A Scoring System for Predicting Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kent R Kraus, Joshua W Flores, James E Slaven, Ishani Sharma, Payton K Arnold, Brian H Mullis, Roman M Natoli
{"title":"A Scoring System for Predicting Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures.","authors":"Kent R Kraus, Joshua W Flores, James E Slaven, Ishani Sharma, Payton K Arnold, Brian H Mullis, Roman M Natoli","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Femoral shaft nonunion negatively affects patient quality of life. Although multiple risk factors have been identified for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, there is no quantitative model for predicting nonunion.</p><p><strong>Study description: </strong>The study is a retrospective cohort study of patients with femoral shaft fractures treated at two level one trauma centers who were followed to fracture union or nonunion. Patient, injury, and surgical characteristics were analyzed to create a quantitative model for nonunion risk after intramedullary nailing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight hundred one patients aged 18 years and older with femoral shaft fractures treated with reamed, locked IMNs were identified. Risk factors including demographics, comorbidities, surgical variables, and injury-related characteristics were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was conducted, and several variables were included in a scoring system to predict nonunion risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall nonunion rate was 7.62% (61/801). Multivariate analysis showed significant association among pulmonary injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19, P = 0.022), open fracture (OR=2.36, P = 0.02), current smoking (OR=3.05, P < 0.001), postoperative infection (OR=12.1, P = 0.007), AO/OTA fracture pattern type A or B (OR=0.43, P = 0.014), and percent cortical contact obtained intraoperatively ≥25% (OR=0.41, P = 0.021) and nonunion. The scoring system created to quantitatively stratify nonunion risk showed that a score of 3 or more yielded an OR of 6.38 for nonunion (c-statistic = 0.693, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Femoral shaft nonunion risk is quantifiable based on several independent injury, patient, and surgical factors. This scoring system is an additional tool for clinical decision making when caring for patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with IMNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Femoral shaft nonunion negatively affects patient quality of life. Although multiple risk factors have been identified for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, there is no quantitative model for predicting nonunion.

Study description: The study is a retrospective cohort study of patients with femoral shaft fractures treated at two level one trauma centers who were followed to fracture union or nonunion. Patient, injury, and surgical characteristics were analyzed to create a quantitative model for nonunion risk after intramedullary nailing.

Methods: Eight hundred one patients aged 18 years and older with femoral shaft fractures treated with reamed, locked IMNs were identified. Risk factors including demographics, comorbidities, surgical variables, and injury-related characteristics were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was conducted, and several variables were included in a scoring system to predict nonunion risk.

Results: The overall nonunion rate was 7.62% (61/801). Multivariate analysis showed significant association among pulmonary injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19, P = 0.022), open fracture (OR=2.36, P = 0.02), current smoking (OR=3.05, P < 0.001), postoperative infection (OR=12.1, P = 0.007), AO/OTA fracture pattern type A or B (OR=0.43, P = 0.014), and percent cortical contact obtained intraoperatively ≥25% (OR=0.41, P = 0.021) and nonunion. The scoring system created to quantitatively stratify nonunion risk showed that a score of 3 or more yielded an OR of 6.38 for nonunion (c-statistic = 0.693, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Femoral shaft nonunion risk is quantifiable based on several independent injury, patient, and surgical factors. This scoring system is an additional tool for clinical decision making when caring for patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with IMNs.

预测股骨柄骨折髓内钉愈合后不愈合的评分系统
简介股骨干不愈合会对患者的生活质量造成负面影响。虽然已发现髓内钉(IMN)固定后股骨柄不愈合的多种风险因素,但目前还没有预测不愈合的定量模型:该研究是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在两家一级创伤中心接受治疗的股骨干骨折患者,对他们进行了骨折愈合或不愈合随访。通过分析患者、伤情和手术特征,建立了髓内钉治疗后不愈合风险的定量模型:研究确定了 81 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的股骨干骨折患者,他们都接受了带铰链的锁定髓内钉治疗。对包括人口统计学、合并症、手术变量和损伤相关特征在内的风险因素进行了评估。进行了多变量分析,并将多个变量纳入评分系统,以预测不愈合风险:总的不愈合率为7.62%(61/801)。多变量分析显示肺损伤(几率比 [OR] = 2.19,P = 0.022)、开放性骨折(OR=2.36,P = 0.02)、当前吸烟(OR=3.05,P < 0.001)、术后感染(OR=12.1,P=0.007)、AO/OTA 骨折模式 A 型或 B 型(OR=0.43,P=0.014)、术中获得的皮质接触百分率≥25%(OR=0.41,P=0.021)和不愈合。为定量划分骨不连风险而创建的评分系统显示,评分达到或超过3分时,骨不连的OR值为6.38(c统计量=0.693,P<0.0001):股骨干不愈合风险可根据几个独立的损伤、患者和手术因素进行量化。该评分系统是治疗接受IMN治疗的股骨干骨折患者时临床决策的又一工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信