Recurrence following percutaneous exclusion of giant coronary pseudoaneurysm: a case report.

Saibal Mukhopadhyay, Jamal Yusuf, Ankur Gautam, Sanjeev Kathuria, Vishal Batra
{"title":"Recurrence following percutaneous exclusion of giant coronary pseudoaneurysm: a case report.","authors":"Saibal Mukhopadhyay, Jamal Yusuf, Ankur Gautam, Sanjeev Kathuria, Vishal Batra","doi":"10.1186/s43044-024-00546-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergence of coronary giant pseudoaneurysm (PSA) after stent implantation is potentially catastrophic and may end up with life threatening complications if not managed promptly. There is scarcity of data in existing literature with respect to guidelines on the management of coronary PSA following stent implantation. We report the recurrence of coronary PSA following initial percutaneous management of a giant coronary PSA using multiple stent grafts.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 38-year-old male who underwent primary angioplasty of the right coronary artery (RCA) about a month back, presented with dull aching precordial chest pain for the last 15 days. A repeat coronary angiography revealed giant coronary PSA in proximal to mid RCA. Considering the significantly large size of the coronary PSA with symptoms of impending rupture, the giant coronary PSA was successfully excluded by implanting three sequentially coronary stent grafts. However, after one and a half months, the patient again presented with a similar kind of dull aching chest pain. We found a recurrence of coronary PSA in a segment of the coronary artery distal to the portion excluded by stent grafts. This recurrent coronary PSA was once again successfully excluded by redeploying two more stent grafts with the help of a guide extension catheter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this case, vessel wall injury as a result of aggressive post dilatation using an oversized balloon during the index procedure was the contributor to the giant coronary PSA formation. It usually appears early after the index procedure (within 4 weeks). Though the usual strategy used to exclude coronary aneurysm is by using the minimal number of stent grafts (due to the inherent increased risk of restenosis/thrombosis in stent grafts) in post angioplasty traumatic aneurysm it is prudent to exclude the entire damaged artery by placing stent grafts to prevent recurrence in segments with even minimal dilatation on initial evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74993,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","volume":"76 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-024-00546-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergence of coronary giant pseudoaneurysm (PSA) after stent implantation is potentially catastrophic and may end up with life threatening complications if not managed promptly. There is scarcity of data in existing literature with respect to guidelines on the management of coronary PSA following stent implantation. We report the recurrence of coronary PSA following initial percutaneous management of a giant coronary PSA using multiple stent grafts.

Case presentation: A 38-year-old male who underwent primary angioplasty of the right coronary artery (RCA) about a month back, presented with dull aching precordial chest pain for the last 15 days. A repeat coronary angiography revealed giant coronary PSA in proximal to mid RCA. Considering the significantly large size of the coronary PSA with symptoms of impending rupture, the giant coronary PSA was successfully excluded by implanting three sequentially coronary stent grafts. However, after one and a half months, the patient again presented with a similar kind of dull aching chest pain. We found a recurrence of coronary PSA in a segment of the coronary artery distal to the portion excluded by stent grafts. This recurrent coronary PSA was once again successfully excluded by redeploying two more stent grafts with the help of a guide extension catheter.

Conclusions: In this case, vessel wall injury as a result of aggressive post dilatation using an oversized balloon during the index procedure was the contributor to the giant coronary PSA formation. It usually appears early after the index procedure (within 4 weeks). Though the usual strategy used to exclude coronary aneurysm is by using the minimal number of stent grafts (due to the inherent increased risk of restenosis/thrombosis in stent grafts) in post angioplasty traumatic aneurysm it is prudent to exclude the entire damaged artery by placing stent grafts to prevent recurrence in segments with even minimal dilatation on initial evaluation.

经皮排除巨大冠状动脉假性动脉瘤后复发:病例报告。
背景:支架植入术后出现冠状动脉巨大假性动脉瘤(PSA)可能是灾难性的,如果不及时处理,最终可能会出现危及生命的并发症。现有文献中关于支架植入后冠状动脉假性动脉瘤处理指南的数据很少。我们报告了使用多个支架移植物对巨大冠状动脉 PSA 进行初步经皮处理后冠状动脉 PSA 复发的病例:一名 38 岁的男性在一个月前接受了右冠状动脉(RCA)的初级血管成形术,在过去的 15 天里出现心前区钝痛性胸痛。复查冠状动脉造影发现,RCA 近端和中段存在巨大的冠状动脉 PSA。考虑到冠状动脉 PSA 体积明显增大,并伴有即将破裂的症状,通过依次植入三个冠状动脉支架移植物,成功排除了巨大冠状动脉 PSA。然而,一个半月后,患者再次出现类似的胸部钝痛。我们发现冠状动脉 PSA 在支架移植物排除部分的远端复发。在导引延伸导管的帮助下,我们又重新部署了两个支架移植物,再次成功排除了复发的冠状动脉 PSA:在这个病例中,在索引手术中使用过大的球囊进行积极的后扩张导致的血管壁损伤是形成巨大冠状动脉 PSA 的原因。巨型冠状动脉 PSA 通常出现在指数手术后的早期(4 周内)。虽然在血管成形术后创伤性动脉瘤中,排除冠状动脉瘤的通常策略是使用最少数量的支架移植物(因为支架移植物固有的再狭窄/血栓形成风险增加),但谨慎的做法是通过放置支架移植物来排除整个受损动脉,以防止初次评估时即使扩张极小的部分再次发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信