Efficacy and outcomes of rescue screws in unstable pelvic ring injuries - A retrospective matched cohort study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Felix Karl-Ludwig Klingebiel, Yannik Kalbas, Octavia Klee, Anhua Long, Michel Teuben, Henrik Teuber, Sascha Halvachizadeh, Till Berk, Valentin Neuhaus, Hans-Christoph Pape, Roman Pfeifer
{"title":"Efficacy and outcomes of rescue screws in unstable pelvic ring injuries - A retrospective matched cohort study.","authors":"Felix Karl-Ludwig Klingebiel, Yannik Kalbas, Octavia Klee, Anhua Long, Michel Teuben, Henrik Teuber, Sascha Halvachizadeh, Till Berk, Valentin Neuhaus, Hans-Christoph Pape, Roman Pfeifer","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02649-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The emergency treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries is still a challenge and requires surgical and anesthesiological resuscitation. Emergency fixation of the unstable pelvic ring with percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screws, also known as \"Rescue Screws\", is an established treatment method. The aim of our study was to compare the outcome and complication rates of \"Rescue Screws\" with elective SI-screw fixations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1:1 ratio nearest-neighbor matched, retrospective cohort study of trauma patients with acute pelvic ring injuries at a level one trauma center was performed. Patients ≥ 15 years, treated with SI-screw fixation were included.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>pathologic fractures, missing consent and navigated procedures. The primary outcome parameters was defined as SI-screw revision operations. Patients were stratified according to treatment strategy (RS: Rescue Screws; EL: elective SI-screws).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 392 patients identified between 11/2014 and 08/2021, 186 met the inclusion criteria with 41 in the RS Group and 145 in the EL group. After matching, 41 patients were included in each group with similar baseline characteristics except persistent hemodynamic shock (RS: n = 22 (53.37%) vs. EL: n = 1 (4.3%), p < 0.001). Surgical characteristics were comparable in terms of instrumentation levels and insertion-sites. No significant differences were observed in the outcome parameters (revisions, reoperations, implant-associated complications, LOS and mortality) between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures with Rescue Screws appears as a feasible treatment option for emergency stabilization. Rescue Screws are not associated with elevated revision rates and increased complications rates. This minimally invasive technique enables safe emergency stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring. Prospective or randomized clinical trials are required to directly compare Rescue Screws with other competing emergency stabilization techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02649-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The emergency treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries is still a challenge and requires surgical and anesthesiological resuscitation. Emergency fixation of the unstable pelvic ring with percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screws, also known as "Rescue Screws", is an established treatment method. The aim of our study was to compare the outcome and complication rates of "Rescue Screws" with elective SI-screw fixations.

Methods: A 1:1 ratio nearest-neighbor matched, retrospective cohort study of trauma patients with acute pelvic ring injuries at a level one trauma center was performed. Patients ≥ 15 years, treated with SI-screw fixation were included.

Exclusion criteria: pathologic fractures, missing consent and navigated procedures. The primary outcome parameters was defined as SI-screw revision operations. Patients were stratified according to treatment strategy (RS: Rescue Screws; EL: elective SI-screws).

Results: From 392 patients identified between 11/2014 and 08/2021, 186 met the inclusion criteria with 41 in the RS Group and 145 in the EL group. After matching, 41 patients were included in each group with similar baseline characteristics except persistent hemodynamic shock (RS: n = 22 (53.37%) vs. EL: n = 1 (4.3%), p < 0.001). Surgical characteristics were comparable in terms of instrumentation levels and insertion-sites. No significant differences were observed in the outcome parameters (revisions, reoperations, implant-associated complications, LOS and mortality) between both groups.

Conclusion: Treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures with Rescue Screws appears as a feasible treatment option for emergency stabilization. Rescue Screws are not associated with elevated revision rates and increased complications rates. This minimally invasive technique enables safe emergency stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring. Prospective or randomized clinical trials are required to directly compare Rescue Screws with other competing emergency stabilization techniques.

Abstract Image

不稳定骨盆环损伤中使用救援螺钉的疗效和结果 - 一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
目的:不稳定骨盆环损伤的紧急治疗仍是一项挑战,需要手术和麻醉复苏。使用经皮骶髂(SI)螺钉(又称 "救援螺钉")紧急固定不稳定骨盆环是一种成熟的治疗方法。我们的研究旨在比较 "救援螺钉 "与择期骶髂螺钉固定术的疗效和并发症发生率:方法:我们在一级创伤中心对急性骨盆环损伤的创伤患者进行了1:1比例近邻匹配的回顾性队列研究。排除标准:病理性骨折、未获同意和导航手术。主要结果参数定义为SI螺钉翻修手术。根据治疗策略对患者进行分层(RS:救援螺钉;EL:选择性SI螺钉):结果:在2014年11月至2021年8月期间确认的392名患者中,186人符合纳入标准,其中41人属于RS组,145人属于EL组。配对后,两组各有 41 名患者,除持续性血流动力学休克外,基线特征相似(RS:n = 22 (53.37%) vs. EL:n = 1 (4.3%),P 结论:使用救援螺钉治疗不稳定骨盆环骨折似乎是一种可行的紧急稳定治疗方案。救援螺钉与翻修率升高和并发症增加无关。这种微创技术可以安全地紧急稳定骨盆后环。需要进行前瞻性或随机临床试验,以直接比较 Rescue Screws 与其他同类紧急稳定技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信