Effectiveness of high-dose esomeprazole or pantoprazole 10-day sequential therapy empirically prescribed in Helicobacter pylori-infected naïve patients: a retrospective study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Matteo Pavoni, Giulia Fiorini, Angelo Zullo, Ilaria Maria Saracino, Luigi Gatta, Raffaele Manta, Andrea Imbrogno, Tiziana Lazzarotto, Claudio Borghi, Dino Vaira
{"title":"Effectiveness of high-dose esomeprazole or pantoprazole 10-day sequential therapy empirically prescribed in Helicobacter pylori-infected naïve patients: a retrospective study.","authors":"Matteo Pavoni, Giulia Fiorini, Angelo Zullo, Ilaria Maria Saracino, Luigi Gatta, Raffaele Manta, Andrea Imbrogno, Tiziana Lazzarotto, Claudio Borghi, Dino Vaira","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common bacterial infections affecting humans, causing gastroduodenal and extraintestinal diseases. Treatment of the infection remains challenging for the clinicians, and different factors are involved in the failure of the therapeutic approach. The importance of the intensity of acid secretion inhibition remains an unclear issue. The aim of this study is to assess whether 80 mg/day esomeprazole-based 10-day sequential therapy (esomeprazole-ST) achieved different eradication rates when compared to 80 mg/day pantoprazole-based analogous regimen (pantoprazole-ST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study where data of consecutive patients referred by their physicians to our unit to perform an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1,327 patients were available for the analysis: 599 and 728 patients received pantoprazole-ST and esomeprazole-ST, respectively. Eradication rate was significantly higher in patients receiving esomeprazole-ST (92.6%, 95% CI: 91-94.5) than pantoprazole-ST (89.3%, 95% CI: 86.7-91.7; difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: 0.2-6.5; P = 0.037). Even after a multivariate analysis, the esomeprazole-ST achieved a significantly higher eradiation (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.1-2.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that esomeprazole-ST achieved significantly higher H. pylori cure rates than pantoprazole-ST. Prospective and well-designed trials are demander to confirm this prelaminar finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common bacterial infections affecting humans, causing gastroduodenal and extraintestinal diseases. Treatment of the infection remains challenging for the clinicians, and different factors are involved in the failure of the therapeutic approach. The importance of the intensity of acid secretion inhibition remains an unclear issue. The aim of this study is to assess whether 80 mg/day esomeprazole-based 10-day sequential therapy (esomeprazole-ST) achieved different eradication rates when compared to 80 mg/day pantoprazole-based analogous regimen (pantoprazole-ST).

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study where data of consecutive patients referred by their physicians to our unit to perform an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were analyzed.

Results: Overall, 1,327 patients were available for the analysis: 599 and 728 patients received pantoprazole-ST and esomeprazole-ST, respectively. Eradication rate was significantly higher in patients receiving esomeprazole-ST (92.6%, 95% CI: 91-94.5) than pantoprazole-ST (89.3%, 95% CI: 86.7-91.7; difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: 0.2-6.5; P = 0.037). Even after a multivariate analysis, the esomeprazole-ST achieved a significantly higher eradiation (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.1-2.17).

Conclusions: This study showed that esomeprazole-ST achieved significantly higher H. pylori cure rates than pantoprazole-ST. Prospective and well-designed trials are demander to confirm this prelaminar finding.

对幽门螺旋杆菌感染的新患者采用大剂量埃索美拉唑或泮托拉唑 10 天序贯疗法的有效性:一项回顾性研究。
背景和目的:幽门螺杆菌感染是人类最常见的细菌感染之一,可引起胃十二指肠和肠外疾病。对临床医生来说,治疗幽门螺杆菌感染仍是一项挑战,治疗失败与不同的因素有关。酸分泌抑制强度的重要性仍是一个不明确的问题。本研究旨在评估与基于泮托拉唑的类似疗法(泮托拉唑-ST)相比,基于埃索美拉唑的80毫克/天的10天连续疗法(埃索美拉唑-ST)是否达到了不同的根除率:这是一项回顾性观察研究,分析了由医生转诊至本单位进行上消化道内镜检查的连续患者的数据:共有1,327名患者可供分析:599名和728名患者分别接受了泮托拉唑-ST和埃索美拉唑-ST治疗。埃索美拉唑-ST 患者的根除率(92.6%,95% CI:91-94.5)明显高于泮托拉唑-ST 患者(89.3%,95% CI:86.7-91.7;差异:3.3%;95% CI:0.2-6.5;P = 0.037)。即使经过多变量分析,埃索美拉唑-ST 的根除率也明显更高(OR:1.44;95% CI:1.1-2.17):本研究表明,埃索美拉唑-ST的幽门螺杆菌治愈率明显高于泮托拉唑-ST。需要进行前瞻性和精心设计的试验来证实这一研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信