“It's my Home away from Home:” A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring decision-making experiences of choosing a freestanding birth centre for perinatal care

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Erin K. George , Sarah Dominique , Whitney Irie , Joyce K. Edmonds
{"title":"“It's my Home away from Home:” A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring decision-making experiences of choosing a freestanding birth centre for perinatal care","authors":"Erin K. George ,&nbsp;Sarah Dominique ,&nbsp;Whitney Irie ,&nbsp;Joyce K. Edmonds","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>The high-value, midwifery-led birth centre (BC) model of care is underutilized in the United States, a country with high rates of obstetric intervention and maternal morbidity and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Birth setting decision-making is a complex, preference-sensitive, and resource-dependent process. Understanding how people choose BCs for care may help increase the utilization of BCs and generate positive perinatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study explores the decision-making experiences of people with Medicaid insurance who chose to give birth in a BC in Massachusetts by gathering interview data to interpret and provide meaning about their selection of birth setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed a hermeneutic phenomenology study to interview people about their decision to give birth in a BC. Interview data were coded using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to interpret and provide meaning.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Twelve women participated in the study. Five themes emerged that described participants’ decision-making processes: 1) Stepping Away from “the System,” 2) Decision-Making with External Influences, 3) Accessing BC Care, 4) Finding a Home at the BC, and 5) Decision-Making as a Temporal Process.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The decision to choose a BC was a dynamic process that occurred over time and was influenced by factors such as the quality of care, accessibility, external influences, and the physical environment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Prioritizing an individual's capacity to choose their birth setting and fostering awareness about options in the context of informed decision-making are pivotal steps toward attaining equity in perinatal health. Securing public insurance coverage and equitable reimbursement for BCs represent essential policies aimed at facilitating universal access to the BC model for all people.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661382400247X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

The high-value, midwifery-led birth centre (BC) model of care is underutilized in the United States, a country with high rates of obstetric intervention and maternal morbidity and mortality.

Background

Birth setting decision-making is a complex, preference-sensitive, and resource-dependent process. Understanding how people choose BCs for care may help increase the utilization of BCs and generate positive perinatal outcomes.

Aim

This study explores the decision-making experiences of people with Medicaid insurance who chose to give birth in a BC in Massachusetts by gathering interview data to interpret and provide meaning about their selection of birth setting.

Methods

We employed a hermeneutic phenomenology study to interview people about their decision to give birth in a BC. Interview data were coded using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to interpret and provide meaning.

Findings

Twelve women participated in the study. Five themes emerged that described participants’ decision-making processes: 1) Stepping Away from “the System,” 2) Decision-Making with External Influences, 3) Accessing BC Care, 4) Finding a Home at the BC, and 5) Decision-Making as a Temporal Process.

Discussion

The decision to choose a BC was a dynamic process that occurred over time and was influenced by factors such as the quality of care, accessibility, external influences, and the physical environment.

Conclusion

Prioritizing an individual's capacity to choose their birth setting and fostering awareness about options in the context of informed decision-making are pivotal steps toward attaining equity in perinatal health. Securing public insurance coverage and equitable reimbursement for BCs represent essential policies aimed at facilitating universal access to the BC model for all people.

"这是我的家外之家:"一项诠释学现象学研究,探索选择独立分娩中心进行围产期护理的决策经验。
问题:在产科干预率、孕产妇发病率和死亡率都很高的美国,以助产士为主导的高价值分娩中心(BC)护理模式未得到充分利用:背景:选择分娩环境是一个复杂、对偏好敏感且依赖资源的过程。目的:本研究通过收集访谈数据,探讨马萨诸塞州拥有医疗补助保险并选择在 BC 分娩的人群的决策经验,以解释他们对分娩环境选择的意义:方法:我们采用诠释现象学研究方法,就人们选择在 BC 分娩的决定进行访谈。采用演绎-归纳混合法对访谈数据进行编码,并使用反思性主题分析法对其进行分析,以解释和提供意义:12 名妇女参与了研究。出现了五个主题来描述参与者的决策过程:1) 远离 "系统";2) 在外部影响下做出决策;3) 获得 BC 护理;4) 在 BC 找到家;5) 决策是一个时间过程:讨论:选择 BC 的决定是一个动态过程,会随着时间的推移而发生,并受到护理质量、可及性、外部影响和物理环境等因素的影响:结论:优先考虑个人选择分娩环境的能力,并在知情决策的背景下提高对各种选择的认识,是实现围产期保健公平的关键步骤。确保公共保险的覆盖范围以及对产前护理的公平补偿是旨在促进所有人普遍使用产前护理模式的重要政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信