Effectiveness of Nusinersen in Adolescents and Adults with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 3区医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Neurology and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s40120-024-00653-2

Tim Hagenacker, Lorenzo Maggi, Giorgia Coratti, Bora Youn, Stephanie Raynaud, Angela D Paradis, Eugenio Mercuri

{"title":"Effectiveness of Nusinersen in Adolescents and Adults with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tim Hagenacker, Lorenzo Maggi, Giorgia Coratti, Bora Youn, Stephanie Raynaud, Angela D Paradis, Eugenio Mercuri","doi":"10.1007/s40120-024-00653-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Nusinersen clinical trials have limited data on adolescents and adults with 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis to assess effectiveness of nusinersen in adolescents and adults with SMA in clinical practice.Methods: Our search included papers published 12/23/2016 through 07/01/2022 with ≥ 5 individuals ≥ 13 years of age and with ≥ 6 months' data on ≥ 1 selected motor function outcomes [Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE), Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), and Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)]. For meta-analysis, effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. To understand treatment effects by disease severity, subgroup meta-analysis by SMA type and ambulatory status was conducted.Results: Fourteen publications including 539 patients followed up to 24 months met inclusion criteria for the SLR. Patients were age 13-72 years and most (99%) had SMA Type II or III. Modest improvement or stability in motor function was consistently observed at the group level. Significant mean increases from baseline were observed in HFMSE [2.3 points (95% CI 1.3-3.3)] with 32.1% (21.7-44.6) of patients demonstrating a clinically meaningful increase (≥ 3 points) at 18 months. Significant increases in RULM were consistently found, with a mean increase of 1.1 points (0.7-1.4) and 38.3% (30.3-47.1) showing a clinically meaningful improvement (≥ 2 points) at 14 months. Among ambulatory patients, there was a significant increase in mean 6MWT distance of 25.0 m (8.9-41.2) with 50.9% (33.4-68.2) demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement (≥ 30 m) at 14 months. The increases in HFMSE were greater for less severely affected patients, whereas more severely affected patients showed greater improvement in RULM.Conclusions: Findings provide consolidated evidence that nusinersen is effective in improving or stabilizing motor function in many adolescents and adults with a broad spectrum of SMA.","PeriodicalId":19216,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1483-1504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00653-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nusinersen clinical trials have limited data on adolescents and adults with 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis to assess effectiveness of nusinersen in adolescents and adults with SMA in clinical practice.

Methods: Our search included papers published 12/23/2016 through 07/01/2022 with ≥ 5 individuals ≥ 13 years of age and with ≥ 6 months' data on ≥ 1 selected motor function outcomes [Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE), Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), and Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)]. For meta-analysis, effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. To understand treatment effects by disease severity, subgroup meta-analysis by SMA type and ambulatory status was conducted.

Results: Fourteen publications including 539 patients followed up to 24 months met inclusion criteria for the SLR. Patients were age 13-72 years and most (99%) had SMA Type II or III. Modest improvement or stability in motor function was consistently observed at the group level. Significant mean increases from baseline were observed in HFMSE [2.3 points (95% CI 1.3-3.3)] with 32.1% (21.7-44.6) of patients demonstrating a clinically meaningful increase (≥ 3 points) at 18 months. Significant increases in RULM were consistently found, with a mean increase of 1.1 points (0.7-1.4) and 38.3% (30.3-47.1) showing a clinically meaningful improvement (≥ 2 points) at 14 months. Among ambulatory patients, there was a significant increase in mean 6MWT distance of 25.0 m (8.9-41.2) with 50.9% (33.4-68.2) demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement (≥ 30 m) at 14 months. The increases in HFMSE were greater for less severely affected patients, whereas more severely affected patients showed greater improvement in RULM.

Conclusions: Findings provide consolidated evidence that nusinersen is effective in improving or stabilizing motor function in many adolescents and adults with a broad spectrum of SMA.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Nusinersen 对青少年和成人脊髓性肌肉萎缩症患者的疗效：系统回顾与元分析》。

简介：有关5q相关脊髓性肌萎缩症（SMA）青少年和成人患者的纽西奈森临床试验数据有限。我们进行了一项系统性文献综述（SLR）和荟萃分析，以评估纽西奈森在青少年和成人SMA患者临床实践中的有效性：我们的检索纳入了2016年12月23日至2022年1月7日发表的论文，其中≥5名患者年龄≥13岁，且≥6个月的数据中≥1项选定的运动功能结果[哈默史密斯功能运动量表-扩展版（HFMSE）、修订版上肢模块（RULM）和六分钟步行测试（6MWT）]。在进行荟萃分析时，使用随机效应模型对效应大小进行了汇总。为了解不同疾病严重程度的治疗效果，还按SMA类型和非卧床状态进行了分组荟萃分析：14篇文献（包括随访24个月的539名患者）符合SLR的纳入标准。患者年龄在 13-72 岁之间，大多数（99%）为 SMA II 型或 III 型。在组别水平上，运动功能持续得到适度改善或保持稳定。与基线相比，HFMSE 的平均值显著增加[2.3 分（95% CI 1.3-3.3）]，32.1%（21.7-44.6）的患者在 18 个月时表现出有临床意义的增加（≥ 3 分）。RULM持续显著增加，平均增加1.1分（0.7-1.4），38.3%（30.3-47.1）的患者在14个月时显示出有临床意义的改善（≥2分）。在非卧床患者中，6MWT 平均距离显著增加了 25.0 米（8.9-41.2），50.9%（33.4-68.2）的患者在 14 个月时表现出有临床意义的改善（≥ 30 米）。病情较轻的患者HFMSE的增加幅度更大，而病情较重的患者RULM的改善幅度更大：研究结果提供了确凿证据，证明纽西奈森能有效改善或稳定多种 SMA 青少年和成人患者的运动功能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Neurology and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

8.10%

发文量

103

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Aims and Scope Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice. Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice. Open Access All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.