"Beyond the letter of the law": A critical discourse analysis of social rights take-up in social work.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sharon Razon, Guy Feldman
{"title":"\"Beyond the letter of the law\": A critical discourse analysis of social rights take-up in social work.","authors":"Sharon Razon, Guy Feldman","doi":"10.1037/ort0000787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social work is considered a human rights-based profession. One of the major domains wherein social workers advance human rights involves carrying out actions directed at ensuring the realization of social rights of underprivileged service users. However, empirical knowledge about the actual everyday practice of social rights take-up in social work contexts is still scarce. Guided by scholarship on social rights advocacy and social work discourse, this study explores how take-up of rights discourse is manifested in social workers' advocacy efforts on behalf of their marginalized service users. To do so, the study draws on 30 rights take-up letters written by practitioners in departments of social services in Israel, relating mainly to users' right to housing, an adequate standard of living, and health care. A critical discourse analysis of the letters shows that in their efforts to secure the rights of service users, social workers primarily employed three discursive moves: <i>discourse of individual responsibility, discourse of charity,</i> and <i>clinical discourse.</i> Additional findings show that very few letters used <i>human rights discourse.</i> We conclude by offering a structural explanation for social workers' reliance on discourses that depoliticize the idea and practice of securing people's social rights. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social work is considered a human rights-based profession. One of the major domains wherein social workers advance human rights involves carrying out actions directed at ensuring the realization of social rights of underprivileged service users. However, empirical knowledge about the actual everyday practice of social rights take-up in social work contexts is still scarce. Guided by scholarship on social rights advocacy and social work discourse, this study explores how take-up of rights discourse is manifested in social workers' advocacy efforts on behalf of their marginalized service users. To do so, the study draws on 30 rights take-up letters written by practitioners in departments of social services in Israel, relating mainly to users' right to housing, an adequate standard of living, and health care. A critical discourse analysis of the letters shows that in their efforts to secure the rights of service users, social workers primarily employed three discursive moves: discourse of individual responsibility, discourse of charity, and clinical discourse. Additional findings show that very few letters used human rights discourse. We conclude by offering a structural explanation for social workers' reliance on discourses that depoliticize the idea and practice of securing people's social rights. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

"超越法律条文":对社会工作中社会权利使用情况的批判性话语分析。
社会工作被认为是以人权为基础的职业。社会工作者推进人权的主要领域之一是开展行动,确保弱势服务对象实现社会权利。然而,有关在社会工作背景下落实社会权利的日常实际做法的实证知识仍然很少。本研究以社会权利倡导和社会工作话语的学术研究为指导,探讨社会工作者在代表其边缘化服务对象开展倡导工作时如何体现对权利话语的采纳。为此,本研究参考了以色列社会服务部门从业人员撰写的 30 封权利诉求信件,主要涉及用户的住房权、适足生活水准权和医疗保健权。对这些信件的批判性话语分析显示,在努力确保服务使用者的权利时,社会工作者主要采用了三种话语方式:个人责任话语、慈善话语和临床话语。其他研究结果表明,只有极少数信件使用了人权话语。最后,我们从结构上解释了社工对话语的依赖,这些话语将确保人们社会权利的理念和实践非政治化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信