The Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Emergency Departments and Intensive Care Units: A Descriptive Study From Turkey.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nihan Şık, Gazi Arslan, Ayla Akca Çağlar, Nazan Ülgen Tekerek, İlknur Fidancı, Özlem Tolu Kendir, Alkan Bal, Özden Özgür Horoz, Ayşe Berna Anıl, Dinçer Yıldızdaş, Murat Duman, Oğuz Dursun
{"title":"The Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Emergency Departments and Intensive Care Units: A Descriptive Study From Turkey.","authors":"Nihan Şık, Gazi Arslan, Ayla Akca Çağlar, Nazan Ülgen Tekerek, İlknur Fidancı, Özlem Tolu Kendir, Alkan Bal, Özden Özgür Horoz, Ayşe Berna Anıl, Dinçer Yıldızdaş, Murat Duman, Oğuz Dursun","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the current status of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), perceptions, education, training, and barriers to using POCUS in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, multicenter, cross-sectional study through an online survey was developed using the REDCap online platform. The survey was distributed through the Turkish Society of Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care e-mail group. Each survey was answered only once by each PED/PICU and by the clinical chief of the department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 PEDs and 26 PICUs responded to the survey. Among them, 84.2% of PEDs and 100% of PICUs reported the clinical use of POCUS. For diagnostic applications, the most common areas for PEDs and PICUs were thoracic (93.7%/100%) and cardiovascular (62.5%/65.4%) assessment, and in the procedural use of POCUS, the most frequent applications were those for vascular access (75.0%/92.3%) and thoracentesis (31.2%/65.4%). The most commonly reported clinical benefits were rapid diagnosis, rapid treatment, and decreased complications during procedural applications for PEDs and PICUs. Evaluating the barriers to POCUS use in PEDs and PICUs, the most common reasons for insufficient use were the lack of ultrasound machines and/or equipment, a shortage of manpower, lack of awareness, and lack of training. For PEDs (68.4%) and for PICUs (84.6%), participants agreed that POCUS training should be mandatory during fellowship programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants were aware of the need for POCUS. However, lack of education, equipment, manpower, and infrastructure still emerged as barriers to the use of POCUS. To further promote POCUS use, it would be helpful to improve accessibility by ensuring sufficient numbers of ultrasound devices together with sufficient numbers of appointed physicians and by expanding POCUS education in PEDs and PICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the current status of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), perceptions, education, training, and barriers to using POCUS in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Turkey.

Methods: A descriptive, multicenter, cross-sectional study through an online survey was developed using the REDCap online platform. The survey was distributed through the Turkish Society of Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care e-mail group. Each survey was answered only once by each PED/PICU and by the clinical chief of the department.

Results: A total of 19 PEDs and 26 PICUs responded to the survey. Among them, 84.2% of PEDs and 100% of PICUs reported the clinical use of POCUS. For diagnostic applications, the most common areas for PEDs and PICUs were thoracic (93.7%/100%) and cardiovascular (62.5%/65.4%) assessment, and in the procedural use of POCUS, the most frequent applications were those for vascular access (75.0%/92.3%) and thoracentesis (31.2%/65.4%). The most commonly reported clinical benefits were rapid diagnosis, rapid treatment, and decreased complications during procedural applications for PEDs and PICUs. Evaluating the barriers to POCUS use in PEDs and PICUs, the most common reasons for insufficient use were the lack of ultrasound machines and/or equipment, a shortage of manpower, lack of awareness, and lack of training. For PEDs (68.4%) and for PICUs (84.6%), participants agreed that POCUS training should be mandatory during fellowship programs.

Conclusions: Most participants were aware of the need for POCUS. However, lack of education, equipment, manpower, and infrastructure still emerged as barriers to the use of POCUS. To further promote POCUS use, it would be helpful to improve accessibility by ensuring sufficient numbers of ultrasound devices together with sufficient numbers of appointed physicians and by expanding POCUS education in PEDs and PICUs.

儿科急诊室和重症监护室使用护理点超声波:土耳其的一项描述性研究
研究目的目的是评估土耳其儿科急诊科(PED)和儿科重症监护室(PICU)使用护理点超声(POCUS)的现状、认知、教育、培训和障碍:利用 REDCap 在线平台,通过在线调查进行了一项描述性、多中心、横断面研究。调查通过土耳其儿科急诊和重症监护学会的电子邮件群组发布。每个 PED/PICU 和科室临床主任只回答一次调查问卷:共有 19 家 PED 和 26 家 PICU 对调查做出了回复。其中,84.2% 的 PED 和 100% 的 PICU 报告在临床上使用了 POCUS。在诊断应用方面,PED 和 PICU 最常见的领域是胸腔(93.7%/100%)和心血管(62.5%/65.4%)评估,而在 POCUS 的程序应用方面,最常见的应用是血管通路(75.0%/92.3%)和胸腔穿刺(31.2%/65.4%)。在 PED 和 PICU 的程序应用中,最常报告的临床益处是快速诊断、快速治疗和减少并发症。在评估 PED 和 PICU 使用 POCUS 的障碍时,使用不足的最常见原因是缺乏超声机器和/或设备、人手不足、缺乏认识和缺乏培训。就 PEDs(68.4%)和 PICUs(84.6%)而言,与会者一致认为在研究员计划中应强制开展 POCUS 培训:结论:大多数参与者都意识到了 POCUS 的必要性。然而,缺乏教育、设备、人力和基础设施仍是使用 POCUS 的障碍。为进一步推广 POCUS 的使用,确保有足够数量的超声设备和足够数量的指定医师,并在 PED 和 PICU 中扩大 POCUS 教育,将有助于提高 POCUS 的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信