The Benefits of Future Quantum Accelerometers for Satellite Gravimetry

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
P. Zingerle, M. Romeshkani, J. Haas, T. Gruber, A. Güntner, J. Müller, R. Pail
{"title":"The Benefits of Future Quantum Accelerometers for Satellite Gravimetry","authors":"P. Zingerle,&nbsp;M. Romeshkani,&nbsp;J. Haas,&nbsp;T. Gruber,&nbsp;A. Güntner,&nbsp;J. Müller,&nbsp;R. Pail","doi":"10.1029/2024EA003630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate the benefits of future quantum accelerometers based on cold atom interferometry (CAI) on current and upcoming satellite gravity mission concepts. These mission concepts include satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) in a single-pair (GRACE-like) and double-pair constellation as well as satellite gravity gradiometry (SGG, single satellite, GOCE-like). Regarding instruments, four scenarios are considered: current-generation electrostatic (GRACE-, GOCE-like), next-generation electrostatic, conservative hybrid/CAI and optimistic hybrid/CAI. For SST, it is shown that temporal aliasing poses currently the dominating error source in simulated global gravity field solutions independent of the investigated instrument and constellation. To still quantify the advantages of CAI instruments on the gravity functional itself, additional simulations are performed where the impact of temporal aliasing is synthetically reduced. When neglecting temporal aliasing, future accelerometers in conjunction with future ranging instruments can substantially improve the retrieval performance of the Earth's gravity field (depending on instrument and constellation). These simulation results are further investigated regarding possible benefit for hydrological use cases where these improvements can also be observed (when omitting temporal aliasing). For SGG, it is demonstrated that, with realistic instrument assumptions, one is still mostly insensitive to time-variable gravity and not competitive with the SST principle. However, due to the improved instrument sensitivity of quantum gradiometers compared to the GOCE mission, static gravity field solutions can be improved significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA003630","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA003630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the benefits of future quantum accelerometers based on cold atom interferometry (CAI) on current and upcoming satellite gravity mission concepts. These mission concepts include satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) in a single-pair (GRACE-like) and double-pair constellation as well as satellite gravity gradiometry (SGG, single satellite, GOCE-like). Regarding instruments, four scenarios are considered: current-generation electrostatic (GRACE-, GOCE-like), next-generation electrostatic, conservative hybrid/CAI and optimistic hybrid/CAI. For SST, it is shown that temporal aliasing poses currently the dominating error source in simulated global gravity field solutions independent of the investigated instrument and constellation. To still quantify the advantages of CAI instruments on the gravity functional itself, additional simulations are performed where the impact of temporal aliasing is synthetically reduced. When neglecting temporal aliasing, future accelerometers in conjunction with future ranging instruments can substantially improve the retrieval performance of the Earth's gravity field (depending on instrument and constellation). These simulation results are further investigated regarding possible benefit for hydrological use cases where these improvements can also be observed (when omitting temporal aliasing). For SGG, it is demonstrated that, with realistic instrument assumptions, one is still mostly insensitive to time-variable gravity and not competitive with the SST principle. However, due to the improved instrument sensitivity of quantum gradiometers compared to the GOCE mission, static gravity field solutions can be improved significantly.

Abstract Image

未来量子加速度计对卫星重力测量的益处
我们研究了基于冷原子干涉测量法(CAI)的未来量子加速度计对当前和即将到来的卫星重力任务概念的益处。这些任务概念包括单对(类似于 GRACE)和双对星座中的卫星对卫星跟踪(SST)以及卫星重力梯度测量(SGG,单卫星,类似于 GOCE)。在仪器方面,考虑了四种情况:当前一代静电(类 GRACE、类 GOCE)、下一代静电、保守的混合/CAI 和乐观的混合/CAI。对于 SST,研究表明时间混叠是目前模拟全球重力场解决方案中的主要误差源,与所研究的仪器和星座无关。为了继续量化 CAI 仪器对重力函数本身的优势,还进行了额外的模拟,合成地减少了时间混叠的影响。在忽略时间混叠的情况下,未来的加速度计与未来的测距仪结合使用,可以大大提高地球重力场的检索性能(取决于仪器和星座)。我们将进一步研究这些模拟结果对水文应用案例可能带来的益处,在这些案例中也可以观察到这些改进(当忽略时间混叠时)。对于 SGG,模拟结果表明,在仪器假设符合实际的情况下,SGG 仍然对时间变化的重力不敏感,与 SST 原理相比缺乏竞争力。不过,由于量子梯度仪的仪器灵敏度比 GOCE 任务有所提高,静态重力场解决方案可以得到显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信