Can stimulus checks to households save the local economy? The impact of South Korea’s COVID-19 stimulus on small business sales

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jihee Kim, Susang Lee
{"title":"Can stimulus checks to households save the local economy? The impact of South Korea’s COVID-19 stimulus on small business sales","authors":"Jihee Kim,&nbsp;Susang Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During economic downturns, stimulus checks are often used to help households but may fail to reach the most affected sectors, such as local small businesses during COVID-19. Although the aggregate impact of these measures is well-studied, their distributional effects on local economies are less explored. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, this study examines weekly local sales data during 2020 from Gyeonggi and Incheon, South Korea, to assess the impact of Gyeonggi’s stimulus, distributed to every household for spending exclusively at local stores, contrasting with Incheon’s lack of such stimulus. We find that Gyeonggi’s stimulus initially boosted local sales by 4.5%, though this impact gradually diminished. This translates into a local-sales multiplier of 1.09, indicating that more than distributed stimulus was spent due to spillover and propagation effects in local in-person spending. Our findings emphasize the importance of tailored fiscal policy designs and assessing the distributional impacts of fiscal measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 159-176"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002091/pdfft?md5=eacdf7d80e273ba06d470b1e0c16ed0f&pid=1-s2.0-S0313592624002091-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During economic downturns, stimulus checks are often used to help households but may fail to reach the most affected sectors, such as local small businesses during COVID-19. Although the aggregate impact of these measures is well-studied, their distributional effects on local economies are less explored. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, this study examines weekly local sales data during 2020 from Gyeonggi and Incheon, South Korea, to assess the impact of Gyeonggi’s stimulus, distributed to every household for spending exclusively at local stores, contrasting with Incheon’s lack of such stimulus. We find that Gyeonggi’s stimulus initially boosted local sales by 4.5%, though this impact gradually diminished. This translates into a local-sales multiplier of 1.09, indicating that more than distributed stimulus was spent due to spillover and propagation effects in local in-person spending. Our findings emphasize the importance of tailored fiscal policy designs and assessing the distributional impacts of fiscal measures.

给家庭的刺激性支票能拯救当地经济吗?韩国 COVID-19 刺激措施对小企业销售的影响
在经济衰退期间,经济刺激支票通常用于帮助家庭,但可能无法惠及受影响最严重的部门,如 COVID-19 期间的地方小企业。虽然这些措施的总体影响已得到充分研究,但其对地方经济的分配影响却鲜有探讨。本研究采用差异分析法,研究了 2020 年韩国京畿道和仁川的每周当地销售数据,以评估京畿道刺激措施的影响,京畿道的刺激措施是向每个家庭发放的,只限在当地商店消费,而仁川则没有此类刺激措施。我们发现,京畿道的刺激措施最初将当地销售额提高了 4.5%,但这种影响逐渐减弱。这相当于 1.09 的本地销售乘数,表明由于本地个人消费的溢出效应和传播效应,支出超过了分配的刺激措施。我们的研究结果强调了有针对性的财政政策设计和评估财政措施对分配影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信