Optimization of Jiyang depression block X shale condensate reservoir well spacing based on geology–engineering integration

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"Optimization of Jiyang depression block X shale condensate reservoir well spacing based on geology–engineering integration","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ngib.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Appropriate well spacing is crucial for the efficient development of shale reservoirs, as it is closely related to the degree of resource utilization. Well spacing design is influenced by both fracturing processes and geological characteristics. While increasing well density can enhance reservoir recovery, it may lead to higher investment costs and significant well interference issues. In this study, we adopted an integrated geological–engineering approach, combining fracture propagation simulation, EDFM (Embedded Discrete Fracture Modeling), and numerical simulation methods to comprehensively analyze well interference under different well spacings in shale condensate reservoirs. Development well spacing was optimized using the degree of resource utilization and well interference rate as key indicators. There are three main research findings: (1) The geological engineering integration approach allows for differentiated well spacing according to specific research areas. Combining this integrated approach with EDFM and leveraging quantitative evaluation, we have developed an efficient and precise methodology for well spacing optimization. (2) When well spacing is less than the length of hydraulic fractures, inter-well fractures exhibit an entangled pattern, reducing the effectiveness of fracturing treatments and causing severe well interference. As well spacing increases, interference between fractures from different wells diminishes, but unstimulated volumes gradually emerge, leading to a decrease in reservoir recovery. (3) Considering both well interference and resource utilization, a well spacing of 400 m is recommended in the study area. At this spacing, interference between hydraulic fractures from different wells is minimal. After 10 years of production, the estimated reservoir recovery is 39.16%, with a production rate of 25.58% and a well interference rate of 13.58%. These research outcomes provide valuable insights for optimizing the well spacing of hydraulic fractured horizontal wells in shale condensate reservoirs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37116,"journal":{"name":"Natural Gas Industry B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854024000561/pdfft?md5=8bec66d94f665f9e38648801ba39748e&pid=1-s2.0-S2352854024000561-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Gas Industry B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854024000561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Appropriate well spacing is crucial for the efficient development of shale reservoirs, as it is closely related to the degree of resource utilization. Well spacing design is influenced by both fracturing processes and geological characteristics. While increasing well density can enhance reservoir recovery, it may lead to higher investment costs and significant well interference issues. In this study, we adopted an integrated geological–engineering approach, combining fracture propagation simulation, EDFM (Embedded Discrete Fracture Modeling), and numerical simulation methods to comprehensively analyze well interference under different well spacings in shale condensate reservoirs. Development well spacing was optimized using the degree of resource utilization and well interference rate as key indicators. There are three main research findings: (1) The geological engineering integration approach allows for differentiated well spacing according to specific research areas. Combining this integrated approach with EDFM and leveraging quantitative evaluation, we have developed an efficient and precise methodology for well spacing optimization. (2) When well spacing is less than the length of hydraulic fractures, inter-well fractures exhibit an entangled pattern, reducing the effectiveness of fracturing treatments and causing severe well interference. As well spacing increases, interference between fractures from different wells diminishes, but unstimulated volumes gradually emerge, leading to a decrease in reservoir recovery. (3) Considering both well interference and resource utilization, a well spacing of 400 m is recommended in the study area. At this spacing, interference between hydraulic fractures from different wells is minimal. After 10 years of production, the estimated reservoir recovery is 39.16%, with a production rate of 25.58% and a well interference rate of 13.58%. These research outcomes provide valuable insights for optimizing the well spacing of hydraulic fractured horizontal wells in shale condensate reservoirs.

基于地质-工程一体化的济阳凹陷区块 X 页岩凝析气储层井距优化研究
适当的井距对于页岩储层的高效开发至关重要,因为它与资源的利用程度密切相关。井距设计受压裂工艺和地质特征的影响。虽然增加井密度可以提高储层采收率,但可能会导致更高的投资成本和严重的井干扰问题。在这项研究中,我们采用了地质-工程综合方法,结合压裂传播模拟、EDFM(嵌入式离散压裂建模)和数值模拟方法,全面分析了页岩凝析油藏不同井距下的油井干扰问题。以资源利用率和油井干扰率为主要指标,对开发井间距进行了优化。主要研究成果有三项:(1)地质工程集成方法可根据具体研究领域确定不同的井距。将这种综合方法与 EDFM 相结合,并利用定量评价,我们开发出了一种高效、精确的井距优化方法。(2) 当井间距小于水力压裂长度时,井间压裂会呈现纠缠模式,降低压裂处理效果,并造成严重的井间干扰。随着井距的增大,不同井间裂缝的干扰会减弱,但未受刺激的体积会逐渐出现,导致储层采收率下降。(3)考虑到油井干扰和资源利用率,建议研究区的井距为 400 米。在这种井距下,不同油井的水力压裂之间的干扰很小。经过 10 年的生产,预计储层采收率为 39.16%,生产率为 25.58%,油井干扰率为 13.58%。这些研究成果为优化页岩凝析油藏水力压裂水平井的井距提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Gas Industry B
Natural Gas Industry B Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信