Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure Subtypes.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Arwa Younis, Chadi Tabaja, Pasquale Santangeli, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Joseph Sipko, Ruth Madden, Patricia Bouscher, Tyler Taigen, Koji Higuchi, Katsuhide Hayashi, Abdel Hadi El Hajjar, Fatimah Chamseddine, Thomas Callahan, David O Martin, Shady Nakhla, Mohamed Kanj, Jakub Sroubek, Justin Z Lee, Walid I Saliba, Oussama M Wazni, Ayman A Hussein
{"title":"Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure Subtypes.","authors":"Arwa Younis, Chadi Tabaja, Pasquale Santangeli, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Joseph Sipko, Ruth Madden, Patricia Bouscher, Tyler Taigen, Koji Higuchi, Katsuhide Hayashi, Abdel Hadi El Hajjar, Fatimah Chamseddine, Thomas Callahan, David O Martin, Shady Nakhla, Mohamed Kanj, Jakub Sroubek, Justin Z Lee, Walid I Saliba, Oussama M Wazni, Ayman A Hussein","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter ablation (CA) improves clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of CA on clinical and quality-of-life outcomes across HF subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary center were enrolled in a prospective registry and included in this study (2013-2021). The primary end point was AF recurrence. Secondary end points included AF-related hospitalizations and quality-of-life outcomes. Patients were categorized according to their HF status: no HF, HFrEF, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7020 patients were included (80% no HF, 8% HFrEF, 7% HFmrEF, and 5% HFpEF). Over 3 years, the cumulative incidence of AF recurrence after ablation was as follows: HFpEF (53%), HFmrEF (41%), HFrEF (41%), and no HF (34%); <i>P</i><0.01. Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed these findings using no HF group as reference (HFpEF: hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.21-1.78]; HFmrEF: hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.04-1.45]; and HFrEF: hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.37]; <i>P</i><0.05 for all). In all groups, CA resulted in a significant reduction of AF-related hospitalization (mean rate per 1 patient-years [before and after CA]; HFpEF [1.8 versus 0.3], HFmrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], HFrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], and no HF [1 versus 0.1]; <i>P</i><0.01 for each comparison) and significant improvement in quality of life as measured by both the AF symptom severity score and the AF burden score (<i>P</i><0.01 for the comparison between baseline and follow-up for each score when tested separately).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF recurrence rates after CA were higher in patients with HF compared with those without HF, with patients with HFpEF being at the highest risk of recurrence. Nonetheless, CA was associated with a significant reduction in AF symptoms, AF-related hospitalization, and HF symptoms in most patients irrespective of HF subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e012926"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) improves clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of CA on clinical and quality-of-life outcomes across HF subtypes.

Methods: All patients undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary center were enrolled in a prospective registry and included in this study (2013-2021). The primary end point was AF recurrence. Secondary end points included AF-related hospitalizations and quality-of-life outcomes. Patients were categorized according to their HF status: no HF, HFrEF, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Results: A total of 7020 patients were included (80% no HF, 8% HFrEF, 7% HFmrEF, and 5% HFpEF). Over 3 years, the cumulative incidence of AF recurrence after ablation was as follows: HFpEF (53%), HFmrEF (41%), HFrEF (41%), and no HF (34%); P<0.01. Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed these findings using no HF group as reference (HFpEF: hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.21-1.78]; HFmrEF: hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.04-1.45]; and HFrEF: hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.37]; P<0.05 for all). In all groups, CA resulted in a significant reduction of AF-related hospitalization (mean rate per 1 patient-years [before and after CA]; HFpEF [1.8 versus 0.3], HFmrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], HFrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], and no HF [1 versus 0.1]; P<0.01 for each comparison) and significant improvement in quality of life as measured by both the AF symptom severity score and the AF burden score (P<0.01 for the comparison between baseline and follow-up for each score when tested separately).

Conclusions: AF recurrence rates after CA were higher in patients with HF compared with those without HF, with patients with HFpEF being at the highest risk of recurrence. Nonetheless, CA was associated with a significant reduction in AF symptoms, AF-related hospitalization, and HF symptoms in most patients irrespective of HF subtypes.

心房颤动消融术在心衰亚型中的疗效。
背景:导管消融(CA)可改善心房颤动(AF)和射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HF)患者的临床预后。我们旨在评估CA对不同HF亚型的临床和生活质量结果的影响:在一家三级中心接受房颤消融术的所有患者均被纳入前瞻性登记册,并纳入本研究(2013-2021 年)。主要终点是房颤复发。次要终点包括房颤相关住院治疗和生活质量结果。根据患者的房颤状态进行分类:无房颤、HFrEF、射血分数轻度降低的房颤(HFmrEF)和射血分数保留的房颤(HFpEF):共纳入 7020 名患者(80% 无房颤、8% 有房颤、7% 有房颤、5% 有房颤)。3年中,消融术后房颤复发的累计发生率如下:HFpEF(53%)、HFmrEF(41%)、HFrEF(41%)和无 HF(34%);PPPPC结论:与无 HF 患者相比,HF 患者 CA 后房颤复发率更高,其中 HFpEF 患者复发风险最高。尽管如此,无论心房颤动亚型如何,CA 对大多数患者的心房颤动症状、心房颤动相关住院治疗和心房颤动症状都有显著的缓解作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信