Use of intranasal and sublingual analgesia in children and adolescents in the paediatric emergency department.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Giorgio Cozzi, Sara Chiappa, Giovanna La Fauci, Matteo Calvi, Emanuele Castagno, Eleonora Tappi, Giovanna Villa, Paola Tommasi, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Marta Cellai Rustici, Maria Luisa Casciana, Nicola Tovaglieri, Stefano Masi, Cesare Vezzoli, Sofia Zeuditù Tilatti, Manuela Giangreco, Egidio Barbi, Franca Benini
{"title":"Use of intranasal and sublingual analgesia in children and adolescents in the paediatric emergency department.","authors":"Giorgio Cozzi, Sara Chiappa, Giovanna La Fauci, Matteo Calvi, Emanuele Castagno, Eleonora Tappi, Giovanna Villa, Paola Tommasi, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Marta Cellai Rustici, Maria Luisa Casciana, Nicola Tovaglieri, Stefano Masi, Cesare Vezzoli, Sofia Zeuditù Tilatti, Manuela Giangreco, Egidio Barbi, Franca Benini","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence showing that the intranasal and sublingual routes are safe and effective in providing analgesia, no data are available about their day-to-day use in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of the use of the intranasal and sublingual routes, and the clinical characteristics of the patients receiving analgesia through these routes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre study was performed in the EDs participating in the Pain in Paediatric Emergency Room research group. It included a survey and a retrospective data collection in which the medical records of all patients who received analgesia from 1 April 2022 to 31 May 2022 were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 centres (91%) answered the survey. The intranasal and sublingual routes were used in 25 centres (52%). 13 centres (27%) used both routes, 9 centres (19%) used only the sublingual and 3 centres (6%) used only the intranasal route.12 centres (48%) participated in the retrospective study. Data about 3409 patients, median age 9 years (IQR 5-12), were collected. Among them, 337 patients (9.6%) received sublingual analgesia, and 87 patients (2.5%) received intranasal analgesia. The intranasal route was employed for injuries in 79 (90.8%) cases, and fentanyl was the drug delivered in 85 (97.7%) cases. The sublingual route was used mainly for injuries (57.3%), but also for abdominal pain (15.4%), musculoskeletal pain (14.5%) and headache (10.7%). Paracetamol, ketorolac and tramadol were administered through this route.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the intranasal and sublingual routes for analgesia in the paediatric ED is still limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence showing that the intranasal and sublingual routes are safe and effective in providing analgesia, no data are available about their day-to-day use in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of the use of the intranasal and sublingual routes, and the clinical characteristics of the patients receiving analgesia through these routes.

Methods: A multicentre study was performed in the EDs participating in the Pain in Paediatric Emergency Room research group. It included a survey and a retrospective data collection in which the medical records of all patients who received analgesia from 1 April 2022 to 31 May 2022 were collected.

Results: 48 centres (91%) answered the survey. The intranasal and sublingual routes were used in 25 centres (52%). 13 centres (27%) used both routes, 9 centres (19%) used only the sublingual and 3 centres (6%) used only the intranasal route.12 centres (48%) participated in the retrospective study. Data about 3409 patients, median age 9 years (IQR 5-12), were collected. Among them, 337 patients (9.6%) received sublingual analgesia, and 87 patients (2.5%) received intranasal analgesia. The intranasal route was employed for injuries in 79 (90.8%) cases, and fentanyl was the drug delivered in 85 (97.7%) cases. The sublingual route was used mainly for injuries (57.3%), but also for abdominal pain (15.4%), musculoskeletal pain (14.5%) and headache (10.7%). Paracetamol, ketorolac and tramadol were administered through this route.

Conclusions: The use of the intranasal and sublingual routes for analgesia in the paediatric ED is still limited.

在儿科急诊室对儿童和青少年使用鼻内和舌下镇痛。
背景:尽管有证据表明鼻内和舌下途径镇痛安全有效,但目前还没有关于这两种途径在急诊科(ED)日常使用情况的数据。本研究旨在评估鼻内和舌下途径的使用频率,以及通过这些途径接受镇痛的患者的临床特征:在参与儿科急诊室疼痛研究小组的急诊室开展了一项多中心研究。研究包括一项调查和一项回顾性数据收集,收集了2022年4月1日至2022年5月31日期间接受镇痛治疗的所有患者的医疗记录:48个中心(91%)回答了调查。25个中心(52%)使用了鼻内和舌下途径。13个中心(27%)同时使用两种途径,9个中心(19%)仅使用舌下途径,3个中心(6%)仅使用鼻内途径。研究收集了 3409 名患者的数据,中位年龄为 9 岁(IQR 5-12)。其中,337 名患者(9.6%)接受舌下镇痛,87 名患者(2.5%)接受鼻内镇痛。79例(90.8%)伤员采用鼻内途径,85例(97.7%)伤员使用芬太尼给药。舌下途径主要用于外伤(57.3%),但也用于腹痛(15.4%)、肌肉骨骼疼痛(14.5%)和头痛(10.7%)。扑热息痛、酮洛酸和曲马多都是通过这一途径给药的:结论:在儿科急诊室使用鼻内和舌下途径进行镇痛的情况仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信