“It's my Home away from Home:” A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring decision-making experiences of choosing a freestanding birth centre for perinatal care
Erin K. George , Sarah Dominique , Whitney Irie , Joyce K. Edmonds
{"title":"“It's my Home away from Home:” A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring decision-making experiences of choosing a freestanding birth centre for perinatal care","authors":"Erin K. George , Sarah Dominique , Whitney Irie , Joyce K. Edmonds","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>The high-value, midwifery-led birth centre (BC) model of care is underutilized in the United States, a country with high rates of obstetric intervention and maternal morbidity and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Birth setting decision-making is a complex, preference-sensitive, and resource-dependent process. Understanding how people choose BCs for care may help increase the utilization of BCs and generate positive perinatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study explores the decision-making experiences of people with Medicaid insurance who chose to give birth in a BC in Massachusetts by gathering interview data to interpret and provide meaning about their selection of birth setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed a hermeneutic phenomenology study to interview people about their decision to give birth in a BC. Interview data were coded using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to interpret and provide meaning.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Twelve women participated in the study. Five themes emerged that described participants’ decision-making processes: 1) Stepping Away from “the System,” 2) Decision-Making with External Influences, 3) Accessing BC Care, 4) Finding a Home at the BC, and 5) Decision-Making as a Temporal Process.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The decision to choose a BC was a dynamic process that occurred over time and was influenced by factors such as the quality of care, accessibility, external influences, and the physical environment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Prioritizing an individual's capacity to choose their birth setting and fostering awareness about options in the context of informed decision-making are pivotal steps toward attaining equity in perinatal health. Securing public insurance coverage and equitable reimbursement for BCs represent essential policies aimed at facilitating universal access to the BC model for all people.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661382400247X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Problem
The high-value, midwifery-led birth centre (BC) model of care is underutilized in the United States, a country with high rates of obstetric intervention and maternal morbidity and mortality.
Background
Birth setting decision-making is a complex, preference-sensitive, and resource-dependent process. Understanding how people choose BCs for care may help increase the utilization of BCs and generate positive perinatal outcomes.
Aim
This study explores the decision-making experiences of people with Medicaid insurance who chose to give birth in a BC in Massachusetts by gathering interview data to interpret and provide meaning about their selection of birth setting.
Methods
We employed a hermeneutic phenomenology study to interview people about their decision to give birth in a BC. Interview data were coded using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to interpret and provide meaning.
Findings
Twelve women participated in the study. Five themes emerged that described participants’ decision-making processes: 1) Stepping Away from “the System,” 2) Decision-Making with External Influences, 3) Accessing BC Care, 4) Finding a Home at the BC, and 5) Decision-Making as a Temporal Process.
Discussion
The decision to choose a BC was a dynamic process that occurred over time and was influenced by factors such as the quality of care, accessibility, external influences, and the physical environment.
Conclusion
Prioritizing an individual's capacity to choose their birth setting and fostering awareness about options in the context of informed decision-making are pivotal steps toward attaining equity in perinatal health. Securing public insurance coverage and equitable reimbursement for BCs represent essential policies aimed at facilitating universal access to the BC model for all people.
问题:在产科干预率、孕产妇发病率和死亡率都很高的美国,以助产士为主导的高价值分娩中心(BC)护理模式未得到充分利用:背景:选择分娩环境是一个复杂、对偏好敏感且依赖资源的过程。目的:本研究通过收集访谈数据,探讨马萨诸塞州拥有医疗补助保险并选择在 BC 分娩的人群的决策经验,以解释他们对分娩环境选择的意义:方法:我们采用诠释现象学研究方法,就人们选择在 BC 分娩的决定进行访谈。采用演绎-归纳混合法对访谈数据进行编码,并使用反思性主题分析法对其进行分析,以解释和提供意义:12 名妇女参与了研究。出现了五个主题来描述参与者的决策过程:1) 远离 "系统";2) 在外部影响下做出决策;3) 获得 BC 护理;4) 在 BC 找到家;5) 决策是一个时间过程:讨论:选择 BC 的决定是一个动态过程,会随着时间的推移而发生,并受到护理质量、可及性、外部影响和物理环境等因素的影响:结论:优先考虑个人选择分娩环境的能力,并在知情决策的背景下提高对各种选择的认识,是实现围产期保健公平的关键步骤。确保公共保险的覆盖范围以及对产前护理的公平补偿是旨在促进所有人普遍使用产前护理模式的重要政策。