Coil Embolization for Cerebral Aneurysm Using Low Pulse Rate Fluoroscopy.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2024-10-15 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0069
Takeshi Shimizu, Shingo Toyota, Tomoaki Murakami, Maki Kobayashi, Haruhiko Kishima
{"title":"Coil Embolization for Cerebral Aneurysm Using Low Pulse Rate Fluoroscopy.","authors":"Takeshi Shimizu, Shingo Toyota, Tomoaki Murakami, Maki Kobayashi, Haruhiko Kishima","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although coil embolization is commonly perceived as a minimally invasive procedure, the associated radiation exposure cannot be disregarded. To date, no specific study has investigated radiation exposure during coil embolization. This study aimed to investigate the potential of lowering the pulse rate to decrease radiation exposure during coil embolization while maintaining patient safety. Radiation data and clinical features of 70 patients who underwent coil embolization between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Since July 2017, the pulse rate was regulated from 7.5 to 4 frames per second (f/s). Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between pulse rate and radiation exposure. Out of the 70 procedures, 30 were performed at the standard pulse rate (7.5 f/s), and 40 were performed at the lower pulse rate (4 f/s). In the lower-pulse-rate group, the absorbed dose to the patient (AK) was 2580.7 (±217) mGy, whereas in the standard-pulse-rate group, it was 4760 (±411.1). Both the dose-area product (DAP) and AK were substantially reduced in the low pulse rate group (p = 0.000002). There was a significant correlation between DAP and AK and pulse rate (p = 0.004, p = 0.0017, respectively). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between pulse rate and perioperative complications. Our findings suggest that using a lower pulse rate (4 f/s) can effectively reduce radiation exposure during coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms while ensuring patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"353-359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although coil embolization is commonly perceived as a minimally invasive procedure, the associated radiation exposure cannot be disregarded. To date, no specific study has investigated radiation exposure during coil embolization. This study aimed to investigate the potential of lowering the pulse rate to decrease radiation exposure during coil embolization while maintaining patient safety. Radiation data and clinical features of 70 patients who underwent coil embolization between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Since July 2017, the pulse rate was regulated from 7.5 to 4 frames per second (f/s). Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between pulse rate and radiation exposure. Out of the 70 procedures, 30 were performed at the standard pulse rate (7.5 f/s), and 40 were performed at the lower pulse rate (4 f/s). In the lower-pulse-rate group, the absorbed dose to the patient (AK) was 2580.7 (±217) mGy, whereas in the standard-pulse-rate group, it was 4760 (±411.1). Both the dose-area product (DAP) and AK were substantially reduced in the low pulse rate group (p = 0.000002). There was a significant correlation between DAP and AK and pulse rate (p = 0.004, p = 0.0017, respectively). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between pulse rate and perioperative complications. Our findings suggest that using a lower pulse rate (4 f/s) can effectively reduce radiation exposure during coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms while ensuring patient safety.

使用低脉率荧光透视对脑动脉瘤进行线圈栓塞治疗。
虽然线圈栓塞通常被认为是一种微创手术,但相关的辐射暴露也不容忽视。迄今为止,还没有专门的研究调查过线圈栓塞术中的辐射暴露。本研究旨在探讨在保证患者安全的前提下,降低脉冲频率以减少线圈栓塞术中辐射暴露的可能性。研究人员回顾性分析了2015年至2020年间接受线圈栓塞术的70名患者的辐射数据和临床特征。自2017年7月起,脉冲速率从每秒7.5帧调节为每秒4帧(f/s)。为研究脉搏率与辐射暴露之间的相关性,进行了统计分析。在 70 例手术中,30 例以标准脉率(7.5 帧/秒)进行,40 例以较低脉率(4 帧/秒)进行。在低脉冲速率组中,患者的吸收剂量(AK)为 2580.7 (±217) mGy,而在标准脉冲速率组中,吸收剂量为 4760 (±411.1) mGy。低脉搏率组的剂量面积乘积(DAP)和 AK 均大幅降低(p = 0.000002)。DAP 和 AK 与脉搏有明显的相关性(分别为 p = 0.004 和 p = 0.0017)。此外,脉搏率与围手术期并发症之间没有明显的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,使用较低的脉率(4 f/s)可有效减少脑动脉瘤线圈栓塞术中的辐射暴露,同时确保患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信