An Experiential Approach to Training Medical Faculty to Coach: "The Total Experience was Much More Than the Sum of Its Parts".

IF 1.6 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s10880-024-10038-0

Binata Mukherjee, Rebecca Smith, Gurupreet Khalsa

{"title":"An Experiential Approach to Training Medical Faculty to Coach: \"The Total Experience was Much More Than the Sum of Its Parts\".","authors":"Binata Mukherjee, Rebecca Smith, Gurupreet Khalsa","doi":"10.1007/s10880-024-10038-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coaching in academic medicine may be used for performance improvement as well as personal and professional growth and development. Medical faculty used to advising and mentoring learners may find it challenging to transition to coaching. Limited information is available about educating physicians to take on the role of coaching. We investigated a faculty coach training program at an academic medical center, using qualitative methods to explore how participants' perceptions of the training aligned with the elements of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Intentional Change Theory (ICT) that were taught using the principles of Experiential Learning Theory (ELT). Based on findings that illuminated understanding and practice of coaching, it may be summarized that the application of experiential learning may be an effective approach in helping faculty embrace the principles of SDT and ICT and make the shift to transformational coaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":"769-780"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-024-10038-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coaching in academic medicine may be used for performance improvement as well as personal and professional growth and development. Medical faculty used to advising and mentoring learners may find it challenging to transition to coaching. Limited information is available about educating physicians to take on the role of coaching. We investigated a faculty coach training program at an academic medical center, using qualitative methods to explore how participants' perceptions of the training aligned with the elements of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Intentional Change Theory (ICT) that were taught using the principles of Experiential Learning Theory (ELT). Based on findings that illuminated understanding and practice of coaching, it may be summarized that the application of experiential learning may be an effective approach in helping faculty embrace the principles of SDT and ICT and make the shift to transformational coaching.

查看原文本刊更多论文

以体验式方法培训医务人员担任教练："总体体验远远超过各部分的总和"。

学术医学中的辅导可用于提高绩效以及个人和专业成长与发展。习惯于为学习者提供建议和指导的医学教员可能会发现，向教练过渡具有挑战性。有关教育医生承担教练角色的信息十分有限。我们对一家学术医疗中心的教员教练培训项目进行了调查，采用定性方法探讨了参与者对培训的看法如何与自我决定理论（SDT）和意图改变理论（ICT）的要素相一致，这些要素是采用体验式学习理论（ELT）的原则传授的。根据对教练的理解和实践的研究结果，可以总结出，应用体验式学习可能是帮助教师接受 SDT 和 ICT 原则并向转型教练转变的有效方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.