Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Euido Nishijima, Yoshinori Itoh, Takahiko Noro, Shumpei Ogawa, Sachiyo Okude, Tadashi Nakano
{"title":"Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects.","authors":"Euido Nishijima, Yoshinori Itoh, Takahiko Noro, Shumpei Ogawa, Sachiyo Okude, Tadashi Nakano","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>The screening program using imo strongly correlates with 10-2 Standard automated perimetry in detecting central visual field defects in early glaucoma, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for efficient screening and severity quantification.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the correlation between abnormalities within the central 10° of the screening program using imo, a portable head-mounted perimeter, and 10-2 standard automated perimetry in early-stage glaucoma with central visual field defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included early glaucoma with (26 eyes) and without (38 eyes) central visual field defects. The correlation between the numbers of abnormal points within the central 10° of the imo screening program and those in the probability plot of 10-2, and mean total deviation and pattern deviation, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The imo screening program demonstrated sensitivity (80%) and specificity (98.7%) in detecting abnormalities, with a 91.6% agreement rate of 10-2. The mean number of anomalies in the 10-2 plot (pattern deviation) with P<1% was 0.85, 7.75, and 9.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.18-1.51, 5.38-10.1, and 6.89-12.5, respectively) for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively. The number of anomalies with P<1% was significantly higher when the imo screening program detected one anomaly versus none (P<0.01), and two versus one (P<0.05). Mean total deviation values were -1.15, -7.5, and -15.2 (95% confidence interval: -2.32 to 0.03, -11.21 to -3.78, and -19.7 to -10.6, respectively), while mean pattern deviation values were -1.57, -9.0, and -16.0 (95% confidence interval: -2.57 to -0.57, -12.5 to -5.49, and -21.4 to -10.7, respectively), for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The imo portable head-mounted perimeter was found to correlate with 10-2 standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects and has the potential to shorten visual field testing times.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: The screening program using imo strongly correlates with 10-2 Standard automated perimetry in detecting central visual field defects in early glaucoma, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for efficient screening and severity quantification.

Purpose: To investigate the correlation between abnormalities within the central 10° of the screening program using imo, a portable head-mounted perimeter, and 10-2 standard automated perimetry in early-stage glaucoma with central visual field defects.

Methods: This retrospective study included early glaucoma with (26 eyes) and without (38 eyes) central visual field defects. The correlation between the numbers of abnormal points within the central 10° of the imo screening program and those in the probability plot of 10-2, and mean total deviation and pattern deviation, were analyzed.

Results: The imo screening program demonstrated sensitivity (80%) and specificity (98.7%) in detecting abnormalities, with a 91.6% agreement rate of 10-2. The mean number of anomalies in the 10-2 plot (pattern deviation) with P<1% was 0.85, 7.75, and 9.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.18-1.51, 5.38-10.1, and 6.89-12.5, respectively) for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively. The number of anomalies with P<1% was significantly higher when the imo screening program detected one anomaly versus none (P<0.01), and two versus one (P<0.05). Mean total deviation values were -1.15, -7.5, and -15.2 (95% confidence interval: -2.32 to 0.03, -11.21 to -3.78, and -19.7 to -10.6, respectively), while mean pattern deviation values were -1.57, -9.0, and -16.0 (95% confidence interval: -2.57 to -0.57, -12.5 to -5.49, and -21.4 to -10.7, respectively), for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively.

Conclusions: The imo portable head-mounted perimeter was found to correlate with 10-2 standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects and has the potential to shorten visual field testing times.

使用 imo(一种便携式头戴式周界仪)进行双眼周界筛查与 10-2 标准自动周界仪筛查具有中心视野缺陷的早期青光眼的相关性。
原理:在检测早期青光眼中心视野缺损方面,使用 imo 的筛查程序与 10-2 标准自动周边测量法有很强的相关性,突显了其作为高效筛查和严重程度量化的宝贵工具的潜力。目的:研究在有中心视野缺损的早期青光眼中,使用 imo(一种便携式头戴周边测量仪)的筛查程序与 10-2 标准自动周边测量法在中心 10° 范围内的异常之间的相关性:这项回顾性研究包括有(26 眼)和无(38 眼)中心视野缺损的早期青光眼。分析了 imo 筛查项目中心 10° 范围内异常点数量与 10-2 概率图中异常点数量之间的相关性,以及平均总偏差和模式偏差:在检测异常点方面,imo 筛查程序的灵敏度(80%)和特异度(98.7%)与 10-2 的吻合率为 91.6%。10-2 图中异常的平均数量(模式偏差)与 PC 结论一致:研究发现,在有中心视野缺陷的青光眼患者中,imo 便携式头戴周视仪与 10-2 标准自动周视仪具有相关性,并有可能缩短视野测试时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信