G E Mandoli, M C Pastore, M C Procopio, A Pica, M Vigna, G Benfari, E E Diviggiano, L Martini, S Lunghetti, M Focardi, M Y Henein, M Cameli
{"title":"Unveiling the reliability of left atrial strain measurement: a dedicated speckle tracking software perspective in controls and cases.","authors":"G E Mandoli, M C Pastore, M C Procopio, A Pica, M Vigna, G Benfari, E E Diviggiano, L Martini, S Lunghetti, M Focardi, M Y Henein, M Cameli","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Speckle tracking echocardiography increasingly supports left atrial (LA) strain (LAS) analysis for diagnosis and prognosis of various clinical conditions. Prior limitations, such as the absence of dedicated software, have been overcome by validated ventricular-based software. A newly automated real-time and offline LA-specific software have now become available on echocardiographs and dedicated workstations. This study aimed at comparing LA strain measures obtained from new fully automated software vs. traditional semi-automated ventricular-based methods in different groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Two operators acquired LA images in a mixed population of healthy individuals and patients with pressure overload (hypertension and aortic stenosis) or pressure-volume overload (mitral regurgitation and heart failure). Subjects with prosthetic valves, heart transplant, or atrial fibrillation were excluded. Strain analysis was performed twice by old semi-automated software and new LA dedicated. LAS was then measured online on the scanning echocardiograph. Overall, 100 patients were analysed (41 healthy subjects, 28 pressure overload, 31 volume overload). LAS proved to be highly reproducible with both software. The dedicated method exhibited slightly superior inter- and intra-operator reproducibility. The online software results showed a nearly perfect reproducibility with offline software [intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99 [0.99; 1.00]] in addition to being able to save an average of ∼30 s.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The recently developed fully automated software for dedicated LAS analysis demonstrates excellent inter- and intra-operator reproducibility, making it a reliable and efficient strain calculation method in routine clinical practice. Another advantage of online LAS calculation is time efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Speckle tracking echocardiography increasingly supports left atrial (LA) strain (LAS) analysis for diagnosis and prognosis of various clinical conditions. Prior limitations, such as the absence of dedicated software, have been overcome by validated ventricular-based software. A newly automated real-time and offline LA-specific software have now become available on echocardiographs and dedicated workstations. This study aimed at comparing LA strain measures obtained from new fully automated software vs. traditional semi-automated ventricular-based methods in different groups of patients.
Methods and results: Two operators acquired LA images in a mixed population of healthy individuals and patients with pressure overload (hypertension and aortic stenosis) or pressure-volume overload (mitral regurgitation and heart failure). Subjects with prosthetic valves, heart transplant, or atrial fibrillation were excluded. Strain analysis was performed twice by old semi-automated software and new LA dedicated. LAS was then measured online on the scanning echocardiograph. Overall, 100 patients were analysed (41 healthy subjects, 28 pressure overload, 31 volume overload). LAS proved to be highly reproducible with both software. The dedicated method exhibited slightly superior inter- and intra-operator reproducibility. The online software results showed a nearly perfect reproducibility with offline software [intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99 [0.99; 1.00]] in addition to being able to save an average of ∼30 s.
Conclusion: The recently developed fully automated software for dedicated LAS analysis demonstrates excellent inter- and intra-operator reproducibility, making it a reliable and efficient strain calculation method in routine clinical practice. Another advantage of online LAS calculation is time efficiency.
目的:斑点追踪超声心动图越来越多地支持左心房(LA)应变(LAS)分析,用于各种临床疾病的诊断和预后。以前的局限性,如缺乏专用软件,已被基于心室的有效软件所克服。现在,超声心动图机和专用工作站上已经有了新的自动化实时和离线 LA 专用软件。本研究旨在比较不同组别患者使用新型全自动软件和传统的半自动心室方法获得的 LA 应变测量结果:两名操作员采集了由健康人和压力超负荷(高血压和主动脉瓣狭窄)或压力-容积超负荷(二尖瓣反流和心力衰竭)患者组成的混合人群的 LA 图像。患有人工瓣膜、心脏移植或心房颤动的受试者被排除在外。使用旧的半自动软件和新的 LA 专用软件进行两次应变分析。然后在扫描超声心动图上在线测量 LAS。总共分析了 100 名患者(41 名健康人、28 名压力超负荷者、31 名容量超负荷者)。事实证明,两种软件的 LAS 都具有很高的可重复性。专用方法在操作员之间和操作员内部的重现性略胜一筹。在线软件的结果与离线软件的结果几乎完全一致[类内相关系数 = 0.99 [0.99; 1.00]],而且平均可节省 30 秒:结论:最新开发的全自动 LAS 分析专用软件在操作者之间和操作者内部都具有极佳的可重复性,因此在常规临床实践中是一种可靠、高效的应变计算方法。在线 LAS 计算的另一个优势是时间效率高。