Vaccination status of patients with primary immunodeficiencies in Germany-a multicentric epidemiologic analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Eva C Schwaneck, Anna S Harasim, Hans-Peter Tony, Micha Gawlik, Torsten Witte, Stefanie Joos, Michael Gernert, Marc Schmalzing, Henner Morbach, Matthias Fröhlich, Manuel Krone
{"title":"Vaccination status of patients with primary immunodeficiencies in Germany-a multicentric epidemiologic analysis.","authors":"Eva C Schwaneck, Anna S Harasim, Hans-Peter Tony, Micha Gawlik, Torsten Witte, Stefanie Joos, Michael Gernert, Marc Schmalzing, Henner Morbach, Matthias Fröhlich, Manuel Krone","doi":"10.1007/s00393-024-01549-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccinations represent an easily accessible, safe, and important method for preventing infections. Patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) are more susceptible to infections and should receive an extended spectrum of immunizations in many countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2019 and May 2020, vaccination certificates of 70 patients with PID from the regions of Würzburg and Hanover in Germany were evaluated. The patients were additionally surveyed regarding their attitude towards vaccinations and the communication with their physicians. Medical records were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 70 patients, 54 (77%) suffered from common variable immunodeficiency, 30 (43%) were diagnosed with accompanying autoimmunity, 62 (89%) had an increased susceptibility to infections, and 56 (80%) were on immunoglobulin substitution therapy. Seven patients (10%) had neither a vaccination certificate nor were they able to recollect of their last vaccination. Only 55 (79%) and 43 (61%) patients stated that their rheumatologist or immunologist had recommended an influenza and a pneumococcal vaccination, respectively. When asked about their overall trust in vaccinations on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = very low, 10 = very high), the mean value was 7.8. The most common vaccination was against tetanus in 63 (90%) patients, 49 (70%) had received vaccination against pneumococci, and 39 (56%) had received an influenza vaccination. Interestingly, 26 patients (37%) were vaccinated against measles, even though this is contraindicated in most PID patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that vaccination rates in this at-risk population are insufficient. Healthcare providers should emphasize vaccinations routinely when caring for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-024-01549-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaccinations represent an easily accessible, safe, and important method for preventing infections. Patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) are more susceptible to infections and should receive an extended spectrum of immunizations in many countries.

Methods: Between January 2019 and May 2020, vaccination certificates of 70 patients with PID from the regions of Würzburg and Hanover in Germany were evaluated. The patients were additionally surveyed regarding their attitude towards vaccinations and the communication with their physicians. Medical records were analyzed.

Results: Of the 70 patients, 54 (77%) suffered from common variable immunodeficiency, 30 (43%) were diagnosed with accompanying autoimmunity, 62 (89%) had an increased susceptibility to infections, and 56 (80%) were on immunoglobulin substitution therapy. Seven patients (10%) had neither a vaccination certificate nor were they able to recollect of their last vaccination. Only 55 (79%) and 43 (61%) patients stated that their rheumatologist or immunologist had recommended an influenza and a pneumococcal vaccination, respectively. When asked about their overall trust in vaccinations on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = very low, 10 = very high), the mean value was 7.8. The most common vaccination was against tetanus in 63 (90%) patients, 49 (70%) had received vaccination against pneumococci, and 39 (56%) had received an influenza vaccination. Interestingly, 26 patients (37%) were vaccinated against measles, even though this is contraindicated in most PID patients.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that vaccination rates in this at-risk population are insufficient. Healthcare providers should emphasize vaccinations routinely when caring for these patients.

德国原发性免疫缺陷患者的疫苗接种情况--多中心流行病学分析。
背景:接种疫苗是一种易于获得、安全且重要的预防感染方法。在许多国家,原发性免疫缺陷(PID)患者更容易受到感染,因此应接受更广泛的免疫接种:方法:2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月期间,对德国维尔茨堡和汉诺威地区 70 名 PID 患者的疫苗接种证书进行了评估。此外,还调查了患者对疫苗接种的态度以及与医生的沟通情况。对医疗记录进行了分析:在 70 名患者中,54 人(77%)患有常见变异性免疫缺陷症,30 人(43%)被诊断为伴有自身免疫,62 人(89%)对感染的易感性增加,56 人(80%)正在接受免疫球蛋白替代治疗。七名患者(10%)既没有疫苗接种证书,也记不起上次接种的疫苗。分别只有 55 名(79%)和 43 名(61%)患者表示他们的风湿免疫科医生或免疫科医生建议他们接种流感疫苗和肺炎球菌疫苗。当被问及他们对疫苗接种的总体信任度时,平均值为 7.8,信任度从 0 到 10(0 = 非常低,10 = 非常高)。63 名(90%)患者最常接种的疫苗是破伤风疫苗,49 名(70%)接种过肺炎球菌疫苗,39 名(56%)接种过流感疫苗。有趣的是,有 26 名患者(37%)接种了麻疹疫苗,尽管大多数 PID 患者禁忌接种麻疹疫苗:我们的数据表明,这类高危人群的疫苗接种率不足。结论:我们的数据表明,这类高危人群的疫苗接种率不足,医疗服务提供者在护理这类患者时应强调常规疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie ist ein international angesehenes Publikationsorgan und dient der Fortbildung von niedergelassenen und in der Klinik tätigen Rheumatologen. Die Zeitschrift widmet sich allen Aspekten der klinischen Rheumatologie, der Therapie rheumatischer Erkrankungen sowie der rheumatologischen Grundlagenforschung. Umfassende Übersichtsarbeiten zu einem aktuellen Schwerpunktthema sind das Kernstück jeder Ausgabe. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei gesichertes Wissen zu Diagnostik und Therapie mit hoher Relevanz für die tägliche Arbeit – der Leser erhält konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen. Frei eingereichte Originalien ermöglichen die Präsentation wichtiger klinischer Studien und dienen dem wissenschaftlichen Austausch.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信