Untangling the web between digital citizen empowerment, accountability and quality of participation experience for e-government: Lessons from India

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Swapnil Sharma , Arpan K. Kar , M.P. Gupta
{"title":"Untangling the web between digital citizen empowerment, accountability and quality of participation experience for e-government: Lessons from India","authors":"Swapnil Sharma ,&nbsp;Arpan K. Kar ,&nbsp;M.P. Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2024.101964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the digital era, governance is undergoing a transformation, moving state–citizen engagement into online realms, where citizens serve as users and collaborators in shaping services and policies. Empowering citizens to act as social innovators on issues affecting their lives and local communities is the key to facilitate this transition. As interactions between the state and citizens become more convenient, governments are increasingly focusing on digital citizen empowerment (DCE) to improve the life of their populace. Our study aims to understand the different dimensions of DCE and how it leads to better participation. It also aims to study the role of people's perception towards accountability mechanisms in place and how they can pave the way to enhanced participation behaviour. Employing a mixed-method approach, the study utilises structural equation modelling to examine the relation among e-participation, DCE, and public and social accountability. The results conceptualise DCE, identifying its four dimensions: emotional, cognitive, relational, and behavioural. Furthermore, it underscores the significance of citizens' perceptions of governmental and social accountability in fostering e-participation. These findings are subsequently validated through a focus group discussion involving specialists from relevant fields. The results indicate that behavioural empowerment stands out as the most crucial aspect of DCE and that DCE enhances the quality of participation, with accountability mechanisms playing a pivotal role in achieving this outcome. Additionally, the findings reveal public disenchantment with e-government initiatives due to perceived administrative unresponsiveness. By pinpointing specific dimensions of individual empowerment, this study provides insights for policymakers to deliver accountable e-government services that promote enhanced e-participation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 3","pages":"Article 101964"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X2400056X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the digital era, governance is undergoing a transformation, moving state–citizen engagement into online realms, where citizens serve as users and collaborators in shaping services and policies. Empowering citizens to act as social innovators on issues affecting their lives and local communities is the key to facilitate this transition. As interactions between the state and citizens become more convenient, governments are increasingly focusing on digital citizen empowerment (DCE) to improve the life of their populace. Our study aims to understand the different dimensions of DCE and how it leads to better participation. It also aims to study the role of people's perception towards accountability mechanisms in place and how they can pave the way to enhanced participation behaviour. Employing a mixed-method approach, the study utilises structural equation modelling to examine the relation among e-participation, DCE, and public and social accountability. The results conceptualise DCE, identifying its four dimensions: emotional, cognitive, relational, and behavioural. Furthermore, it underscores the significance of citizens' perceptions of governmental and social accountability in fostering e-participation. These findings are subsequently validated through a focus group discussion involving specialists from relevant fields. The results indicate that behavioural empowerment stands out as the most crucial aspect of DCE and that DCE enhances the quality of participation, with accountability mechanisms playing a pivotal role in achieving this outcome. Additionally, the findings reveal public disenchantment with e-government initiatives due to perceived administrative unresponsiveness. By pinpointing specific dimensions of individual empowerment, this study provides insights for policymakers to deliver accountable e-government services that promote enhanced e-participation.

解开数字公民赋权、问责制和电子政务参与体验质量之间的联系:印度的经验教训
在数字时代,治理正在经历一场变革,国家与公民的参与正在向在线领域转移,公民作为用户和合作者参与服务和政策的制定。赋予公民权力,让他们在影响其生活和当地社区的问题上发挥社会创新者的作用,是促进这一转变的关键。随着国家与公民之间的互动变得越来越方便,政府越来越重视数字公民赋权(DCE),以改善民众的生活。我们的研究旨在了解数字公民赋权的不同层面,以及它如何带来更好的参与。本研究还旨在研究人们对现有问责机制的看法所起的作用,以及这些机制如何为加强参与行为铺平道路。本研究采用混合方法,利用结构方程模型来研究电子参与、民主参与和公共及社会问责之间的关系。研究结果提出了 "情感参与 "的概念,确定了其四个维度:情感、认知、关系和行为。此外,它还强调了公民对政府和社会责任的认知在促进电子参与方面的重要性。随后,相关领域专家参与的焦点小组讨论验证了这些研究结果。结果表明,行为赋权是电子参与的最重要方面,电子参与提高了参与的质量,而问责机制在实现这一结果方面发挥了关键作用。此外,研究结果还显示,由于认为行政部门反应迟钝,公众对电子政务举措不感兴趣。本研究通过指出个人赋权的具体层面,为决策者提供了提供负责任的电子政务服务以促进电子参与的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信