The impact of smartphone deprivation on attentional bias in problematic smartphone users: Evidence from behavioral and physiological perspectives

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
{"title":"The impact of smartphone deprivation on attentional bias in problematic smartphone users: Evidence from behavioral and physiological perspectives","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study innovatively applied smartphone deprivation and aimed to assess its behavioral and physiological effects in problematic smartphone users. In Experiment 1, 283 participants completed an investigation related to smartphone use, including 92 participants identified as problematic smartphone users. Based on an average smartphone unlocking interval of 19.67 min, the duration of smartphone deprivation was set to 20 min. After deprivation, the participants exhibited a significant increase in smartphone cravings and a decrease in heart rate. Experiment 2 applied a modified cueing task to explore problematic smartphone users’ attentional bias, in which smartphone-related and neutral pictures were selected as the materials. There were 22 and 23 participants in the smartphone-deprivation and control groups, respectively. In the deprivation group, reaction times (RTs) for smartphone-related pictures were longer than for neutral pictures. In Experiment 3, we incorporated electroencephalography technology to also assess a smartphone turned-off group. There were 16, 21, and 14 participants in smartphone deprivation, smartphone turned-off, and control groups, respectively. In both the smartphone deprivation and smartphone turned-off groups, participants had longer RTs on smartphone-related pictures than on neutral pictures. Furthermore, for participants in the deprivation group, N2 latencies in relation to smartphone-related pictures were earlier than those in relation to neutral pictures, while participants in the turned-off group had larger P3 amplitudes and earlier P3 latencies for invalid cues compared with valid cues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002802","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study innovatively applied smartphone deprivation and aimed to assess its behavioral and physiological effects in problematic smartphone users. In Experiment 1, 283 participants completed an investigation related to smartphone use, including 92 participants identified as problematic smartphone users. Based on an average smartphone unlocking interval of 19.67 min, the duration of smartphone deprivation was set to 20 min. After deprivation, the participants exhibited a significant increase in smartphone cravings and a decrease in heart rate. Experiment 2 applied a modified cueing task to explore problematic smartphone users’ attentional bias, in which smartphone-related and neutral pictures were selected as the materials. There were 22 and 23 participants in the smartphone-deprivation and control groups, respectively. In the deprivation group, reaction times (RTs) for smartphone-related pictures were longer than for neutral pictures. In Experiment 3, we incorporated electroencephalography technology to also assess a smartphone turned-off group. There were 16, 21, and 14 participants in smartphone deprivation, smartphone turned-off, and control groups, respectively. In both the smartphone deprivation and smartphone turned-off groups, participants had longer RTs on smartphone-related pictures than on neutral pictures. Furthermore, for participants in the deprivation group, N2 latencies in relation to smartphone-related pictures were earlier than those in relation to neutral pictures, while participants in the turned-off group had larger P3 amplitudes and earlier P3 latencies for invalid cues compared with valid cues.

智能手机剥夺对问题智能手机用户注意力偏差的影响:行为学和生理学角度的证据
本研究创新性地应用了智能手机剥夺法,旨在评估其对问题智能手机用户的行为和生理影响。在实验 1 中,283 名参与者完成了与智能手机使用相关的调查,其中 92 人被认定为问题智能手机用户。根据智能手机平均解锁时间间隔为 19.67 分钟,智能手机剥夺时间设定为 20 分钟。剥夺智能手机后,参与者对智能手机的渴望显著增加,心率下降。实验二采用了一种改良的提示任务来探究问题智能手机用户的注意偏差,其中选择了与智能手机相关的图片和中性图片作为材料。剥夺智能手机组和对照组分别有 22 和 23 名参与者。在剥夺组中,用户对智能手机相关图片的反应时间(RTs)长于中性图片。在实验 3 中,我们采用脑电图技术对智能手机关闭组进行了评估。智能手机剥夺组、智能手机关闭组和对照组分别有 16、21 和 14 名参与者。在剥夺智能手机组和关闭智能手机组中,参与者对智能手机相关图片的反应时间都长于对中性图片的反应时间。此外,对于剥夺组的参与者来说,与智能手机相关图片有关的 N2 潜伏期早于与中性图片有关的 N2 潜伏期,而与有效线索相比,关机组的参与者对无效线索的 P3 振幅更大,P3 潜伏期更早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信