A systematic literature review of the clinical and socioeconomic burden of bronchiectasis.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-09-04 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0049-2024
James D Chalmers, Marcus A Mall, Pamela J McShane, Kim G Nielsen, Michal Shteinberg, Sean D Sullivan, Sanjay H Chotirmall
{"title":"A systematic literature review of the clinical and socioeconomic burden of bronchiectasis.","authors":"James D Chalmers, Marcus A Mall, Pamela J McShane, Kim G Nielsen, Michal Shteinberg, Sean D Sullivan, Sanjay H Chotirmall","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0049-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The overall burden of bronchiectasis on patients and healthcare systems has not been comprehensively described. Here, we present the findings of a systematic literature review that assessed the clinical and socioeconomic burden of bronchiectasis with subanalyses by aetiology (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023404162).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications relating to bronchiectasis disease burden (December 2017-December 2022). Journal articles and congress abstracts reporting on observational studies, randomised controlled trials and registry studies were included. Editorials, narrative reviews and systematic literature reviews were included to identify primary studies. PRISMA guidelines were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1585 unique publications were identified, of which 587 full texts were screened and 149 were included. A further 189 citations were included from reference lists of editorials and reviews, resulting in 338 total publications. Commonly reported symptoms and complications included dyspnoea, cough, wheezing, sputum production, haemoptysis and exacerbations. Disease severity across several indices and increased mortality compared with the general population was reported. Bronchiectasis impacted quality of life across several patient-reported outcomes, with patients experiencing fatigue, anxiety and depression. Healthcare resource utilisation was considerable and substantial medical costs related to hospitalisations, treatments and emergency department and outpatient visits were accrued. Indirect costs included sick pay and lost income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bronchiectasis causes significant clinical and socioeconomic burden. Disease-modifying therapies that reduce symptoms, improve quality of life and reduce both healthcare resource utilisation and overall costs are needed. Further systematic analyses of specific aetiologies and paediatric disease may provide more insight into unmet therapeutic needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0049-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The overall burden of bronchiectasis on patients and healthcare systems has not been comprehensively described. Here, we present the findings of a systematic literature review that assessed the clinical and socioeconomic burden of bronchiectasis with subanalyses by aetiology (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023404162).

Methods: Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications relating to bronchiectasis disease burden (December 2017-December 2022). Journal articles and congress abstracts reporting on observational studies, randomised controlled trials and registry studies were included. Editorials, narrative reviews and systematic literature reviews were included to identify primary studies. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

Results: 1585 unique publications were identified, of which 587 full texts were screened and 149 were included. A further 189 citations were included from reference lists of editorials and reviews, resulting in 338 total publications. Commonly reported symptoms and complications included dyspnoea, cough, wheezing, sputum production, haemoptysis and exacerbations. Disease severity across several indices and increased mortality compared with the general population was reported. Bronchiectasis impacted quality of life across several patient-reported outcomes, with patients experiencing fatigue, anxiety and depression. Healthcare resource utilisation was considerable and substantial medical costs related to hospitalisations, treatments and emergency department and outpatient visits were accrued. Indirect costs included sick pay and lost income.

Conclusions: Bronchiectasis causes significant clinical and socioeconomic burden. Disease-modifying therapies that reduce symptoms, improve quality of life and reduce both healthcare resource utilisation and overall costs are needed. Further systematic analyses of specific aetiologies and paediatric disease may provide more insight into unmet therapeutic needs.

关于支气管扩张症的临床和社会经济负担的系统性文献综述。
背景:支气管扩张症对患者和医疗系统造成的总体负担尚未得到全面描述。在此,我们介绍一项系统性文献综述的结果,该综述评估了支气管扩张症的临床和社会经济负担,并按病因进行了子分析(PROSPERO 注册:CRD42023404162):在 Embase、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中检索与支气管扩张疾病负担相关的出版物(2017 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月)。纳入了报告观察性研究、随机对照试验和登记研究的期刊论文和大会摘要。社论、叙事性综述和系统性文献综述也被纳入其中,以确定主要研究。结果确定了 1585 篇独特的出版物,其中筛选了 587 篇全文,收录了 149 篇。此外,还从社论和综述的参考文献列表中纳入了 189 篇引文,因此共有 338 篇出版物。常见的症状和并发症包括呼吸困难、咳嗽、喘息、痰液分泌、咯血和病情加重。据报道,与普通人群相比,几种指数的疾病严重程度和死亡率都有所上升。支气管扩张症影响了患者报告的多项生活质量,患者会感到疲劳、焦虑和抑郁。医疗资源的利用率相当高,住院、治疗、急诊和门诊花费了大量医疗费用。间接成本包括病假工资和收入损失:结论:支气管扩张症造成了巨大的临床和社会经济负担。我们需要能够减轻症状、改善生活质量并减少医疗资源使用和总体成本的疾病调节疗法。对特定病因和儿科疾病的进一步系统分析可能会让我们更深入地了解尚未满足的治疗需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信