A Comprehensive Review of Bilobed Flaps in Nasal Reconstruction: Technique, Outcomes, and Considerations.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Anne Bennett, Victoria Peters, Anna Meade, James Thornton
{"title":"A Comprehensive Review of Bilobed Flaps in Nasal Reconstruction: Technique, Outcomes, and Considerations.","authors":"Anne Bennett, Victoria Peters, Anna Meade, James Thornton","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reconstruction of nasal defects, particularly in the lower third of the nose, presents significant challenges due to the area's complex 3-dimensional structure and thicker, more sebaceous skin. The bilobed flap, a double transposition flap, has been a popular method for addressing these nasal defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review examines a single surgeon's experience with bilobed flaps for nasal reconstruction over the last 15 years. Demographics, defect characteristics, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, and revisionary procedures were documented, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess complication rate associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 148 bilobed reconstructions were analyzed, with a mean patient age of 62.6 years and 46.0% male prevalence. The most common indication for the procedure was basal cell carcinoma following Mohs surgery, with the majority of the defects located on the lower third of the nose. The average defect size was 1.11 cm². Complications occurred in 52.0% of cases, including pincushioning, scar thickening, asymmetry, alar stenosis, and wound dehiscence. Reoperations and additional treatments such as dermabrasion, steroid injections, and laser therapy were frequently necessary to address these issues. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significantly more postoperative complications when the defect was located on the lower third of the nose when compared with the upper two-thirds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the bilobed flap can provide adequate skin coverage with perfect color match, it is associated with notable complications that impact esthetic outcomes. Proper patient selection and surgical technique are crucial for optimizing results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Reconstruction of nasal defects, particularly in the lower third of the nose, presents significant challenges due to the area's complex 3-dimensional structure and thicker, more sebaceous skin. The bilobed flap, a double transposition flap, has been a popular method for addressing these nasal defects.

Methods: This retrospective review examines a single surgeon's experience with bilobed flaps for nasal reconstruction over the last 15 years. Demographics, defect characteristics, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, and revisionary procedures were documented, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess complication rate associations.

Results: In all, 148 bilobed reconstructions were analyzed, with a mean patient age of 62.6 years and 46.0% male prevalence. The most common indication for the procedure was basal cell carcinoma following Mohs surgery, with the majority of the defects located on the lower third of the nose. The average defect size was 1.11 cm². Complications occurred in 52.0% of cases, including pincushioning, scar thickening, asymmetry, alar stenosis, and wound dehiscence. Reoperations and additional treatments such as dermabrasion, steroid injections, and laser therapy were frequently necessary to address these issues. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significantly more postoperative complications when the defect was located on the lower third of the nose when compared with the upper two-thirds.

Conclusions: While the bilobed flap can provide adequate skin coverage with perfect color match, it is associated with notable complications that impact esthetic outcomes. Proper patient selection and surgical technique are crucial for optimizing results.

鼻重建中双叶皮瓣的全面回顾:技术、效果和注意事项。
目的:由于鼻缺损部位的三维结构复杂,且皮肤较厚、皮脂腺较多,因此鼻缺损的重建,尤其是鼻下三分之一处的鼻缺损,面临着巨大的挑战。双叶皮瓣是一种双转位皮瓣,一直是治疗这些鼻部缺损的常用方法:本回顾性研究考察了一位外科医生在过去 15 年中使用双叶皮瓣进行鼻部重建的经验。记录了人口统计学、缺陷特征、术中细节、术后并发症和翻修手术,并使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析评估并发症发生率的相关性:共分析了148例双叶重建手术,患者平均年龄为62.6岁,男性占46.0%。最常见的手术适应症是莫氏手术后的基底细胞癌,大部分缺损位于鼻子的下三分之一处。平均缺损面积为 1.11 平方厘米。52.0%的病例出现了并发症,包括挤压、疤痕增厚、不对称、鼻翼狭窄和伤口开裂。为了解决这些问题,经常需要进行再次手术和其他治疗,如磨皮、类固醇注射和激光治疗。逻辑回归分析表明,当鼻翼缺损位于鼻翼下1/3处时,术后并发症明显多于鼻翼上2/3处:结论:虽然双叶皮瓣可以提供充分的皮肤覆盖和完美的颜色匹配,但它与影响美学效果的显著并发症有关。正确选择患者和手术技巧对优化效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信