Who votes for populist presidential candidates? Differential support among US-based Latin American diasporas

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Konstantin Ash, Anca Turcu
{"title":"Who votes for populist presidential candidates? Differential support among US-based Latin American diasporas","authors":"Konstantin Ash,&nbsp;Anca Turcu","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What explains diaspora support for populist presidential candidates? Existing findings suggest most diaspora voters are less likely to support populist candidates. However, there are notable exceptions among Latin American diasporas. We posit educated diasporas will be less likely to support populist candidates and political socialization in destination countries with successful populists will increase support for populist candidates in origin-country elections. We use origin-country candidate-level election data from 13 Latin American diasporas residing in the United States to test these claims. Our data covers 172 candidates from 45 first-round presidential elections. We connect this voting data to time-variant demographic data from the American Community Survey (ACS) for US respondents born in our thirteen Latin American countries of interest. Our results complicate existing findings as only some diasporas have less support for populist candidates than domestic voters, while others have relatively more support. We find weak origin-country state capacity, manifested by non-reporting of consulate-level election results, explains this variation. Diasporas from weaker states leave earlier in life and are more politically socialized in the destination country, yet likely vote for populists out of a desire to restore order in their country of birth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103182"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What explains diaspora support for populist presidential candidates? Existing findings suggest most diaspora voters are less likely to support populist candidates. However, there are notable exceptions among Latin American diasporas. We posit educated diasporas will be less likely to support populist candidates and political socialization in destination countries with successful populists will increase support for populist candidates in origin-country elections. We use origin-country candidate-level election data from 13 Latin American diasporas residing in the United States to test these claims. Our data covers 172 candidates from 45 first-round presidential elections. We connect this voting data to time-variant demographic data from the American Community Survey (ACS) for US respondents born in our thirteen Latin American countries of interest. Our results complicate existing findings as only some diasporas have less support for populist candidates than domestic voters, while others have relatively more support. We find weak origin-country state capacity, manifested by non-reporting of consulate-level election results, explains this variation. Diasporas from weaker states leave earlier in life and are more politically socialized in the destination country, yet likely vote for populists out of a desire to restore order in their country of birth.

谁为民粹主义总统候选人投票?以美国为基地的拉丁美洲侨民的不同支持率
侨民支持民粹主义总统候选人的原因何在?现有研究结果表明,大多数侨民选民不太可能支持民粹主义候选人。然而,拉丁美洲的侨民中也有明显的例外。我们认为,受过教育的散居国外者支持民粹主义候选人的可能性较小,而在有成功民粹主义者的目的国进行政治社会化会增加原籍国选举中对民粹主义候选人的支持。我们使用 13 个居住在美国的拉美侨民的原籍国候选人选举数据来验证这些说法。我们的数据涵盖了 45 场首轮总统选举中的 172 名候选人。我们将这些投票数据与美国社区调查(American Community Survey,ACS)中出生在 13 个相关拉美国家的美国受访者的时变人口数据联系起来。我们的研究结果使现有结论变得复杂,因为只有一些侨民对民粹主义候选人的支持少于国内选民,而另一些侨民的支持则相对较多。我们发现,原籍国能力薄弱(表现为不报告领事馆一级的选举结果)可以解释这种差异。来自弱小国家的侨民出国较早,在目的国的政治社会化程度较高,但很可能出于恢复出生国秩序的愿望而投票支持民粹主义者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信