Differences in spinal axial rotation angles during the lumbar-locked rotation test between hyper and normal thoracic rotation groups: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Sun-Shil Shin, Won-Gyu Yoo
{"title":"Differences in spinal axial rotation angles during the lumbar-locked rotation test between hyper and normal thoracic rotation groups: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sun-Shil Shin, Won-Gyu Yoo","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trunk rotation is important in many sporting activities The thoracic spine has reciprocal relationships with the lumbar and pelvic spines, such that reduced flexibility in the lumbar or thoracic spine can lead to abnormal patterns of trunk movement and pain. However, few studies have investigated the relative trunk rotation mobilities of the thorax, lumbar, and pelvis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic rotation angles during the lumbar-locked rotation test between hyper and normal thoracic rotation groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two young, active participants were enrolled in this study. After the attachment of inertial measurement units at the T1, T7, T12, L3, and S2 levels, the participants were required to stand in a comfortable upright posture for 5 s to allow postural measurements before performing the lumbar-locked rotation test. The participants were then divided into hyper thoracic rotation and normal thoracic rotation groups based on T1 angle measurements obtained during the lumbar-locked rotation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hyper thoracic rotation group had significantly higher thoracic rotation angles on both the right (p< 0.05) and left (p< 0.05) sides compared with the normal thoracic rotation group. Furthermore, we observed flat lumbar lordosis in the hyper thoracic rotation group compared with the normal thoracic rotation group, particularly in the lower lumbar region in standing posture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that evaluations of thoracic mobility should consider relative thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic motions, rather than the T1 angle alone. This study provides a basis for health professionals to evaluate movement dysfunctions associated with thoracic hypermobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trunk rotation is important in many sporting activities The thoracic spine has reciprocal relationships with the lumbar and pelvic spines, such that reduced flexibility in the lumbar or thoracic spine can lead to abnormal patterns of trunk movement and pain. However, few studies have investigated the relative trunk rotation mobilities of the thorax, lumbar, and pelvis.

Objective: To compare thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic rotation angles during the lumbar-locked rotation test between hyper and normal thoracic rotation groups.

Methods: Thirty-two young, active participants were enrolled in this study. After the attachment of inertial measurement units at the T1, T7, T12, L3, and S2 levels, the participants were required to stand in a comfortable upright posture for 5 s to allow postural measurements before performing the lumbar-locked rotation test. The participants were then divided into hyper thoracic rotation and normal thoracic rotation groups based on T1 angle measurements obtained during the lumbar-locked rotation test.

Results: The hyper thoracic rotation group had significantly higher thoracic rotation angles on both the right (p< 0.05) and left (p< 0.05) sides compared with the normal thoracic rotation group. Furthermore, we observed flat lumbar lordosis in the hyper thoracic rotation group compared with the normal thoracic rotation group, particularly in the lower lumbar region in standing posture.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that evaluations of thoracic mobility should consider relative thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic motions, rather than the T1 angle alone. This study provides a basis for health professionals to evaluate movement dysfunctions associated with thoracic hypermobility.

在腰椎锁定旋转测试中,胸椎旋转过度组和正常组脊柱轴向旋转角度的差异:横断面研究。
背景:胸椎与腰椎和骨盆脊柱之间存在相互影响的关系,因此腰椎或胸椎灵活性降低会导致躯干运动模式异常和疼痛。然而,很少有研究调查胸椎、腰椎和骨盆的相对躯干旋转活动度:比较胸廓旋转过度组和正常组在腰椎锁定旋转测试中的胸廓、腰椎和骨盆旋转角度:方法:32 名年轻、活跃的参与者参加了这项研究。在 T1、T7、T12、L3 和 S2 水平安装惯性测量单元后,要求参与者以舒适的直立姿势站立 5 秒钟,以便在进行腰椎锁定旋转测试前进行姿势测量。然后,根据腰椎锁定旋转测试中获得的 T1 角度测量结果,将参与者分为胸椎旋转过度组和胸椎旋转正常组:结果:与正常胸廓旋转组相比,过度胸廓旋转组的右侧(p< 0.05)和左侧(p< 0.05)胸廓旋转角度都明显更高。此外,与胸廓旋转正常组相比,我们观察到胸廓旋转过度组的腰椎前凸平坦,尤其是在站立姿势的下腰部:我们的数据表明,对胸廓活动度的评估应考虑胸廓、腰椎和骨盆的相对运动,而不仅仅是 T1 角。这项研究为医疗专业人员评估与胸廓过度活动相关的运动功能障碍提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信