Impact of different CO2 price paths on the development of the European electricity system

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Erdal Tekin, Annika Gillich, Kai Hufendiek
{"title":"Impact of different CO2 price paths on the development of the European electricity system","authors":"Erdal Tekin,&nbsp;Annika Gillich,&nbsp;Kai Hufendiek","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In energy system transformation studies, the assumption of linearly rising CO<sub>2</sub> prices is common and based on the decreasing issued European allowances (EUA). The actual auction price for allowances is influenced by market dynamics, resulting in non-linear variations in CO<sub>2</sub> prices due to the possibility of banking allowances. This study explores the impact of non-linear CO<sub>2</sub> price trajectories on the European electricity market. Various scenarios, such as increasing prices with the market interest rate, early price peaks, collapse, or fluctuations, are examined until 2030. The study quantifies the effects on power plant investments, profitability, consumer costs, and government revenues. The findings reveal that early and high price signals lead to an earlier transition with 7 % more wind power plants but at 4 % higher costs. Conversely, lower initial prices delay power plant investments in wind power plants by 6 % and result in 21 % higher emissions. Compensation for climate impact costs can yield a positive cost-benefit analysis in scenarios with early and high price signals when emissions are avoided through mechanisms like the Market Stability Reserve (MSR).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101499"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002086/pdfft?md5=44b7dfe40edadffb41b755d09b86c269&pid=1-s2.0-S2211467X24002086-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In energy system transformation studies, the assumption of linearly rising CO2 prices is common and based on the decreasing issued European allowances (EUA). The actual auction price for allowances is influenced by market dynamics, resulting in non-linear variations in CO2 prices due to the possibility of banking allowances. This study explores the impact of non-linear CO2 price trajectories on the European electricity market. Various scenarios, such as increasing prices with the market interest rate, early price peaks, collapse, or fluctuations, are examined until 2030. The study quantifies the effects on power plant investments, profitability, consumer costs, and government revenues. The findings reveal that early and high price signals lead to an earlier transition with 7 % more wind power plants but at 4 % higher costs. Conversely, lower initial prices delay power plant investments in wind power plants by 6 % and result in 21 % higher emissions. Compensation for climate impact costs can yield a positive cost-benefit analysis in scenarios with early and high price signals when emissions are avoided through mechanisms like the Market Stability Reserve (MSR).

Abstract Image

不同二氧化碳价格路径对欧洲电力系统发展的影响
在能源系统转型研究中,二氧化碳价格线性上升的假设很常见,其依据是发放的欧洲配额(EUA)不断减少。配额的实际拍卖价格受市场动态的影响,由于配额可以存入银行,从而导致二氧化碳价格的非线性变化。本研究探讨了非线性二氧化碳价格轨迹对欧洲电力市场的影响。研究了 2030 年前的各种情况,如价格随市场利率上升、价格提前达到峰值、崩溃或波动。研究量化了对发电厂投资、盈利能力、消费者成本和政府收入的影响。研究结果表明,早期价格信号和高价格信号会导致风力发电厂提前转型,风力发电厂数量增加 7%,但成本增加 4%。相反,较低的初始价格会使风力发电厂的投资推迟 6%,并导致排放量增加 21%。如果通过市场稳定储备(MSR)等机制避免排放,在价格信号较早和较高的情况下,气候影响成本补偿可产生积极的成本效益分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信