Assessing masseter muscle volume and activity in relation to craniofacial morphology: a 3D CBCT study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alime Okkesim, Melda Misirlioglu
{"title":"Assessing masseter muscle volume and activity in relation to craniofacial morphology: a 3D CBCT study.","authors":"Alime Okkesim, Melda Misirlioglu","doi":"10.1007/s11282-024-00772-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introductions: </strong>Understanding the factors influencing craniofacial structure growth is crucial for addressing craniofacial deformities. This study evaluates masseter muscle volume, activity, and maximum bite force across different skeletal malocclusion groups and aims to evaluate the masseter muscle volume, activity, and maximum bite force (BF) according to different skeletal malocclusion groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to assess masseter muscle volume, activity, and maximum bite force (BF) across different skeletal malocclusion groups in 60 young adults (18-30 years) seeking treatment at Kirikkale University Faculty of Dentistry. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging, radiological measurements, surface electromyography (sEMG), and force sensor measurements were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed significant differences in sEMG measurements based on sagittal classification. Vertical direction groups showed notable results in muscle volume and BF, though no significant differences were observed in sEMG values. A correlation was identified between BF and sEMG, but no correlation was found between muscle volume and other parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings obtained in this study suggest that the significant relationship between EMG and sagittal skeletal classification could be a valuable diagnostic tool. However, concerns about reliability were raised due to uneven distribution in muscle volume and BF among vertical direction groups. The lack of significant results in muscle volume, sEMG, and BF was attributed to CBCT limitations in soft tissue imaging and the small sample size, emphasizing caution in interpreting the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-024-00772-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introductions: Understanding the factors influencing craniofacial structure growth is crucial for addressing craniofacial deformities. This study evaluates masseter muscle volume, activity, and maximum bite force across different skeletal malocclusion groups and aims to evaluate the masseter muscle volume, activity, and maximum bite force (BF) according to different skeletal malocclusion groups.

Methods: This study aimed to assess masseter muscle volume, activity, and maximum bite force (BF) across different skeletal malocclusion groups in 60 young adults (18-30 years) seeking treatment at Kirikkale University Faculty of Dentistry. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging, radiological measurements, surface electromyography (sEMG), and force sensor measurements were employed.

Results: Results revealed significant differences in sEMG measurements based on sagittal classification. Vertical direction groups showed notable results in muscle volume and BF, though no significant differences were observed in sEMG values. A correlation was identified between BF and sEMG, but no correlation was found between muscle volume and other parameters.

Conclusions: The findings obtained in this study suggest that the significant relationship between EMG and sagittal skeletal classification could be a valuable diagnostic tool. However, concerns about reliability were raised due to uneven distribution in muscle volume and BF among vertical direction groups. The lack of significant results in muscle volume, sEMG, and BF was attributed to CBCT limitations in soft tissue imaging and the small sample size, emphasizing caution in interpreting the findings.

Abstract Image

评估与颅面形态有关的颌下肌体积和活动:三维 CBCT 研究。
介绍:了解影响颅面结构生长的因素对于解决颅面畸形问题至关重要。本研究评估了不同骨骼错颌畸形组的颌间肌体积、活动度和最大咬合力,旨在根据不同骨骼错颌畸形组评估颌间肌体积、活动度和最大咬合力(BF):本研究旨在评估在基里卡莱大学牙科学院接受治疗的 60 名年轻成年人(18-30 岁)中不同骨骼错颌畸形组的颌间肌体积、活动度和最大咬合力(BF)。研究采用了锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像、放射学测量、表面肌电图(sEMG)和力传感器测量:结果:结果显示,根据矢状面分类,sEMG 测量结果存在明显差异。垂直方向组在肌肉体积和肌力方面显示出显著结果,但在肌电图值方面未观察到明显差异。BF 和 sEMG 之间存在相关性,但肌肉体积和其他参数之间没有相关性:本研究的结果表明,肌电图与矢状骨骼分类之间的显著关系可作为一种有价值的诊断工具。然而,由于肌肉体积和BF在垂直方向各组间的分布不均,可靠性引起了关注。由于 CBCT 在软组织成像方面的局限性和样本量较小,肌肉体积、sEMG 和 BF 的结果均不明显,因此在解释研究结果时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信