Co-production, co-creation or co-design of public space? A systematic review

IF 6 1区经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES

Cities Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105372

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public space is increasingly provided and managed by a variety of actors. In order to describe this phenomenon, several concepts have been used, such as co-production, co-creation and co-design. This paper reviews the existing literature on public space and reveals that these concepts are defined similarly and used interchangeably. Based on a systematic literature review, and aided by bibliometric analysis, the paper attempts to establish transparency regarding current understanding and use of the concepts. By discussing the differences, the paper aims to reduce the ambiguity and increase the clarity of the concepts. The paper concludes by suggesting in which case it would be more appropriate to use which concept.

查看原文本刊更多论文

公共空间的共同生产、共同创造还是共同设计？系统回顾

公共空间越来越多地由各种参与者提供和管理。为了描述这一现象，人们使用了多个概念，如共同生产、共同创造和共同设计。本文回顾了有关公共空间的现有文献，发现这些概念的定义相似，而且可以互换使用。基于系统的文献综述，并辅以文献计量分析，本文试图建立对这些概念的当前理解和使用的透明度。通过讨论不同之处，本文旨在减少概念的模糊性，提高概念的清晰度。最后，本文建议在哪种情况下使用哪种概念更为合适。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cities URBAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

9.00%

发文量

517

期刊介绍： Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.