Indicators and factors related to one-year improved SCImago journal rank in nursing journals: A bibliometric analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70022
Sutthisak Srisawad, Kullacha Lertsittiphan, Pennapa Saenkla, Sirirut Tunsirirut
{"title":"Indicators and factors related to one-year improved SCImago journal rank in nursing journals: A bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Sutthisak Srisawad, Kullacha Lertsittiphan, Pennapa Saenkla, Sirirut Tunsirirut","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To analyse the bibliometric data of nursing journals covering general fields, specializations, skills and practices and investigate the influence of selection factors on the one-year improved SCImago journal rank (SJR).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A bibliometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study sample included academic journals in the field of nursing indexed in the Scopus and SJR database using data from 2020 to 2022. Quantile regression were performed that investigated the influence factors over the one-year improved SJR when variables were found to be non-normally distributed, characterized by extremely high kurtosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from 539 nursing journals retrieved from the Scopus and SCImago databases revealed that citation index remains the main factor that positively affects differences in SJR, while citable articles only affect the early stages of quantile regression. In addition, an excessively high number of research articles may negatively affect SJR, and the influence of self-citations can initially be positive but become negative the following year. Citations continue to be the dominant factor, while the rapid growth in the number of articles and self-citations must be addressed with caution.</p><p><strong>No patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To analyse the bibliometric data of nursing journals covering general fields, specializations, skills and practices and investigate the influence of selection factors on the one-year improved SCImago journal rank (SJR).

Design: A bibliometric analysis.

Methods: The study sample included academic journals in the field of nursing indexed in the Scopus and SJR database using data from 2020 to 2022. Quantile regression were performed that investigated the influence factors over the one-year improved SJR when variables were found to be non-normally distributed, characterized by extremely high kurtosis.

Results: Results from 539 nursing journals retrieved from the Scopus and SCImago databases revealed that citation index remains the main factor that positively affects differences in SJR, while citable articles only affect the early stages of quantile regression. In addition, an excessively high number of research articles may negatively affect SJR, and the influence of self-citations can initially be positive but become negative the following year. Citations continue to be the dominant factor, while the rapid growth in the number of articles and self-citations must be addressed with caution.

No patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

护理期刊一年内 SCImago 期刊排名提升的相关指标和因素:文献计量学分析。
目的:分析涵盖一般领域、专业、技能和实践的护理期刊的文献计量学数据,并研究选择因素对一年改进后的 SCImago 期刊排名(SJR)的影响:设计:文献计量学分析:研究样本包括Scopus和SJR数据库收录的护理领域学术期刊,数据时间为2020年至2022年。当发现变量呈非正态分布(峰度极高)时,进行了量子回归,以研究影响因素对一年内改进的SJR的影响:结果:从 Scopus 和 SCImago 数据库中检索的 539 种护理期刊的结果显示,引文索引仍是对 SJR 差异产生积极影响的主要因素,而可引用文章仅对量子回归的早期阶段产生影响。此外,研究文章数量过多可能会对 SJR 产生负面影响,而自我引用的影响最初可能是积极的,但第二年就会变成消极的。引用仍是主导因素,而文章和自我引用数量的快速增长必须谨慎对待:无患者或公众贡献:无患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信