Exploring parental thoughts and clinical experiences on blended food in a paediatric population, a qualitative study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
R Verheije, F Carbone, T Bosmans, L Van Scheppingen, K van Hoeve, I Hoffman
{"title":"Exploring parental thoughts and clinical experiences on blended food in a paediatric population, a qualitative study.","authors":"R Verheije, F Carbone, T Bosmans, L Van Scheppingen, K van Hoeve, I Hoffman","doi":"10.51821/87.2.12122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There's a growing interest in blended food (BF) as an alternative to commercial food (CF) for tube-fed children. Thus, we investigated parental and medical experiences with BF as an option for tube feeding in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, all patients were already using BF, chosen by parents. In March 2022, all patients using BF provided consent and completed a questionnaire assessing their experiences. Medical data were collected retrospectively from patient charts, including biometric changes, dietary adjustments, and nutritional status. A non-validated parent satisfaction score was computed from 17 questions, rated on a scale from one to five. A score of ≥ 51 points, indicating an average score of > 3 per question, was deemed indicative of a positive parental experience with BF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine children receiving BF were identified (median age: 4.7 years; weight: 14.9 kg; 66% male). All parents were satisfied with BF, reflected in the parent satisfaction score. Parents cited reduced feeding-related discomforts as the main reason for switching to BF. Weight (+0.3 SD) and length (+0.5 SD) showed positive changes. None discontinued BF, though modifications were made for five patients by the dietician. Nutritional deficiencies, mainly iron with or without zinc deficiency, were observed in four patients, with uncertain onset due to lack of pre-BF laboratory testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small BF cohort overseen by an experienced multidisciplinary team, BF was well tolerated, resulting in high parental satisfaction and maintaining good nutritional status.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/87.2.12122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There's a growing interest in blended food (BF) as an alternative to commercial food (CF) for tube-fed children. Thus, we investigated parental and medical experiences with BF as an option for tube feeding in children.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all patients were already using BF, chosen by parents. In March 2022, all patients using BF provided consent and completed a questionnaire assessing their experiences. Medical data were collected retrospectively from patient charts, including biometric changes, dietary adjustments, and nutritional status. A non-validated parent satisfaction score was computed from 17 questions, rated on a scale from one to five. A score of ≥ 51 points, indicating an average score of > 3 per question, was deemed indicative of a positive parental experience with BF.

Results: Nine children receiving BF were identified (median age: 4.7 years; weight: 14.9 kg; 66% male). All parents were satisfied with BF, reflected in the parent satisfaction score. Parents cited reduced feeding-related discomforts as the main reason for switching to BF. Weight (+0.3 SD) and length (+0.5 SD) showed positive changes. None discontinued BF, though modifications were made for five patients by the dietician. Nutritional deficiencies, mainly iron with or without zinc deficiency, were observed in four patients, with uncertain onset due to lack of pre-BF laboratory testing.

Conclusions: In this small BF cohort overseen by an experienced multidisciplinary team, BF was well tolerated, resulting in high parental satisfaction and maintaining good nutritional status.

一项定性研究,探讨儿科人群中家长对混合食品的想法和临床经验。
背景:人们对混合食品(BF)作为管饲儿童商业食品(CF)的替代品越来越感兴趣。因此,我们调查了家长和医疗人员使用混合食物作为儿童管饲选择的经验:在这项横断面研究中,所有患者均已使用混合食物,由家长选择。2022 年 3 月,所有使用 BF 的患者均表示同意,并填写了一份评估其使用经验的问卷。研究人员从病历中回顾性地收集了医疗数据,包括生物测量变化、饮食调整和营养状况。根据 17 个问题计算出未经验证的家长满意度得分,得分从 1 分到 5 分不等。如果得分≥51分,即每个问题的平均得分大于3分,则表明家长对母乳喂养有积极的体验:结果:9 名儿童接受了婴儿喂养(中位年龄:4.7 岁;体重:14.9 千克;66% 为男性)。所有家长都对婴儿喂养感到满意,家长满意度得分反映了这一点。家长认为,减少喂养相关的不适是改用婴儿喂养的主要原因。体重(+0.3 SD)和身长(+0.5 SD)都出现了积极的变化。尽管营养师对五名患者的喂养方式进行了调整,但没有人中断母乳喂养。有四名患者出现了营养缺乏症,主要是缺铁或缺锌,但由于缺乏 BF 前的实验室检测,起病时间并不确定:在这个由经验丰富的多学科团队监督的小规模婴儿营养餐队列中,婴儿营养餐的耐受性良好,家长满意度高,并保持了良好的营养状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信