Sex-based differences in candidacy for transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Allison O. Dumitriu Carcoana BA, Christopher B. Scoma MD, Sebastian N. Maletz BS, Jose A. Malavet BS, Charissa A. Bloom BS, Daniela R. Crousillat MD, Fadi A. Matar MD
{"title":"Sex-based differences in candidacy for transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention","authors":"Allison O. Dumitriu Carcoana BA,&nbsp;Christopher B. Scoma MD,&nbsp;Sebastian N. Maletz BS,&nbsp;Jose A. Malavet BS,&nbsp;Charissa A. Bloom BS,&nbsp;Daniela R. Crousillat MD,&nbsp;Fadi A. Matar MD","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Women have a higher prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and present at more advanced stages as compared with men. Given the high operative mortality associated with tricuspid valve (TV) surgery, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) have emerged as a promising treatment option. We explored sex-based differences among patients with significant TR who would be expected to be eligible for TTVI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Between March 2021–2022, 12,677 unique adult patients underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram at our tertiary care institution. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected for patients with more than moderate TR. The 2021 European Society of Cardiology valve guidelines were used to retrospectively define sub-populations who would have been eligible for TTVI, TV surgery, or medical therapy. Patients were grouped by sex and compared using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Pearson chi-square, and Cox regression for survival analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 569 patients, 52% (296/569) were female. Men had a higher prevalence of left ventricular dysfunction (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), mitral regurgitation (<i>p</i> = 0.023), and signs of heart failure (New York Heart Association stage III (<i>p</i> = 0.031)). Women had more isolated TR (<i>p</i> = 0.020) and TR due to severe pulmonary hypertension (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Most patients (74.6% of women, 76.9% of men) were precluded from both transcatheter and surgical intervention due to advanced disease. 10.8% of women and 9.2% of men would have qualified for TTVI (<i>p</i> = 0.511).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The majority of patients with significant TR presenting to a tertiary care center are not eligible for TTVI. Sex is not a predictor of eligibility for TTVI among patients with significant TR.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"104 4","pages":"800-811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Women have a higher prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and present at more advanced stages as compared with men. Given the high operative mortality associated with tricuspid valve (TV) surgery, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) have emerged as a promising treatment option. We explored sex-based differences among patients with significant TR who would be expected to be eligible for TTVI.

Methods

Between March 2021–2022, 12,677 unique adult patients underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram at our tertiary care institution. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected for patients with more than moderate TR. The 2021 European Society of Cardiology valve guidelines were used to retrospectively define sub-populations who would have been eligible for TTVI, TV surgery, or medical therapy. Patients were grouped by sex and compared using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Pearson chi-square, and Cox regression for survival analysis.

Results

Of 569 patients, 52% (296/569) were female. Men had a higher prevalence of left ventricular dysfunction (p < 0.001), mitral regurgitation (p = 0.023), and signs of heart failure (New York Heart Association stage III (p = 0.031)). Women had more isolated TR (p = 0.020) and TR due to severe pulmonary hypertension (p < 0.001). Most patients (74.6% of women, 76.9% of men) were precluded from both transcatheter and surgical intervention due to advanced disease. 10.8% of women and 9.2% of men would have qualified for TTVI (p = 0.511).

Conclusion

The majority of patients with significant TR presenting to a tertiary care center are not eligible for TTVI. Sex is not a predictor of eligibility for TTVI among patients with significant TR.

经导管三尖瓣介入手术候选者的性别差异。
背景:与男性相比,女性三尖瓣反流(TR)的发病率较高,且发病阶段更晚。鉴于三尖瓣(TV)手术的死亡率较高,经导管三尖瓣介入治疗(TTVI)已成为一种很有前景的治疗方法。我们探讨了预计有资格接受经导管三尖瓣介入治疗的重大TR患者的性别差异:2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,12,677 名成年患者在我们的三级医疗机构接受了经胸超声心动图检查。我们收集了中度以上 TR 患者的临床和超声心动图数据。我们使用 2021 年欧洲心脏病学会瓣膜指南来回顾性地定义符合 TTVI、TV 手术或药物治疗条件的亚群。患者按性别分组,并使用t检验、Wilcoxon秩和、Pearson卡方和Cox回归进行生存分析比较:569名患者中,52%(296/569)为女性。男性左心室功能障碍的发生率更高(P在三级医疗中心就诊的大多数严重 TR 患者都不符合 TTVI 的条件。性别并不是重大 TR 患者是否符合 TTVI 的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信