Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Residual Nodal Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16143-6
Jessica N Limberg, Tyler Jones, Samantha M Thomas, Koumani W Ntowe, Juliet C Dalton, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Ton Wang, Jennifer K Plichta, Laura H Rosenberger, Maggie L DiNome, Akiko Chiba
{"title":"Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Residual Nodal Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.","authors":"Jessica N Limberg, Tyler Jones, Samantha M Thomas, Koumani W Ntowe, Juliet C Dalton, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Ton Wang, Jennifer K Plichta, Laura H Rosenberger, Maggie L DiNome, Akiko Chiba","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16143-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is evolving but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care for patients with residual nodal disease. The results of the Alliance A011202 trial evaluating the oncologic safety of ALND omission in this cohort are pending but we hypothesize that ALND omission is already increasing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with cT1-3N1M0 breast cancer who underwent NAC and had residual nodal disease (ypN1mi-2) from 2012 to 2021. Temporal trends in omission of completion ALND were assessed annually. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify factors associated with ALND omission and overall survival (OS), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6101 patients were included; the majority presented with cT2 disease (57%), with 69% HER2+, 23% triple-negative, and 8% hormone receptor-positive/HER2-. Overall, 34% underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone. Rates of ALND were the lowest in the last 4 years of observation. After adjustment, treatment at community centers (vs. academic) and lower pathologic nodal burden were associated with omission of ALND. ALND omission was associated with a higher unadjusted OS (5-year OS: 86% SLNB alone vs. 84% ALND; log-rank p = 0.03), however this association was not maintained after adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the impending release of the Alliance A011202 results, omission of ALND in patients with residual nodal disease after NAC is increasing. This practice appears more prominent in community centers and in patients with a lower burden of residual nodal disease. No association with OS was noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"8813-8820"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16143-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is evolving but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care for patients with residual nodal disease. The results of the Alliance A011202 trial evaluating the oncologic safety of ALND omission in this cohort are pending but we hypothesize that ALND omission is already increasing.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with cT1-3N1M0 breast cancer who underwent NAC and had residual nodal disease (ypN1mi-2) from 2012 to 2021. Temporal trends in omission of completion ALND were assessed annually. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify factors associated with ALND omission and overall survival (OS), respectively.

Results: A total of 6101 patients were included; the majority presented with cT2 disease (57%), with 69% HER2+, 23% triple-negative, and 8% hormone receptor-positive/HER2-. Overall, 34% underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone. Rates of ALND were the lowest in the last 4 years of observation. After adjustment, treatment at community centers (vs. academic) and lower pathologic nodal burden were associated with omission of ALND. ALND omission was associated with a higher unadjusted OS (5-year OS: 86% SLNB alone vs. 84% ALND; log-rank p = 0.03), however this association was not maintained after adjustment.

Conclusions: Despite the impending release of the Alliance A011202 results, omission of ALND in patients with residual nodal disease after NAC is increasing. This practice appears more prominent in community centers and in patients with a lower burden of residual nodal disease. No association with OS was noted.

Abstract Image

新辅助化疗后结节病残留患者无需进行腋窝淋巴结切除术
背景:新辅助化疗(NAC)后的腋窝管理在不断发展,但腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)仍是残留结节病患者的标准治疗方法。联盟 A011202 试验评估了在该队列中省略 ALND 的肿瘤安全性,其结果尚未公布,但我们推测省略 ALND 的情况已经在增加:我们查询了国家癌症数据库,以确定 2012 年至 2021 年期间确诊为 cT1-3N1M0 乳腺癌并接受 NAC 且有残余结节病(ypN1mi-2)的患者。每年对遗漏完成 ALND 的时间趋势进行评估。采用多变量逻辑和Cox回归模型分别确定与ALND遗漏和总生存率(OS)相关的因素:共纳入了 6101 例患者;大多数患者(57%)患有 cT2 疾病,其中 69% 为 HER2+,23% 为三阴性,8% 为激素受体阳性/HER2-。总体而言,34%的患者仅接受了前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)。ALND率在过去4年的观察中最低。经过调整后,在社区中心(与学术中心相比)接受治疗和较低的病理结节负荷与省略 ALND 相关。省略ALND与较高的未调整OS相关(5年OS:86%单纯SLNB vs. 84% ALND; log-rank p = 0.03),但调整后这种相关性并未保持:结论:尽管联盟 A011202 结果即将公布,但在 NAC 后有残余结节病的患者中忽略 ALND 的情况正在增加。这种做法在社区中心和残留结节病负担较轻的患者中似乎更为突出。没有发现这种做法与 OS 有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信