Effect of Intraspinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Xiaohua Sun, Jizheng Zhang, Yi Li, Jinli Che, Wanlu Ren
{"title":"Effect of Intraspinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Xiaohua Sun, Jizheng Zhang, Yi Li, Jinli Che, Wanlu Ren","doi":"10.62713/aic.3415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Acute appendicitis is a common disease in the elderly. Exploring a suitable anesthesia method is crucial in promoting postoperative recovery in elderly patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of intraspinal anesthesia in elderly patients with appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included the clinical data of 217 elderly patients with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) at Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University from January 2022 to January 2023. After excluding 8 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, the data from 209 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the different anesthesia methods, the study participants were divided into a reference group (n = 106) and a study group (n = 103). We compared the heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), blood oxygen saturation (SaO2), operation duration, hospitalization costs, discharge time, postoperative adverse reactions, inflammatory factor levels, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, anal exsufflation time, out-of-bed time, and incidence of postoperative complications between the two experimental groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that the study group exhibited higher levels of HR, RR, SBP, DBP, and SaO2 compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in operation time between the two groups (p > 0.05). The study group showed lower hospitalization cost and shorter discharge time than the reference group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the study group had lower incidence of postoperative adverse reactions than reference group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α between the two groups before and after surgery (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the study group had a lower VAS score compared to the reference group at 3 h, 6 h and 12 h after surgery (p < 0.001). The recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, anal exsufflation time, and out-of-bed time in the study group were substantially shorter than the reference group (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups within 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraspinal anesthesia, as a safe anesthesia method, can reduce the discharge time of elderly patients with acute appendicitis who underwent LA, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, and is beneficial for postoperative recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 4","pages":"669-677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Acute appendicitis is a common disease in the elderly. Exploring a suitable anesthesia method is crucial in promoting postoperative recovery in elderly patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of intraspinal anesthesia in elderly patients with appendicitis.

Methods: This study included the clinical data of 217 elderly patients with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) at Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University from January 2022 to January 2023. After excluding 8 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, the data from 209 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the different anesthesia methods, the study participants were divided into a reference group (n = 106) and a study group (n = 103). We compared the heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), blood oxygen saturation (SaO2), operation duration, hospitalization costs, discharge time, postoperative adverse reactions, inflammatory factor levels, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, anal exsufflation time, out-of-bed time, and incidence of postoperative complications between the two experimental groups.

Results: We observed that the study group exhibited higher levels of HR, RR, SBP, DBP, and SaO2 compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in operation time between the two groups (p > 0.05). The study group showed lower hospitalization cost and shorter discharge time than the reference group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the study group had lower incidence of postoperative adverse reactions than reference group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α between the two groups before and after surgery (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the study group had a lower VAS score compared to the reference group at 3 h, 6 h and 12 h after surgery (p < 0.001). The recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, anal exsufflation time, and out-of-bed time in the study group were substantially shorter than the reference group (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups within 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Intraspinal anesthesia, as a safe anesthesia method, can reduce the discharge time of elderly patients with acute appendicitis who underwent LA, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, and is beneficial for postoperative recovery.

椎管内麻醉对急性阑尾炎老年患者术后恢复的影响:回顾性研究
目的:急性阑尾炎是老年人的常见病。探索合适的麻醉方法对促进老年患者术后恢复至关重要。因此,本研究旨在探讨椎管内麻醉在老年阑尾炎患者中的临床效果:本研究纳入了 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间在天津大学天津医院接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的 217 例老年急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料。在排除8名不符合纳入标准的患者后,对209名患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。根据不同的麻醉方法,研究对象被分为参照组(106 人)和研究组(103 人)。我们比较了两个实验组的心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、血氧饱和度(SaO2)、手术时间、住院费用、出院时间、术后不良反应、炎症因子水平、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、肠蠕动恢复时间、肛门排气时间、离床时间和术后并发症发生率:我们观察到,与参照组相比,研究组的 HR、RR、SBP、DBP 和 SaO2 水平更高(P < 0.001)。然而,两组在手术时间上没有差异(P > 0.05)。与参照组相比,研究组的住院费用更低,出院时间更短(P < 0.001)。同样,研究组的术后不良反应发生率也低于参照组(P < 0.05)。两组患者术前和术后的 C 反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6 和肿瘤坏死因子-α 水平无明显差异(P > 0.05)。此外,与参照组相比,研究组在术后 3 小时、6 小时和 12 小时的 VAS 评分较低(P < 0.001)。研究组的肠蠕动恢复时间、肛门排气时间和下床活动时间大大短于参照组(P < 0.001)。此外,两组在术后一年内的并发症发生率没有差异(P < 0.001):结论:椎管内麻醉作为一种安全的麻醉方法,可以缩短接受 LA 治疗的老年急性阑尾炎患者的出院时间,减少不良反应的发生,有利于术后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信