Vital Pulp Therapy in Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Arwa S Bafail
{"title":"Vital Pulp Therapy in Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Arwa S Bafail","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.b5718325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT) is indicated for management of permanent teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. However, recent research has suggested that vital pulp therapy (VPT) may be a less invasive option in these cases. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of VPT, using hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs) including complete and partial pulpotomies in permanent posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The PRISMA recommendations were adhered to. The search approach used electronic databases from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, ROBINS-I, and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tools were used to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial database search turned up 142 papers, of which 3 prospective cohort studies and 9 randomised controlled trials were selected for analysis. For three, seven, and two articles, the risk of bias was rated as 'high' or 'serious,' 'fair,' and 'low,' respectively. The success rates for VPT using HCSCs typically ranged from 78% to 90% one to five years following VPT. The results of the VPT and NSRCT were equivalent at one and five years, according to two articles. Although the intra-operative pulp assessment is essential for VPT treatments, most studies did not provide a thorough account of this process or the time required to achieve haemostasis. Three studies reported sample sizes that were 23 teeth. The 12 studies that were analysed revealed successful VPT procedures using HCSCs in permanent posterior teeth that had symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, with radiographic success rates ranging from 81% to 90%. Two articles claimed that the results of VPT and root canal therapy were equivalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When considering VPT as an alternative to NSRCT, appropriate case selection and outcome criteria must be created. This data highlights the need for additional studies contrasting the longer-term effects of different treatment regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.b5718325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT) is indicated for management of permanent teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. However, recent research has suggested that vital pulp therapy (VPT) may be a less invasive option in these cases. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of VPT, using hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs) including complete and partial pulpotomies in permanent posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Materials and methods: The PRISMA recommendations were adhered to. The search approach used electronic databases from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, ROBINS-I, and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tools were used to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.

Results: The initial database search turned up 142 papers, of which 3 prospective cohort studies and 9 randomised controlled trials were selected for analysis. For three, seven, and two articles, the risk of bias was rated as 'high' or 'serious,' 'fair,' and 'low,' respectively. The success rates for VPT using HCSCs typically ranged from 78% to 90% one to five years following VPT. The results of the VPT and NSRCT were equivalent at one and five years, according to two articles. Although the intra-operative pulp assessment is essential for VPT treatments, most studies did not provide a thorough account of this process or the time required to achieve haemostasis. Three studies reported sample sizes that were 23 teeth. The 12 studies that were analysed revealed successful VPT procedures using HCSCs in permanent posterior teeth that had symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, with radiographic success rates ranging from 81% to 90%. Two articles claimed that the results of VPT and root canal therapy were equivalent.

Conclusion: When considering VPT as an alternative to NSRCT, appropriate case selection and outcome criteria must be created. This data highlights the need for additional studies contrasting the longer-term effects of different treatment regimens.

对患有症状性不可逆牙髓炎的牙齿进行活力牙髓治疗:系统回顾。
目的:非手术根管疗法(NSRCT)适用于治疗诊断为症状性不可逆牙髓炎的恒牙。然而,最近的研究表明,在这些病例中,活髓疗法(VPT)可能是一种创伤较小的选择。本系统性综述的目的是评估使用硅酸钙水门汀(HCSCs)进行 VPT 治疗的结果,包括对有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎后恒牙进行完全和部分牙髓切断术:遵循 PRISMA 建议。检索方法使用了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和灰色文献中的电子数据库。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表、ROBINS-I 和 Cochrane 协作偏倚风险工具来评估所选研究的质量:最初的数据库搜索发现了 142 篇论文,其中 3 篇前瞻性队列研究和 9 篇随机对照试验被选中进行分析。分别有 3 篇、7 篇和 2 篇文章的偏倚风险被评为 "高 "或 "严重"、"一般 "和 "低"。使用 HCSCs 进行 VPT 的成功率通常介于 78% 到 90% 之间,时间为 VPT 后的一到五年。有两篇文章指出,VPT 和 NSRCT 在一年和五年后的结果相当。虽然术中牙髓评估对 VPT 治疗至关重要,但大多数研究并未对这一过程或实现止血所需的时间进行详尽说明。三项研究报告的样本量为 23 颗牙齿。分析的 12 项研究显示,在有症状的不可逆牙髓炎后恒牙中使用 HCSCs 进行 VPT 治疗取得了成功,放射学成功率从 81% 到 90% 不等。有两篇文章称,VPT 和根管治疗的效果相当:结论:在考虑用 VPT 替代 NSRCT 时,必须制定适当的病例选择和结果标准。这些数据强调了对不同治疗方案的长期效果进行对比的更多研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信