Reliability and Validity of the Persian Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Hesam Jahandideh, Maryam Biglari Abhari, Maryam Arab, Maryam Roomiani, Alireza Mohebbi, Bita Fazeli
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the Persian Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale.","authors":"Hesam Jahandideh, Maryam Biglari Abhari, Maryam Arab, Maryam Roomiani, Alireza Mohebbi, Bita Fazeli","doi":"10.61186/wjps.13.2.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale is a valid and specific questionnaire for evaluating nasal obstruction. The present study aimed to assess the validity of the Persian version of the NOSE questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2018 to April 2019. In the study group, eligible individuals referred to one clinic and Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran (a tertiary referral center) were asked to complete the questionnaire once on the first visit and once 3 months after the surgery. In the control group, healthy adults (above 18 years old) were selected among staff, students, residents, or relatives of the project executors. The NOSE questionnaire has 5 questions and a quality chart. The results were compared with the short form of the 12-item GHQ-12 questionnaire that had previously been translated and validated. SPSS 20 software was used to calculate Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient and to examine the convergent and discriminative validities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results obtained are consistent with the results of the primary research when developing the questionnaire and the results of studies conducted with different versions of the questionnaire in different languages and cultures. Analysis of research data showed that the Persian version of the NOSE questionnaire has acceptable internal consistency, repeatability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian version of the NOSE questionnaire has good validity and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.13.2.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale is a valid and specific questionnaire for evaluating nasal obstruction. The present study aimed to assess the validity of the Persian version of the NOSE questionnaire.

Methods: The present study is a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2018 to April 2019. In the study group, eligible individuals referred to one clinic and Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran (a tertiary referral center) were asked to complete the questionnaire once on the first visit and once 3 months after the surgery. In the control group, healthy adults (above 18 years old) were selected among staff, students, residents, or relatives of the project executors. The NOSE questionnaire has 5 questions and a quality chart. The results were compared with the short form of the 12-item GHQ-12 questionnaire that had previously been translated and validated. SPSS 20 software was used to calculate Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient and to examine the convergent and discriminative validities.

Results: The results obtained are consistent with the results of the primary research when developing the questionnaire and the results of studies conducted with different versions of the questionnaire in different languages and cultures. Analysis of research data showed that the Persian version of the NOSE questionnaire has acceptable internal consistency, repeatability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the NOSE questionnaire has good validity and reliability.

波斯鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)量表的可靠性和有效性。
背景:鼻阻塞症状评估量表(NOSE)是评估鼻阻塞的有效而具体的问卷。本研究旨在评估波斯语版 NOSE 问卷的有效性:本研究是一项横断面研究,于 2018 年 12 月至 2019 年 4 月进行。在研究组中,转诊至一家诊所和伊朗德黑兰 Firoozgar 医院(三级转诊中心)的符合条件者被要求在首次就诊时和术后 3 个月各完成一次问卷调查。在对照组中,从项目执行者的员工、学生、住院医师或亲属中挑选了健康的成年人(18 岁以上)。NOSE 问卷有 5 个问题和一个质量表。调查结果与之前翻译和验证过的 12 项 GHQ-12 问卷的简表进行了比较。使用 SPSS 20 软件计算了 Cronbach's alpha 和类内相关系数,并检查了收敛有效性和鉴别有效性:结果:所获得的结果与编制问卷时的初步研究结果以及使用不同语言和文化的不同版本问卷所进行的研究结果一致。对研究数据的分析表明,波斯语版本的 NOSE 问卷具有可接受的内部一致性、可重复性、收敛效度和区分效度:结论:波斯语版 NOSE 问卷具有良好的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信