Exploring Zirconia Adhesion: Pre and Postsintering Physical Surface Treatment, Chemical Treatment, and Cement Interactions.

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
BioMed Research International Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5394652
Flávia Gonçalves, Mirko Dennys Ayala-Perez, Francisco Carlos Dos Santos Reis, Walter Gomes Miranda-Júnior, Letícia Cristina Cidreira Boaro
{"title":"Exploring Zirconia Adhesion: Pre and Postsintering Physical Surface Treatment, Chemical Treatment, and Cement Interactions.","authors":"Flávia Gonçalves, Mirko Dennys Ayala-Perez, Francisco Carlos Dos Santos Reis, Walter Gomes Miranda-Júnior, Letícia Cristina Cidreira Boaro","doi":"10.1155/2024/5394652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Adhesion to zirconia remains a significant dental challenge. This study is aimed at assessing the bond strength of zirconia based on surface treatment with pre or postsintering sandblasting associated with different chemical treatments and resin cements. <b>Methods:</b> Zirconia blocks were divided into 12 experimental groups based on the surface treatment (presintering sandblasting or postsintering sandblasting/tribochemical abrasion treatment), chemical treatment (none, Single Bond Universal, or Signum Zirconia Bond), and choice of cement (Panavia F or RelyX™ U200). The bond strength was measured by shear tests using a universal testing machine. The fracture analysis was performed using stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (<i>α</i> = 5%). <b>Results:</b> Triple and double factor's interactions were not significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Regarding the surface treatment factor, the bond strength following postsintering sandblasting treatment associated with tribochemical abrasion (9.15 ± 3.62 MPa) was significantly higher than presintering sandblasting treatment (5.24 ± 3.53 MPa). Concerning the chemical treatment factor, bond strengths were ranked as follows: Signum Zirconia Bond > Single Bond Universal > no treatment. The bond strength of the resin cements did not differ among them. Most fractures (67%) were classified as adhesive, and 32% were categorized as mixed fractures. <b>Conclusion:</b> Surface treatment via postsintering sandblasting combined with tribochemical abrasion demonstrated superior efficacy than in presintering sandblasting. Additionally, chemical treatment with zirconia primer increased the bond strength of zirconia irrespective of the surface physical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5394652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adhesion to zirconia remains a significant dental challenge. This study is aimed at assessing the bond strength of zirconia based on surface treatment with pre or postsintering sandblasting associated with different chemical treatments and resin cements. Methods: Zirconia blocks were divided into 12 experimental groups based on the surface treatment (presintering sandblasting or postsintering sandblasting/tribochemical abrasion treatment), chemical treatment (none, Single Bond Universal, or Signum Zirconia Bond), and choice of cement (Panavia F or RelyX™ U200). The bond strength was measured by shear tests using a universal testing machine. The fracture analysis was performed using stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). Results: Triple and double factor's interactions were not significant (p > 0.05). Regarding the surface treatment factor, the bond strength following postsintering sandblasting treatment associated with tribochemical abrasion (9.15 ± 3.62 MPa) was significantly higher than presintering sandblasting treatment (5.24 ± 3.53 MPa). Concerning the chemical treatment factor, bond strengths were ranked as follows: Signum Zirconia Bond > Single Bond Universal > no treatment. The bond strength of the resin cements did not differ among them. Most fractures (67%) were classified as adhesive, and 32% were categorized as mixed fractures. Conclusion: Surface treatment via postsintering sandblasting combined with tribochemical abrasion demonstrated superior efficacy than in presintering sandblasting. Additionally, chemical treatment with zirconia primer increased the bond strength of zirconia irrespective of the surface physical treatment.

探索氧化锆的附着力:烧结前和烧结后的物理表面处理、化学处理和水泥相互作用。
背景:氧化锆的附着力仍然是牙科的一个重大挑战。本研究旨在根据烧结前或烧结后喷砂的表面处理以及不同的化学处理和树脂水门汀来评估氧化锆的粘接强度。研究方法根据表面处理(烧结前喷砂或烧结后喷砂/三化学研磨处理)、化学处理(无、Single Bond Universal 或 Signum Zirconia Bond)和粘接剂选择(Panavia F 或 RelyX™ U200)将氧化锆块分为 12 个实验组。粘接强度是通过使用万能试验机进行剪切试验测量的。断裂分析采用体视显微镜进行。数据分析采用三方方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α = 5%)。结果显示三因素和双因素的交互作用不显著(P > 0.05)。在表面处理因素方面,与摩擦化学磨损相关的烧结后喷砂处理后的结合强度(9.15 ± 3.62 MPa)明显高于烧结前喷砂处理后的结合强度(5.24 ± 3.53 MPa)。关于化学处理因素,粘接强度的排名如下:Signum氧化锆粘结 > Single Bond Universal > 无处理。树脂水门汀的粘结强度没有差异。大多数骨折(67%)被归类为粘接性骨折,32%被归类为混合性骨折。结论与烧结前喷砂相比,烧结后喷砂结合摩擦化学研磨的表面处理方法具有更好的效果。此外,使用氧化锆底漆进行化学处理可提高氧化锆的粘接强度,而与表面物理处理无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信