidence interval) for handgrip strength was 0.935 [0.914–0.956]. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve for handgrip strength of older men, and handgrip strength of older women with intrinsic capacity impairment were 0.7278, and 0.7534, respectively. The handgrip strength cut-off points were 28.47 kg (60–69 years), 25.76 kg (70–79 years), and 24.45 kg (≥80 years) for men, and 20.75 kg (60–69 years), 19.90 kg (70–79 years), and 16.17 kg (≥80 years) for women.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Handgrip strength can be used as a convenient tool for evaluating intrinsic capacity. Weak handgrip strength and low education level were associated with intrinsic capacity impairment in community-dwelling older adults in Xinjiang. Using the cut-off points of handgrip strength for different age groups and genders, older adults with impaired intrinsic capacity can be identified, which may reduce the occurrence of adverse outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524002134/pdfft?md5=6baaf4f4f6f5c6368aff30316725ab68&pid=1-s2.0-S0531556524002134-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524002134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Intrinsic capacity impairment results in poor outcomes among older adults. Here we tested handgrip strength as a screening tool for IC impairment in community-dwelling older adults in Xinjiang, China. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and established optimal cut-off points for handgrip strength in the detection of intrinsic capacity impairment.

Methods

In total, 1072 participants were included using a multilevel random sampling method. Intrinsic capacity was constructed according to the definition of the Integrated Care for Older People screening tool proposed by the WHO.

Results

Altogether, 73.4 % (787/1072) participants had intrinsic capacity impairment. The prevalence of intrinsic capacity impairment for hearing, vision, mobility, cognition, psychological, and vitality domains was 8.6 %, 4.8 %, 39.6 %, 47.3 %, 12.0 %, and 18.8 %, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios [95 % confidence interval) for handgrip strength was 0.935 [0.914–0.956]. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve for handgrip strength of older men, and handgrip strength of older women with intrinsic capacity impairment were 0.7278, and 0.7534, respectively. The handgrip strength cut-off points were 28.47 kg (60–69 years), 25.76 kg (70–79 years), and 24.45 kg (≥80 years) for men, and 20.75 kg (60–69 years), 19.90 kg (70–79 years), and 16.17 kg (≥80 years) for women.

Conclusions

Handgrip strength can be used as a convenient tool for evaluating intrinsic capacity. Weak handgrip strength and low education level were associated with intrinsic capacity impairment in community-dwelling older adults in Xinjiang. Using the cut-off points of handgrip strength for different age groups and genders, older adults with impaired intrinsic capacity can be identified, which may reduce the occurrence of adverse outcomes.

握力:识别中国老年人内在能力下降的简单有效工具。
目标:内在能力受损会导致老年人生活质量下降。在此,我们测试了将手握力作为筛查中国新疆社区老年人内在能力障碍的工具。我们评估了手握力在检测内在能力损伤方面的诊断准确性,并确定了手握力的最佳临界点:方法:采用多层次随机抽样方法,共纳入 1072 名参与者。内在能力是根据世界卫生组织提出的老年人综合护理筛查工具的定义构建的:共有 73.4%(787/1072)的参与者存在内在能力障碍。听力、视力、行动能力、认知能力、心理和活力领域的内在能力受损发生率分别为 8.6%、4.8%、39.6%、47.3%、12.0% 和 18.8%。手握力的调整后几率比(95% 置信区间)为 0.935 [0.914-0.956]。有内在能力障碍的老年男性的手握力和老年女性的手握力的接收者操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.7278 和 0.7534。男性的手握力临界点分别为 28.47 千克(60-69 岁)、25.76 千克(70-79 岁)和 24.45 千克(≥80 岁),女性的手握力临界点分别为 20.75 千克(60-69 岁)、19.90 千克(70-79 岁)和 16.17 千克(≥80 岁):手握力可作为评估内在能力的便捷工具。新疆社区老年人手握力弱和受教育程度低与内在能力受损有关。利用不同年龄组和性别的手握力分界点,可以识别出内在能力受损的老年人,从而减少不良后果的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信