Does customer concentration matter in business model value: Threshold effects of carbon emissions and dynamic capabilities?

IF 11.1 1区管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

Technovation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103095

Ruihan Zhang , Xiaodong Li , Xin Yan , Yiwen Bian

{"title":"Does customer concentration matter in business model value: Threshold effects of carbon emissions and dynamic capabilities?","authors":"Ruihan Zhang , Xiaodong Li , Xin Yan , Yiwen Bian","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior studies have examined the relationship between customer concentration and business model value (hereinafter BMV). This research further examines their relationship by introducing the roles of external carbon emissions and internal dynamic capabilities, and identifies the potential threshold effects induced by the roles. Drawing on a sample of Chinese-listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2017, we use a set of regression models, threshold models and robustness checks. The results show that customer concentration is positively related to BMV and carbon emissions modulate a triple-threshold effect on this positive relationship, while dynamic capabilities exhibit threshold effects at both the aggregate and individual levels. This paper provides valuable insights into how firms promote their BMV and achieve carbon neutrality by recognizing the effect of customer concentration on BMV, as well as how firms can leverage their dynamic capabilities to support BMV enhancement and achieve sustainability improvements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103095"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001457","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior studies have examined the relationship between customer concentration and business model value (hereinafter BMV). This research further examines their relationship by introducing the roles of external carbon emissions and internal dynamic capabilities, and identifies the potential threshold effects induced by the roles. Drawing on a sample of Chinese-listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2017, we use a set of regression models, threshold models and robustness checks. The results show that customer concentration is positively related to BMV and carbon emissions modulate a triple-threshold effect on this positive relationship, while dynamic capabilities exhibit threshold effects at both the aggregate and individual levels. This paper provides valuable insights into how firms promote their BMV and achieve carbon neutrality by recognizing the effect of customer concentration on BMV, as well as how firms can leverage their dynamic capabilities to support BMV enhancement and achieve sustainability improvements.

查看原文本刊更多论文

客户集中度对商业模式价值是否重要？碳排放和动态能力的阈值效应？

先前的研究探讨了客户集中度与商业模式价值（以下简称 BMV）之间的关系。本研究通过引入外部碳排放和内部动态能力的作用，进一步考察了二者之间的关系，并识别了外部碳排放和内部动态能力作用所诱发的潜在门槛效应。以 2012 年至 2017 年中国制造业上市公司为样本，我们使用了一组回归模型、门槛模型和稳健性检验。结果表明，客户集中度与 BMV 正相关，碳排放对这种正相关关系具有三重门槛效应，而动态能力在总体和个体层面都表现出门槛效应。本文通过认识客户集中度对 BMV 的影响，以及企业如何利用其动态能力支持 BMV 的提升并实现可持续发展的改善，为企业如何提升其 BMV 并实现碳中和提供了有价值的见解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Technovation 管理科学-工程：工业

CiteScore

15.10

自引率

11.20%

发文量

208

审稿时长

91 days

期刊介绍： The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.