The value of quantitative shear wave elastography combined with conventional ultrasound in evaluating and guiding fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph node for early breast cancer: implication for axillary surgical stage.
IF 2.9 3区 医学Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xuan Liu, Yi-Ni Huang, Ying-Lan Wu, Xiao-Yao Zhu, Ze-Ming Xie, Jian Li
{"title":"The value of quantitative shear wave elastography combined with conventional ultrasound in evaluating and guiding fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph node for early breast cancer: implication for axillary surgical stage.","authors":"Xuan Liu, Yi-Ni Huang, Ying-Lan Wu, Xiao-Yao Zhu, Ze-Ming Xie, Jian Li","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01407-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the value of conventional ultrasonography (US) combined with quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) in evaluating and identifying target axillary lymph node (TALN) for fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of patients with early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 222 patients with 223 ALNs were prospectively recruited from January 2018 to December 2021. All TALNs were evaluated by US, SWE and subsequently underwent FNAB. The diagnostic performances of US, SWE, UE<sub>or</sub> (either US or SWE was positive) and UE<sub>and</sub> (both US and SWE were positive), and FNAB guided by the above four methods for evaluating ALN status were assessed using receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analyses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses used to determine the independent predictors of axillary burden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnosing ALNs using conventional US and SWE were 0.69 and 0.66, respectively, with sensitivities of 78.00% and 65.00% and specificities of 60.98% and 66.67%. The combined method, UE<sub>or</sub>, demonstrated significantly improved sensitivity of 86.00% (p < 0.001 when compared with US and SWE alone). The AUC of the UE<sub>or</sub>-guided FNAB [0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.90)] was significantly higher than that of US-guided FNAB [0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88), p = 0.042], SWE-guided FNAB [0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84), p = 0.001], and UE<sub>and</sub>-guided FNAB [0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.82), p < 0.001]. Multivariate logistic regression showed that FNAB and number of suspicious ALNs were found independent predictors of axillary burden in patients with early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UE<sub>or</sub> had superior sensitivity compared to US or SWE alone in ALN diagnosis. The UE<sub>or</sub>-guided FNAB achieved a lower false-negative rate compared to FNAB guided solely by US or SWE, which may be a promising tool for the preoperative diagnosis of ALNs in early breast cancer, and had the potential implication for the selection of axillary surgical modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01407-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the value of conventional ultrasonography (US) combined with quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) in evaluating and identifying target axillary lymph node (TALN) for fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of patients with early breast cancer.
Materials and methods: A total of 222 patients with 223 ALNs were prospectively recruited from January 2018 to December 2021. All TALNs were evaluated by US, SWE and subsequently underwent FNAB. The diagnostic performances of US, SWE, UEor (either US or SWE was positive) and UEand (both US and SWE were positive), and FNAB guided by the above four methods for evaluating ALN status were assessed using receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analyses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses used to determine the independent predictors of axillary burden.
Results: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnosing ALNs using conventional US and SWE were 0.69 and 0.66, respectively, with sensitivities of 78.00% and 65.00% and specificities of 60.98% and 66.67%. The combined method, UEor, demonstrated significantly improved sensitivity of 86.00% (p < 0.001 when compared with US and SWE alone). The AUC of the UEor-guided FNAB [0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.90)] was significantly higher than that of US-guided FNAB [0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88), p = 0.042], SWE-guided FNAB [0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84), p = 0.001], and UEand-guided FNAB [0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.82), p < 0.001]. Multivariate logistic regression showed that FNAB and number of suspicious ALNs were found independent predictors of axillary burden in patients with early breast cancer.
Conclusion: The UEor had superior sensitivity compared to US or SWE alone in ALN diagnosis. The UEor-guided FNAB achieved a lower false-negative rate compared to FNAB guided solely by US or SWE, which may be a promising tool for the preoperative diagnosis of ALNs in early breast cancer, and had the potential implication for the selection of axillary surgical modality.
期刊介绍：
BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
