Predictive value of NCCT quantitative analysis for proximal and middle impacted ureteral stones.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Haiyang Wei, Xinyu Shi, Changbao Xu, Wuxue Li, Tianhe Zhang, Zhiheng Huang, Junkai Yang, Xinghua Zhao
{"title":"Predictive value of NCCT quantitative analysis for proximal and middle impacted ureteral stones.","authors":"Haiyang Wei, Xinyu Shi, Changbao Xu, Wuxue Li, Tianhe Zhang, Zhiheng Huang, Junkai Yang, Xinghua Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01616-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to explore the predictive value of preoperative quantitative NCCT analysis for proximal and middle ureteral stone impaction. Data of 128 patients who diagnosed with proximal and middle ureteral stones were analyzed. Stone size, upper diameter of the ureter(D1), lower diameter of the ureter (D2), CT attenuation of the ureter above the stone (HA, 'HU above'), CT attenuation of the ureter below the stone (HB, 'HU below'), CT attenuation values of the stone's proximal segments (C1), CT attenuation values of the stone's distal segments (C2), and ureteral wall thickness(UWT)were recorded. Logistic regression was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of the data to determine the independent predictors of proximal and middle ureteral stone impaction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive performance. Among the 128 patients, 52 (40.6%) had impacted stones, while 76 (59.4%) did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that stone size > 9.45 mm (OR = 1.372, 95% CI = 1.071-1.756, P = 0.012), UWT > 3.22 mm (OR = 4.217, 95% CI = 2.165 ~ 8.213, P < 0.001)、DDR > 2.10 (OR = 4.901, 95% CI = 1.797 ~ 13.365, P = 0.002)and HBA > 1.58 (OR = 5.237,95% CI = 1.502 ~ 18.259, P = 0.009)were independent risk factors for predicting ureteral stone impaction. In conclusion, stone size, UWT, DDR, and HBA show crucial predictive value for impaction of stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01616-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore the predictive value of preoperative quantitative NCCT analysis for proximal and middle ureteral stone impaction. Data of 128 patients who diagnosed with proximal and middle ureteral stones were analyzed. Stone size, upper diameter of the ureter(D1), lower diameter of the ureter (D2), CT attenuation of the ureter above the stone (HA, 'HU above'), CT attenuation of the ureter below the stone (HB, 'HU below'), CT attenuation values of the stone's proximal segments (C1), CT attenuation values of the stone's distal segments (C2), and ureteral wall thickness(UWT)were recorded. Logistic regression was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of the data to determine the independent predictors of proximal and middle ureteral stone impaction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive performance. Among the 128 patients, 52 (40.6%) had impacted stones, while 76 (59.4%) did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that stone size > 9.45 mm (OR = 1.372, 95% CI = 1.071-1.756, P = 0.012), UWT > 3.22 mm (OR = 4.217, 95% CI = 2.165 ~ 8.213, P < 0.001)、DDR > 2.10 (OR = 4.901, 95% CI = 1.797 ~ 13.365, P = 0.002)and HBA > 1.58 (OR = 5.237,95% CI = 1.502 ~ 18.259, P = 0.009)were independent risk factors for predicting ureteral stone impaction. In conclusion, stone size, UWT, DDR, and HBA show crucial predictive value for impaction of stones.

Abstract Image

NCCT 定量分析对输尿管近端和中段冲击性结石的预测价值。
该研究旨在探讨术前定量 NCCT 分析对输尿管近端和中段结石嵌顿的预测价值。研究分析了128例输尿管近端和中段结石患者的数据。记录了结石大小、输尿管上段直径(D1)、输尿管下段直径(D2)、结石上方输尿管的CT衰减(HA,"HU above")、结石下方输尿管的CT衰减(HB,"HU below")、结石近段的CT衰减值(C1)、结石远段的CT衰减值(C2)和输尿管壁厚度(UWT)。采用逻辑回归对数据进行单变量和多变量分析,以确定输尿管近端和中段结石嵌顿的独立预测因素。绘制接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)来评估预测性能。在128名患者中,52人(40.6%)有结石嵌顿,76人(59.4%)没有。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,结石大小 > 9.45 mm(OR = 1.372,95% CI = 1.071-1.756,P = 0.012)、UWT > 3.22 mm(OR = 4.217,95% CI = 2.165 ~ 8.213,P 2.10(OR = 4.901,95% CI = 1.797 ~ 13.365,P = 0.002)和 HBA > 1.58(OR = 5.237,95% CI = 1.502 ~ 18.259,P = 0.009)是预测输尿管结石嵌顿的独立危险因素。总之,结石大小、UWT、DDR 和 HBA 对结石嵌顿具有重要的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信