Community-Engaged Implementation Strategies in Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Eunyoung Kang, Julie Chen, Kim L Lipsey, Erin R Foster
{"title":"Community-Engaged Implementation Strategies in Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Eunyoung Kang, Julie Chen, Kim L Lipsey, Erin R Foster","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong> Despite the potential of community-engaged implementation research (CEIR) in developing strategies to accelerate the translation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), there is a noticeable knowledge gap in the current state of CEIR in occupational therapy. A synthesis of the concept, purpose, and operationalization of CEIR is necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To identify the contexts, purposes, and operationalization of CEIR, focusing on implementation strategies in occupational therapy.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong> PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data collection: </strong> We included studies that were explicit and intentional about CEIR and that focused on implementation strategies to support the translation of occupational therapy interventions, clinical guidelines, practice models, theories, or assessments. We extracted the research context (e.g., partners, recruitment), purpose (e.g., why community-engaged research was used), and operationalization (e.g., community engagement [CE] activities, how their findings inform the research) using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong> Of 3,219 records, 6 studies were included. Involved partners were mainly occupational therapy practitioners from existing networks. CEIR that focuses on implementation strategies informs various aspects of research design, ranging from study design to sustainability, by developing community-academia partnerships, building implementation capacity, and creating implementation strategies across diverse research areas. Current research has used various but mostly traditional CE activities (e.g., focus groups).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong> We synthesized evidence on CEIR focused on implementation strategies in occupational therapy. Intentional efforts are needed to collaborate with diverse partners, explore innovative CE activities, produce equitable outputs, and develop multilevel implementation strategies to accelerate the translation of EBIs into practice. Plain-Language Summary: In this review, we synthesize evidence on the contexts, purposes, and operationalization of community-engaged implementation research (CEIR), focusing on implementation strategies in occupational therapy research. We found that current implementation efforts mainly rely on occupational therapy practitioners as community partners and use traditional recruitment methods and community engagement activities. In turn, they develop implementation strategies that mainly target practitioners without comprehensive, multilevel implementation support. We suggest more equitable collaboration with diverse partners to effectively promote the implementation and dissemination of evidence-based interventions in occupational therapy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance:  Despite the potential of community-engaged implementation research (CEIR) in developing strategies to accelerate the translation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), there is a noticeable knowledge gap in the current state of CEIR in occupational therapy. A synthesis of the concept, purpose, and operationalization of CEIR is necessary.

Objective:  To identify the contexts, purposes, and operationalization of CEIR, focusing on implementation strategies in occupational therapy.

Data sources:  PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science.

Study selection and data collection:  We included studies that were explicit and intentional about CEIR and that focused on implementation strategies to support the translation of occupational therapy interventions, clinical guidelines, practice models, theories, or assessments. We extracted the research context (e.g., partners, recruitment), purpose (e.g., why community-engaged research was used), and operationalization (e.g., community engagement [CE] activities, how their findings inform the research) using thematic analysis.

Findings:  Of 3,219 records, 6 studies were included. Involved partners were mainly occupational therapy practitioners from existing networks. CEIR that focuses on implementation strategies informs various aspects of research design, ranging from study design to sustainability, by developing community-academia partnerships, building implementation capacity, and creating implementation strategies across diverse research areas. Current research has used various but mostly traditional CE activities (e.g., focus groups).

Conclusions and relevance:  We synthesized evidence on CEIR focused on implementation strategies in occupational therapy. Intentional efforts are needed to collaborate with diverse partners, explore innovative CE activities, produce equitable outputs, and develop multilevel implementation strategies to accelerate the translation of EBIs into practice. Plain-Language Summary: In this review, we synthesize evidence on the contexts, purposes, and operationalization of community-engaged implementation research (CEIR), focusing on implementation strategies in occupational therapy research. We found that current implementation efforts mainly rely on occupational therapy practitioners as community partners and use traditional recruitment methods and community engagement activities. In turn, they develop implementation strategies that mainly target practitioners without comprehensive, multilevel implementation support. We suggest more equitable collaboration with diverse partners to effectively promote the implementation and dissemination of evidence-based interventions in occupational therapy practice.

职业疗法中的社区参与实施策略:范围审查。
重要性: 尽管社区参与实施研究(CEIR)在制定加速循证干预措施(EBIs)转化的战略方面具有潜力,但目前职业治疗领域的社区参与实施研究还存在明显的知识空白。有必要对 CEIR 的概念、目的和可操作性进行综合分析: 确定 CEIR 的背景、目的和可操作性,重点关注职业疗法中的实施策略: 数据来源:PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science: 我们纳入了明确且有意涉及 CEIR 的研究,这些研究侧重于实施策略,以支持职业治疗干预措施、临床指南、实践模式、理论或评估的转化。我们采用主题分析法提取了研究背景(如合作伙伴、招聘)、目的(如为何采用社区参与式研究)和操作性(如社区参与活动,其结果如何为研究提供信息): 在 3,219 条记录中,共纳入了 6 项研究。参与研究的合作伙伴主要是来自现有网络的职业治疗从业人员。以实施策略为重点的 CEIR 通过发展社区与学术界的伙伴关系、建设实施能力以及在不同研究领域制定实施策略,为研究设计的各个方面(从研究设计到可持续性)提供信息。目前的研究使用了各种但大多是传统的 CE 活动(如焦点小组): 我们综合了有关 CEIR 的证据,重点是职业疗法的实施策略。我们需要有意识地与不同的合作伙伴合作,探索创新的 CE 活动,产生公平的产出,并制定多层次的实施策略,以加速将 EBI 转化为实践。原文摘要:在这篇综述中,我们综合了有关社区参与实施研究(CEIR)的背景、目的和可操作性的证据,重点关注职业治疗研究中的实施策略。我们发现,目前的实施工作主要依靠职业治疗从业人员作为社区合作伙伴,并使用传统的招募方法和社区参与活动。反过来,他们制定的实施策略主要针对从业人员,没有全面、多层次的实施支持。我们建议与不同的合作伙伴开展更加公平的合作,以有效促进循证干预措施在职业治疗实践中的实施和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信