Comparison of weight loss interventions in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Arashi Shahid, Aricia Jieqi Thirumaran, Robin Christensen, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Marius Henriksen, Jocelyn L Bowden, David J Hunter
{"title":"Comparison of weight loss interventions in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Arashi Shahid, Aricia Jieqi Thirumaran, Robin Christensen, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Marius Henriksen, Jocelyn L Bowden, David J Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To ascertain the comparative effectiveness of weight-loss strategies for osteoarthritis (OA) to develop rational treatment algorithms aimed at improving OA-related symptoms in overweight/obese individuals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2023 for observational studies and randomized trials. Network meta-analyses were performed using a frequentist approach. Effect sizes for pain and function were computed as standardized mean differences, while change in body weight was computed as mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 RCTs on knee OA (KOA) (2800 participants) with 7 interventions: diet (D); exercise (E); diet and exercise (DE); pharmacological (L); psychological (P); psychological, diet, and exercise (PDE); and Mediterranean diets (M) were networked. For weight change (kg), all interventions significantly outperformed control comparators, with effect sizes ranging from -11.2 (95% CI, -16.0, -6.5 kg) for the most effective approach (PDE) to -4.7 (95% CI, -6.7, -2.7 kg) for the least effective approach (DE). In terms of pain (0-20 scale), only DE outperformed control comparators (-2.2, 95% CI: -4.1, -0.21), whereas PDE was not superior to control comparators (-3.9, 95% CI: -8.4, 0.5) in improving the pain. Regardless of the chosen intervention, prediction intervals from meta-regression analysis indicate that significant pain relief may be anticipated when patients achieve at least a weight reduction of 7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PDE and DE interventions may offer the most effective approach for weight loss, potentially leading to improvements in pain and physical function among overweight/obese individuals with KOA if they achieve more than 7% weight loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the comparative effectiveness of weight-loss strategies for osteoarthritis (OA) to develop rational treatment algorithms aimed at improving OA-related symptoms in overweight/obese individuals.

Design: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2023 for observational studies and randomized trials. Network meta-analyses were performed using a frequentist approach. Effect sizes for pain and function were computed as standardized mean differences, while change in body weight was computed as mean differences.

Results: 13 RCTs on knee OA (KOA) (2800 participants) with 7 interventions: diet (D); exercise (E); diet and exercise (DE); pharmacological (L); psychological (P); psychological, diet, and exercise (PDE); and Mediterranean diets (M) were networked. For weight change (kg), all interventions significantly outperformed control comparators, with effect sizes ranging from -11.2 (95% CI, -16.0, -6.5 kg) for the most effective approach (PDE) to -4.7 (95% CI, -6.7, -2.7 kg) for the least effective approach (DE). In terms of pain (0-20 scale), only DE outperformed control comparators (-2.2, 95% CI: -4.1, -0.21), whereas PDE was not superior to control comparators (-3.9, 95% CI: -8.4, 0.5) in improving the pain. Regardless of the chosen intervention, prediction intervals from meta-regression analysis indicate that significant pain relief may be anticipated when patients achieve at least a weight reduction of 7%.

Conclusions: PDE and DE interventions may offer the most effective approach for weight loss, potentially leading to improvements in pain and physical function among overweight/obese individuals with KOA if they achieve more than 7% weight loss.

对患有膝骨关节炎的超重和肥胖成人进行减肥干预的比较:随机试验的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
目的:确定减肥策略对骨关节炎(OA)的比较效果:确定减肥策略对骨关节炎(OA)的比较效果,以制定合理的治疗方案,改善超重/肥胖者的 OA 相关症状:设计:检索了 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science 从开始到 2023 年 6 月的观察性研究和随机试验。采用频数主义方法进行网络荟萃分析。疼痛和功能的效应大小按标准化平均差(SMD)计算,体重变化按平均差计算:结果:13 项关于膝关节 OA(KOA)的 RCT(2,800 名参与者)与 7 项干预措施进行了联网:饮食(D);运动(E);饮食和运动(DE);药物(L);心理(P);心理、饮食和运动(PDE);地中海饮食(M)。就体重变化(公斤)而言,所有干预措施的效果都明显优于对照组,效果大小从最有效方法(PDE)的-11.2(95% CI,-16.0,-6.5公斤)到最无效方法(DE)的-4.7(95% CI,-6.7,-2.7公斤)不等。在疼痛(0-20 级)方面,只有 DE 的效果优于对照组比较者(-2.2,95% CI:-4.1,-0.21),而 PDE 在改善疼痛方面并不优于对照组比较者(-3.9,95% CI:-8.4,0.5)。无论选择哪种干预措施,元回归分析得出的预测区间表明,当患者体重至少减轻 7% 时,疼痛可望得到明显缓解:PDE和DE干预可能是最有效的减肥方法,如果体重减轻7%以上,KOA超重/肥胖患者的疼痛和身体功能可能会得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
802
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信