Does Choice of Different Surgical Intervention Play a Role in the Recurrence of Pterygium?

Q4 Medicine
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01
R Yadav, S S Das, S Gupta, N Agrawal
{"title":"Does Choice of Different Surgical Intervention Play a Role in the Recurrence of Pterygium?","authors":"R Yadav, S S Das, S Gupta, N Agrawal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background There are a wide range of pterygium excision techniques in practice. However, choosing the best possible option is an important factor to prevent its recurrence. Objective To compare the recurrence rate of different excision techniques and understand if a surgeon can alter the recurrence rate. Method A retrospective data of pterygium surgeries operated by a surgeon at Sagarmatha Choudhary Eye Hospital, Nepal from the year 2016 to 2018 was investigated for recurrence. The recurrence was measured by an independent Optometrist with the help of clinical photo and slit-lamp examination. A telephonic directory was maintained for every patient's follow up reminder. Result Altogether 916 individuals with mean age 56.20 years had undergone pterygium excision. Bare Sclera 280 (30.56%), Pterygium Extended Conjunctival Transplantation (PERFECT) 305 (33.29%), Conjunctival auto graft (CAG) 262 (28.60%), Simple Pterygium excision 60 (6.55%) and Amniotic Membrane Graft (AMG) 9 (0.98%), jointly formed the total study sample and surgical techniques. Recurrence for Bare sclera was 172 (61.42%), simple pterygium excision 34 (56.66%), Pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation 0 (0%), and conjunctival auto graft 2 (0.76%). Compared conjunctival auto graft with pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation and simple pterygium with bare sclera revealed similar recurrence rate comparatively. The p-value obtained were p = 0.2148 and p = 0.8152 (p > 0.05, 95% CI) respectively. Conclusion The loss of limbal stem cells in Bare sclera technique acts as stimulant for pterygium recurrence, in addition the remains of pterygial matter in simple pterygium excision acts as precursor for recurrence. Pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation indeed acts as barrier but needs fine surgical skills to perform. Conjunctival auto graft can be opted as an alternative technique for minimal recurrence as compared to Pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35493,"journal":{"name":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","volume":"21 83","pages":"254-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There are a wide range of pterygium excision techniques in practice. However, choosing the best possible option is an important factor to prevent its recurrence. Objective To compare the recurrence rate of different excision techniques and understand if a surgeon can alter the recurrence rate. Method A retrospective data of pterygium surgeries operated by a surgeon at Sagarmatha Choudhary Eye Hospital, Nepal from the year 2016 to 2018 was investigated for recurrence. The recurrence was measured by an independent Optometrist with the help of clinical photo and slit-lamp examination. A telephonic directory was maintained for every patient's follow up reminder. Result Altogether 916 individuals with mean age 56.20 years had undergone pterygium excision. Bare Sclera 280 (30.56%), Pterygium Extended Conjunctival Transplantation (PERFECT) 305 (33.29%), Conjunctival auto graft (CAG) 262 (28.60%), Simple Pterygium excision 60 (6.55%) and Amniotic Membrane Graft (AMG) 9 (0.98%), jointly formed the total study sample and surgical techniques. Recurrence for Bare sclera was 172 (61.42%), simple pterygium excision 34 (56.66%), Pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation 0 (0%), and conjunctival auto graft 2 (0.76%). Compared conjunctival auto graft with pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation and simple pterygium with bare sclera revealed similar recurrence rate comparatively. The p-value obtained were p = 0.2148 and p = 0.8152 (p > 0.05, 95% CI) respectively. Conclusion The loss of limbal stem cells in Bare sclera technique acts as stimulant for pterygium recurrence, in addition the remains of pterygial matter in simple pterygium excision acts as precursor for recurrence. Pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation indeed acts as barrier but needs fine surgical skills to perform. Conjunctival auto graft can be opted as an alternative technique for minimal recurrence as compared to Pterygium extended conjunctival transplantation.

选择不同的手术干预对翼状胬肉复发有影响吗?
背景 在实践中有多种翼状胬肉切除技术。然而,选择最佳方案是防止翼状胬肉复发的重要因素。目的 比较不同切除技术的复发率,了解外科医生能否改变复发率。方法 对尼泊尔 Sagarmatha Choudhary 眼科医院一名外科医生在 2016 年至 2018 年期间所做翼状胬肉手术的复发情况进行回顾性数据调查。复发情况由一名独立验光师借助临床照片和裂隙灯检查进行测量。每个患者的随访提醒都有电话记录。结果 共有 916 人接受了翼状胬肉切除术,平均年龄为 56.20 岁。裸巩膜280例(30.56%)、翼状胬肉扩展结膜移植术(PERFECT)305例(33.29%)、结膜自体移植术(CAG)262例(28.60%)、单纯翼状胬肉切除术60例(6.55%)和羊膜移植术(AMG)9例(0.98%)共同构成了研究样本和手术技术。裸巩膜复发 172 例(61.42%),单纯翼状胬肉切除 34 例(56.66%),翼状胬肉扩展结膜移植 0 例(0%),结膜自体移植 2 例(0.76%)。结膜自体移植与翼状胬肉扩展结膜移植和单纯翼状胬肉裸巩膜移植相比,复发率相似。得出的 p 值分别为 p = 0.2148 和 p = 0.8152(p > 0.05,95% CI)。结论 裸巩膜技术中边缘干细胞的缺失是翼状胬肉复发的刺激因素,此外,单纯翼状胬肉切除术中残留的胬肉物质也是翼状胬肉复发的前兆。翼状胬肉扩展结膜移植确实能起到屏障作用,但需要精细的手术技巧才能完成。与翼状胬肉扩展结膜移植术相比,结膜自体移植术可作为复发率最低的替代技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kathmandu University Medical Journal
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信