Injury prevention in the US Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting programme.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wendy Shields, Evelyn Shiang, Elise Omaki, Anne Kenney, Andrea C Gielen
{"title":"Injury prevention in the US Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting programme.","authors":"Wendy Shields, Evelyn Shiang, Elise Omaki, Anne Kenney, Andrea C Gielen","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many home-based interventions have been demonstrated to reduce unintentional and intentional injuries in young children aged 0-4 years, but an understanding of their inclusion in federally-funded home visiting programmes in the USA is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study team administered a survey to key informants at each of the 21 home visiting models approved for United States Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program funding being implemented in 2023. Respondents were based across the United States and in other developed countries. The survey collected information about the content used by models to address unintentional injury, parental health/wellbeing, and child abuse/neglect in children aged 0-4 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completed surveys were returned by all respondents (n=21). Most models reported the inclusion of some unintentional injury, parental health/well-being and child abuse/neglect content. While models on average covered four of the five child abuse/neglect topics listed, only five of the nine topics listed for unintentional injury and parental health/well-being were covered. Among the services used by models to address topics, covering content via standardised curriculum and referrals were the most frequent while less than one-quarter of models (n=5) provided families with safety equipment to address unintentional injury. Less than half of the models evaluated outcomes from their injury prevention services, and no models conducted cost-effectiveness evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home visiting programmes are a promising way to reduce injuries in children at high risk, but further development and evaluation of their injury prevention content could increase their impact in the USA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many home-based interventions have been demonstrated to reduce unintentional and intentional injuries in young children aged 0-4 years, but an understanding of their inclusion in federally-funded home visiting programmes in the USA is needed.

Methods: The study team administered a survey to key informants at each of the 21 home visiting models approved for United States Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program funding being implemented in 2023. Respondents were based across the United States and in other developed countries. The survey collected information about the content used by models to address unintentional injury, parental health/wellbeing, and child abuse/neglect in children aged 0-4 years.

Results: Completed surveys were returned by all respondents (n=21). Most models reported the inclusion of some unintentional injury, parental health/well-being and child abuse/neglect content. While models on average covered four of the five child abuse/neglect topics listed, only five of the nine topics listed for unintentional injury and parental health/well-being were covered. Among the services used by models to address topics, covering content via standardised curriculum and referrals were the most frequent while less than one-quarter of models (n=5) provided families with safety equipment to address unintentional injury. Less than half of the models evaluated outcomes from their injury prevention services, and no models conducted cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Conclusions: Home visiting programmes are a promising way to reduce injuries in children at high risk, but further development and evaluation of their injury prevention content could increase their impact in the USA.

美国母婴和幼儿家访计划中的伤害预防。
背景:许多以家庭为基础的干预措施已被证明可减少 0-4 岁幼儿的意外伤害和故意伤害,但需要了解这些干预措施是否被纳入美国联邦政府资助的家访计划:研究小组对获准在 2023 年实施的美国母婴和幼儿家访计划资助的 21 种家访模式中的每一种模式的主要信息提供者进行了调查。受访者来自美国各地和其他发达国家。调查收集了各模式用于解决 0-4 岁儿童意外伤害、父母健康/福祉和虐待/忽视儿童问题的内容:所有受访者(n=21)都交回了填写完整的调查问卷。大多数模型都报告包含了一些意外伤害、父母健康/福祉和虐待/忽视儿童的内容。在所列的五个虐待/忽视儿童主题中,平均有四个被模式所涵盖,而在所列的九个意外伤害和父母健康/福祉主题中,只有五个被模式所涵盖。在各模式用于解决主题的服务中,最常见的是通过标准化课程和转介来涵盖内容,而不到四分之一的模式(n=5)为家庭提供安全设备,以解决意外伤害问题。不到一半的模式对其伤害预防服务的结果进行了评估,没有任何模式进行了成本效益评估:结论:家访计划是减少高风险儿童伤害的一种很有前景的方法,但对其伤害预防内容的进一步开发和评估可提高其在美国的影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信